ADVERTISEMENT

The oil industry is writing our climate policy

Rockfish1

Hall of Famer
Sep 2, 2001
36,255
6,841
113
Maybe Big Enviro isn't who we should worry about:

When the Trump administration laid out a plan this year that would eventually allow cars to emit more pollution, automakers, the obvious winners from the proposal, balked. The changes, they said, went too far even for them.

But it turns out that there was a hidden beneficiary of the plan that was pushing for the changes all along: the nation’s oil industry.

In Congress, on Facebook and in statehouses nationwide, Marathon Petroleum, the country’s largest refiner, worked with powerful oil-industry groups and a conservative policy network financed by the billionaire industrialist Charles G. Koch to run a stealth campaign to roll back car emissions standards, a New York Times investigation has found.

. . . In recent months, Marathon Petroleum also teamed up with the American Legislative Exchange Council, a secretive policy group financed by corporations as well as the Koch network, to draft legislation for states supporting the industry’s position. Its proposed resolution, dated Sept. 18, describes current fuel-efficiency rules as “a relic of a disproven narrative of resource scarcity” and says “unelected bureaucrats” shouldn’t dictate the cars Americans drive.

A separate industry campaign on Facebook, covertly run by an oil-industry lobby representing Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Phillips 66 and other oil giants, urged people to write to regulators to support the rollback.

The Facebook ads linked to a website with a picture of a grinning Mr. Obama. It asked, “Would YOU buy a used car from this man?” The site appears to have been so effective that a quarter of the 12,000 public comments received by the Department of Transportation can be traced to the petition, according to a Times analysis.

. . . The standards that the Trump administration seeks to weaken required automakers to roughly double the fuel economy of new cars, SUVs and pickup trucks by 2025. Instead, the Trump plan would freeze the standards at 2020 levels. Carmakers, for their part, had sought more flexibility in meeting the original 2025 standards, not a categorical rollback.

The Trump plan, if finalized, would increase greenhouse gas emissions in the United States by more than the amount many midsize countries put out in a year and reverse a major effort by the Obama administration to fight climate change.

The energy industry’s efforts also help explain the Trump administration’s confrontational stance toward California, which, under federal law, has a unique authority to write its own clean-air rules and to mandate more zero-emissions vehicles.

California has pledged to stick to the stricter standards, together with 13 other states that follow its lead. But President Trump’s plan challenges California’s rule-writing power, setting up a legal battle that threatens to split the American auto market in two.

That is a prospect automakers desperately want to avoid.

But for gasoline producers like Marathon, a shift toward more efficient vehicles poses a grave threat to the bottom line.

. . . On a conference call with investors last week, Mr. Heminger, the Marathon chief executive, was already counting the extra barrels of fuel a Trump rollback would mean for the industry: 350,000 to 400,000 barrels of gasoline per day, he said.
Those hydrocarbons won't make energy companies any money unless they're extracted from the ground and burned into the air. Hence Republican climate denial.

To the extent this isn't already clear, history will say that the "science" supporting climate denial came from our day's equivalent of the Tobacco Institute. I wouldn't want to be the last dupe to figure this out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUPaterade724
This wouldn't make sense commercially if they were only to sell cars for example, domestically. But the likes of Ford and GM sell globally and they certainly cant afford to build two platforms in light of the pervasive Euro standards globally.

I suspect the Big Oil companies are just trying to buy time to allow them to build alternative/green energy revenue sources. As mature companies as they are, they tend to work at a glacial pace as opposed to start-ups.
Everyone in the oil industry knows that the shallow water/cheap extraction fields are almost all out unless you go to the more inclement areas like Siberia or the Poles.
They need breathing room to develop the few of parallel revenue tracks -- ramp up green energy revenue streams, extract small pocket/residual older fields (new technology are being developed to make it cost-effective) and the climatically unfriendly fields.
 
Kind of like lawyers writing laws that benefit themselves day after day year after year huh? Pot meet kettle.
 
The tobacco comparison is so spot on perfect. Our grandkids will hate us, but we do not care. Burn coal, pollute, and drive for tomorrow's generation fries.
 
Kind of like lawyers writing laws that benefit themselves day after day year after year huh? Pot meet kettle.
stooges.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT