Social media gave stupid people voices.
Stupid people always had voices. Social media gave them an amplifier.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Social media gave stupid people voices.
and an opportunity to see what idiots we've electedStupid people always had voices. Social media gave them an amplifier.
Stupid people always had voices. Social media gave them an amplifier.
He’s been brainwashed to think there is no such thing as necessary/justified lethal force if a minority is killed police. He believes in his heart of hearts that he is a change agent. Well, he’s an agent of bullshit.Like this moron?
![]()
He now deleted the tweet. Note that this came after the video was provided to the public.
Social media gave stupid people voices.
Those of us who were on Usenet saw the lowest common denominator. Social media brought it to the masses.Stupid people always had voices. Social media gave them an amplifier.
Honest question...Would The Cooler be considered part of the social media?Social media gave stupid people voices.
It’s a branch of the tree but because it isn’t owned and moderated by Big Tech, it’s actually fairly neutral.Honest question...Would The Cooler be considered part of the social media?
Honest question...Would The Cooler be considered part of the social media?
We already know the identity of the officer who shot the girl in Columbus. . Compare that to how the media, Pelosi, snd others have protected Pelosi’s Pretorian Guard at the Capitol who shot and killed a trespasser.Here’s another race baiter who made it onto the dais during the Democrat debates.
Shame on these people. Not a single one will get my vote.
Wow. Just fvcking WOW!We already know the identity of the officer who shot the girl in Columbus. . Compare that to how the media, Pelosi, snd others have protected Pelosi’s Pretorian Guard at the Capitol who shot and killed a trespasser.
That’s true. I’m not so sure higher salaries mean better or more dedicated attorneys. In Colorado each DA is local and is constrained by local resources. The PD is a state system and resources are allocated state wide where needed. They also have a little more flexibility to move people where needed.CoH, my remarks about "resources" are limited to what i know about the justice system in Indianapolis (Marion County, Indiana) and are based upon a few conversations with lawyers working for the the prosecutor and public defender office.
Public defenders are paid less and have much larger case loads than their counter parts in the prosecutor's office. Thus defendants who cannot afford to hire one of the community's talented defense attorneys have the deck stacked against them in my opinion. An opinion admittedly based on limited knowledge.
You’d be a lot more credible if you weren’t so partisan (in a weird way) on the Babbitt incident. You should be for the rule of law. She stormed the Capitol and breached a no-go zone. If that were a BLM rioter you’d be all for the shooting.We already know the identity of the officer who shot the girl in Columbus. . Compare that to how the media, Pelosi, snd others have protected Pelosi’s Pretorian Guard at the Capitol who shot and killed a trespasser.
Not crazy, just showing his hyper partisan ass.Wow. Just fvcking WOW!
You've gone totally crazy.
That last is what's so infuriating.You’d be a lot more credible if you weren’t so partisan (in a weird way) on the Babbitt incident. You should be for the rule of law. She stormed the Capitol and breached a no-go zone. If that were a BLM rioter you’d be all for the shooting.
We already know the identity of the officer who shot the girl in Columbus. . Compare that to how the media, Pelosi, snd others have protected Pelosi’s Pretorian Guard at the Capitol who shot and killed a trespasser.
According to this article, CO public defenders handle two to three times the case load they should. https://www.abajournal.com/news/art...ases-at-once-the-workload-can-be-overwhelmingThat’s true. I’m not so sure higher salaries mean better or more dedicated attorneys. In Colorado each DA is local and is constrained by local resources. The PD is a state system and resources are allocated state wide where needed. They also have a little more flexibility to move people where needed.
I want to clarify that I do not subscribe to the “oh the cops treated those rioters differently” narrative that the simple minded prescribe. I’m specifically talking about the shooting of Babbitt which was totally justified and is the only person shot in any riot in the last trailing 12 months.That last is what's so infuriating.
