Scott Drew should strongly be considered
- Thread starter secondasky
- Start date
I tried to watch Baylor play, but their jerseys hurt my eyes too much. A highlighter factory exploded, apparently. Remember when TVs has a handy "tint" knob? I needed one.
I though Purdue's "dryer lint gray" uniforms a few years back were bad, but Baylor gives us a new standard in ugly. Michigan wore some similar day-glo yellow unis a few years back, but thankfully they stopped.
As to Scott, most think he's more than a little dirty.
I though Purdue's "dryer lint gray" uniforms a few years back were bad, but Baylor gives us a new standard in ugly. Michigan wore some similar day-glo yellow unis a few years back, but thankfully they stopped.
As to Scott, most think he's more than a little dirty.
Maybe we should've let Drew have Hanner back then . . . .
Wasn't Scott Drew once voted one of the most likely to be a cheater by other college coaches? He certainly has a rather tainted reputation. Just what IU does not need to be involved with and I am sure they realize that.
TC finished second in a similar poll, even I don't think TC was any dirtier than every other coach...point being those polls can't always be taken as gospel
I don't believe they currently are. They were, though, for a couple of years under Drew.
That article is about the football team. Drew did have them on probation, but that expired.
That article is 15yrs old, I doubt if they're still on probation from those issues
The football program domestic assault issues grows bigger and bigger by the week. What if those issue expand past the football program into other sports. If I were IU I'd stay away and if I were Scott Drew, I'd get away. Maybe go to Washington in the northwest and rebuild that program to distance himself from Baylor. Ok. St. maybe?
I didn't go to Purdue but that is 5 years old. Did you hear the AD say no history of NCAA violations.
Sorry I misread it as 02, not 12 but you said they were on probation....if google is such a good friend of yours why can't you find anything to back up your claim.
No one is saying he hasn't had issues, we called bs on your claim about being on probation right niw
They were on probation for 3 years.
http://collegebasketball.ap.org/article/ncaa-puts-baylor-basketball-3-years-probation
http://collegebasketball.ap.org/article/ncaa-puts-baylor-basketball-3-years-probation
You said they were on probation...so are they currently on probation? It would be a lot easier if you'd just admit that you misspoke. It's not a big deal, your distraction defense has done nothing but prove that you were wrong and drag this out
You said they were currently on probation. They are not. And now you're just trying to spin it so you don't look stupid, it's not working.
I saw an article yesterday that said they self-reported something else but now I can't see it. Doesn't matter. AD said no history of NCAA violations. He has a large history of NCAA violations.
I think large is subjective, but at least you've kinda admitted that you were wrong. I don't care what their AD said, it has no bearing on anything that we are discussing
Our AD. Fred Glass said we wouldn't hire anyone with a history of NCAA violations.
Was that in his initial statement on TC being fired? Yes I googled but couldn't find it
Similar threads
