Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know about Italy or Iran, but let's be honest. The huge increase in cases in the U.S. is almost entirely the result of the fact that we are finally testing on a large scale.
You think that's the reason that India is so low with all their population or are they just not releasing stats. I still have a hard time believing stats from China (I hope they are correct). I was just reading this article about them maneuvering to take advantage of the situation. Of course Trump has done nothing to improve our standing.... he's too busy patting himself on the back.I don't know about Italy or Iran, but let's be honest. The huge increase in cases in the U.S. is almost entirely the result of the fact that we are finally testing on a large scale.
That and all the stuff that's spread about it that are absolute lies. People forward these stupid emails and never bother to see if what they are forwarding are facts.That's such a dumb chart.... I'm embarrassed for the idiot that put it together. The things that are wrong with that are too numerous to list. This kind of crap is why drives hysteria. Do better NYT.
Number one pet peeve.... all of these data points should be confirmed "cases per capita"..... not absolute numbers.
And even that is worthless....as the levels of testing done is widely different from country to country.
Here some good stuff from an actual data scientist.....
Wow... Thanks.... that is a very interesting read. I haven't seen anything else as good as that.Number one pet peeve.... all of these data points should be confirmed "cases per capita"..... not absolute numbers.
And even that is worthless....as the levels of testing done is widely different from country to country.
Here some good stuff from an actual data scientist.....
Has the appearance of a quality analysis but he conveniently and selectively ignores inconsistencies in testing as a factor undermining all the “data” he’s using. That doesn’t mean his conclusions are wrong, just that they’re not as well founded as he wants us to believe.More actual data analysis.......or an analysis of the lack of data......
A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17...e-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/
More actual data analysis.......or an analysis of the lack of data......
A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17...e-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/
Police officers in Bloomington were able to get a test. I’m not complaining about that though. As much as they interact with public, they should. Two were tested two weeks ago and came back negative.as of a couple days ago, you can't even get a test in Indiana, even if you have some symptoms, unless you,
A), have just returned from one of the more infected countries,
B), have had contact with someone who has already tested positive. (catch 22, which is unlikely since virtually no one has access to a test).
Police officers in Bloomington were able to get a test. I’m not complaining about that though. As much as they interact with public, they should. Two were tested two weeks ago and came back negative.
Agreed. And from the OP’s post it’s almost like he’s happy it’s happening to own the Trumpers.That's such a dumb chart.... I'm embarrassed for the idiot that put it together. The things that are wrong with that are too numerous to list. This kind of crap is why drives hysteria. Do better NYT.
And if you're wrong -- personal responsibility or not -- others may suffer. That's why "personal" responsibility isn't enough. Viruses don't give a shit about Horatio Alger or Ayn Rand.I'm generally in the personal responsibility camp. The first and best line of defense is what we do ourselves to keep well. If we want to isolate ourselves, we have that option.
Police officers in Bloomington were able to get a test. I’m not complaining about that though. As much as they interact with public, they should. Two were tested two weeks ago and came back negative.
Agreed. And from the OP’s post it’s almost like he’s happy it’s happening to own the Trumpers.
And if you're wrong -- personal responsibility or not -- others may suffer. That's why "personal" responsibility isn't enough. Viruses don't give a shit about Horatio Alger or Ayn Rand.
Great read.More actual data analysis.......or an analysis of the lack of data......
A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17...e-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/
You think that's the reason that India is so low with all their population or are they just not releasing stats. I still have a hard time believing stats from China (I hope they are correct). I was just reading this article about them maneuvering to take advantage of the situation. Of course Trump has done nothing to improve our standing.... he's too busy patting himself on the back.
Why isn't the quarantine working in Italy?
They took down the article. Can you summarize?Wow... Thanks.... that is a very interesting read. I haven't seen anything else as good as that.
Why isn't the quarantine working in Italy?
More actual data analysis.......or an analysis of the lack of data......
A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17...e-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/
Bernie approves this message.Cuba apparently sending medical professions to help Italy's crisis.
This really isn't hard.You can't blow your wad too early as anyone can tell you.
It has to be incrementally escalated.
More actual data analysis.......or an analysis of the lack of data......
A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17...e-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/
On a serious note, you should not do lockdowns too early. It's just not possible to sustain. Then what after 2 months? Martial law? You cant blow your wad too early as anyone can tell you.
It has to be incrementally escalated.
You'll get more knowledgeable as you watch your parents decline and ultimately pass. The conditions you mentionOne thing I'm having a difficult time understanding concerns the number of people that are reported to die from this particular virus. The most susceptible are the ones most likely to be dying, regardless of the virus or now...the immune compromised and the old. How do they know if it's the virus that killed them? People die of pneumonia all the time. People with congestive heart failure get edema on the lungs and die. They listed an 80+ year old today as being a Covid-19 victim. They go on to say he had cancer for 15 years and battled COPD during this same time. I assume when anyone dies now, they do a virus test. They tell us it can be in our system severals days without symptoms, obviously not yet strong enough to kill us. So if the old man with CA and COPD dies, how can they count him as a virus death without really knowing? During this last month...all these thousands of people thinking they might have it, how many test negative for the C-19 virus, but positive for normal flu or the simple rhino cold virus? How many people with normal flu (non C-19) have died during this same period? Shouldn't they have these numbers together so we can judge just how virulent this booger really is in comparison? Maybe for all we know, more people are dying of just regular old flu than actually succumb to C-19 (or so they report for sensationalism, perhaps). This whole thing just seems a little peculiar to me. Even our Commander in Chief recently intimated something about let's not let the cure be worse than the disease. What's really going on here?
how do you know when "too soon" is?
that said, saying lockdowns are unsustainable isn't really accurate.
if the sht starts hitting the fan, and people we know of even remotely die or need a respirator, "sustainability" will greatly increase.
Anne Frank might have an opinion on this.
last night Amy Klobuchar looked like she was fighting back the tears and speaking in a broken voice, due to her husband being hospitalized with it.
as time goes by, this could hit home with those for whom it hasn't yet.
My folks died years ago. I'm high risk category at age 69, myself. It's trying to find me now, as we "speak". So with your stage 1 lung CA analogy, what stage of CA can we say a person dies of this CA vs. dying of Covid-19, which may only be in "stage 1" but still on the news is reported as a death by virus. See what I mean, the difficulty of accurate statistics when it comes to epidemiological "cause of death" in a society?You'll get more knowledgeable as you watch your parents decline and ultimately pass. The conditions you mention
are scored on a continuum. For example no one dies from stage 1 lung cancer.
Of course China cannot be trusted. We must trust what our president says. Right, stoll?The stats are useless. China can’t be trusted at all. Testing isn’t consistent in all countries.