B) or C) will be looked at with a skeptical eye, rightly or wrongly. With our recent history, that is understandable. That said, at this point it's all pure speculation. Me, I'd prefer we not find ourselves in an oversign situation, but if we do I will give CAM the benefit of the doubt until such time as I find it's undeserved.
I think everyone should first learn the difference in over-signing, and over-committing. fwiw - This isn't directed at you but the board as a whole.
Teams are allowed to over sign, that is to sign a 14th recruit, though they still need to be down to 13 at the beginning of the season.
That's not what Crean did, it's not what he's famous for and it's not the reason Wisconsin fans coined his actions as Creaning while he was at Marquette. At IU he was only over- signed twice.
Crean over-committed or over-recruited. Which was the act of accepting verbals when the roster was already full and there wasn't enough open spots, or reason to expect open spots, except with transfers.
Basically assuring he would have constant roster turnover. Which he did. It was also the order in which he did it. Most coaches have the awareness to realize letting players go
before replacing them looked better. Crean, well, awareness just isn't his thing.
Other programs over-sign or over-commit once in a while. Iowa and Wisconsin a couple years back. Duke, once or twice. Louisville a few times. Most major programs will over commit one player once in a awhile (generally when they know a player is going pro ) but that's the key, most programs over-commit by one and not every year.
It's very rare for programs to do what Crean did by constantly accepting verbals before spots opened up, rarer still to accept more than one and even rarer still to do it every year.
Crean did it every year but two at IU and almost every year at Marq from 2004 on. One year he had 16 players for 13 spots. The years Crean over-committed we had transfers. Obviously, because we had to have people leave to fit in the new players. This always made us young and inexperienced and made HS and AAU coaches wonder if sending their kids to someone with no loyalty was wise.
That's the act of "Creaning". That was Crean's problem - not over-signing. If these people see Arch over-committed the next 7 of 9 years and by more than just one player, then they can bitch about it and compare him to Crean.
Until then - it's obvious they're people only looking for fault based on their emotional needs, either a love of Crean or just petty attention for themselves. It's not based on any measure of moral integrity, knowledge or intelligence.
Basically, they have very little information,or knowledge. Most don't even know what the issue is (or what a forward is) and they're just whining to whine.
"forwards" .. lol.