According to this article, CO public defenders handle two to three times the case load they should. https://w
for sure. in MO there's a waiting list and more than 500 defendants have had to wait more than a year to get a pd assigned. that's how underfunded the pd's office is here. totally unconstl for indigentsAccording to this article, CO public defenders handle two to three times the case load they should. https://www.abajournal.com/news/art...ases-at-once-the-workload-can-be-overwhelming
in all local government shootings we know who the shooter is and in cases where the shooter was cleared, it’s often by a grand jury or an accountable and elected DA. In all cases it’s mostly a public and transparent process. In the case of the capitol shooting we don’t know jack shit. Not the name of the officer. Not why his use of deadly force was deemed necessary. And not the name of the unaccountable individual who cleared the cop. Pelosi seems to think Capitol security is her domain and Capitol cops are her personal security force. We already know what a circus she made of officer Sicknick’s death. Yes, I agree the Capitol riot was a terrible thing. But the Democrats and Pelosi outdid it at every turn. Babbitt‘s death and the aftermath is the strangest cop shooting in many different ways In a long while.You’d be a lot more credible if you weren’t so partisan (in a weird way) on the Babbitt incident. You should be for the rule of law. She stormed the Capitol and breached a no-go zone. If that were a BLM rioter you’d be all for the shooting.
The silence around the Cap police officer’s identity is a tribute to their brotherhood. Nobody is leaking anything to allow procedure to follow. They’re an elite police force.in all local government shootings we know who the shooter is and in cases where the shooter was cleared, it’s often by a grand jury or an accountable and elected DA. In all cases it’s mostly a public and transparent process. In the case of the capitol shooting we don’t know jack shit. Not the name of the officer. Not why his use of deadly force was deemed necessary. And not the name of the unaccountable individual who cleared the cop. Pelosi seems to think Capitol security is her domain and Capitol cops are her personal security force. We already know what a circus she made of officer Sicknick’s death. Yes, I agree the Capitol riot was a terrible thing. But the Democrats and Pelosi outdid it at every turn. Babbitt‘s death and the aftermath is the strangest cop shooting in many different ways In a long while.
That last is what's so infuriating.
Not mentioned by the "good" Senator, the girl who was shot appeared to be a second away from stabbing another black female after having just assaulted a third female as the cops were arriving. People were out in the streets protesting this one as well.
It's the end of the world as we know it.Importantly, I agree that this is the most consequential criminal prosecution in U.S. history. Confronting berserk individuals OD’d on drugs or alcohol is a regular and ordinary occurrence in the life of many cops. Confrontations will be more frequent as drugs become legal and acceptable. A subject being a person of color takes such incidents to a whole new place. This case will live on and on in the minds of the cops and of the public. And we have been promised that racial peace in the U.S. will be more fragile than ever.
I think he is completely wrong on fentanyl. He says 3 is generally considered fatal. Yet a person that studied 2300 blood samples of DUI arrests testified that he found that the AVERAGE blood level for fentanyl was 9 and 1/4 had 11 or higher. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...e-floyd-not-enough-to-cause-death/7239448002/In closing—I agree with John Hinderaker on all counts.
From my casual reading of the trial proceedings I came to the conclusion Chauvin’s defense was very weakly presented. However I wasn’t aware of Eric Nelson’s blunder on closing. No wonder the jury only took as long as it took to choose a foreperson and order lunch to reach a verdict. The defense had two key issues, cause of death and Chauvin’s state of mind. Both must have been more aggressively developed. In fact, the defense theme was a jumbled mess. Nelson was awful. Chauvin did not have effective counsel. But the verdict will never be reversed.
Importantly, I agree that this is the most consequential criminal prosecution in U.S. history. Confronting berserk individuals OD’d on drugs or alcohol is a regular and ordinary occurrence in the life of many cops. Confrontations will be more frequent as drugs become legal and acceptable. A subject being a person of color takes such incidents to a whole new place. This case will live on and on in the minds of the cops and of the public. And we have been promised that racial peace in the U.S. will be more fragile than ever.
It's the end of the world as we know it.
And I feel fine.It's the end of the world as we know it.
Ha. This is what a Harris giggle looks like on the cooler.It's the end of the world as we know it.
Here’s a tweet proving you correct. Imagine being this stupid. I challenge anyone on here who constantly bashes QAnon (for good reason) to explain how this is better?Stupid people always had voices. Social media gave them an amplifier.
Ok, she grew up in Columbia MD which (according to Wikipedia) is "consistently ranked as one of the top 10 places to live in America according to CNN Money". In 2020 it was 5th.Here’s a tweet proving you correct. Imagine being this stupid. I challenge anyone on here who constantly bashes QAnon (for good reason) to explain how this is better?
It's not "better" but it's entirely different. Defunding and abolishing the police is a terrible idea and hardly a solution for anything. It's an approach that has been emphatically rejected by the president of the United States. That's a far cry from a movement, amplified by the former president, that suggests the country is controlled by a cabal of satanic, cannabalistic pedophiles, and promotes other insane conspiracy theories.Here’s a tweet proving you correct. Imagine being this stupid. I challenge anyone on here who constantly bashes QAnon (for good reason) to explain how this is better?
Why is this in your feed and why are you amplifying it?Here’s a tweet proving you correct. Imagine being this stupid. I challenge anyone on here who constantly bashes QAnon (for good reason) to explain how this is better?
Some say amplify some say expose.Why is this in your feed and why are you amplifying it?
Because people need to know who the voices are behind these seemingly righteous movements. These people, like QAnon, are essentially insane. But if you don’t select one of their false choices they will come after you.Why is this in your feed and why are you amplifying it?
Except there a helluva lot more people who would tell Ms. Newsome they agree with everything she says (by virtue signaling) than would ever agree to a QAnon theory.It's not "better" but it's entirely different. Defunding and abolishing the police is a terrible idea and hardly a solution for anything. It's an approach that has been emphatically rejected by the president of the United States. That's a far cry from a movement, amplified by the former president, that suggests the country is controlled by a cabal of satanic, cannabalistic pedophiles, and promotes other insane conspiracy theories.
It's not "better" but it's entirely different. Defunding and abolishing the police is a terrible idea and hardly a solution for anything. It's an approach that has been emphatically rejected by the president of the United States. That's a far cry from a movement, amplified by the former president, that suggests the country is controlled by a cabal of satanic, cannabalistic pedophiles, and promotes other insane conspiracy theories.
There are QAnon supporters who are members of congress.Because people need to know who the voices are behind these seemingly righteous movements. These people, like QAnon, are essentially insane. But if you don’t select one of their false choices they will come after you.
Newsome has 33% more Twitter followers than MTG. If you don’t think that’s a big deal in the youngs’ approach to consuming information you need to get with the program.There are QAnon supporters who are members of congress.
Every single person on here has no Earthy idea who the Hell "Bree Newsome" is, until Googling her. You posting her thoughts would be like digging up a social media post of a random Klansman and saying "look at these crazy Republican ideas"
Here’s a tweet proving you correct. Imagine being this stupid. I challenge anyone on here who constantly bashes QAnon (for good reason) to explain how this is better?
Who gives a damn who Bree Newsime is? Can’t you ever discuss an idea without yapping about whose idea it is? Gawd you are a pea brain. The fact is that we had a crazy person about to plunge a knife into the gut of another person and many are now expressing sympathy for the one wielding the knife. Just a year or so ago the officer would have gotten a medal for saving a life, now his life is ruined—because he is a white guy.There are QAnon supporters who are members of congress.
Every single person on here has no Earthy idea who the Hell "Bree Newsome" is, until Googling her. You posting her thoughts would be like digging up a social media post of a random Klansman and saying "look at these crazy Republican ideas"