Russian Bounties on U.S. Soldiers

[FarvaIDontWannaLarge]

U.S. Intel Walks Back Claim Russians Put Bounties on American Troops

REUTERSIt was a blockbuster story about Russia’s return to the imperial “Great Game” in Afghanistan. The Kremlin had spread money around the longtime central Asian battlefield for militants to kill remaining U.S. forces. It sparked a massive outcry from Democrats and their #resistance amplifiers...

news.yahoo.com

Maybe not. Is there single Biden campaign attack on Trump that they haven't had to walk back?

Border security, Russian bounties, Hunter report bogus.

When you look at the criticism of Trump at least half of it is/was completely dishonest, no?

 

[Hoopsdoc1978]

Shocking turn of events.

Said absolutely no one.

 

[Morrison]

U.S. Intel Walks Back Claim Russians Put Bounties on American Troops

REUTERSIt was a blockbuster story about Russia’s return to the imperial “Great Game” in Afghanistan. The Kremlin had spread money around the longtime central Asian battlefield for militants to kill remaining U.S. forces. It sparked a massive outcry from Democrats and their #resistance amplifiers...

news.yahoo.com

Maybe not. Is there single Biden campaign attack on Trump that they haven't had to walk back?

Border security, Russian bounties, Hunter report bogus.

When you look at the criticism of Trump at least half of it is/was completely dishonest, no?

Trump being an incompetent, narcissist, pathologically lying, racist, anti democratic, horrible human being, will never have to be walked back. For the 10% of voters than decide presidential elections, they vote on the character of the person and and not much else.

 

[FarvaIDontWannaLarge]

Trump being an incompetent, narcissist, pathologically lying, racist, anti democratic, horrible human being, will never have to be walked back. For the 10% of voters than decide presidential elections, they vote on the character of the person and and not much else.

Oh, you're a part of the mean adjective strings gang. Say hello to Hickory and Zekes for me. Ya'll are super creative and emphatic.

Yours and others low opinion of Trump does not grant license for dishonest smears.

Just like our collective low opinion of Russia shouldn't grant us license for dishonest smears.

It undermines real criticisms by muddying the waters.

 

[mcmurtry66]

Oh, you're a part of the mean adjective strings gang. Say hello to Hickory and Zekes for me. Ya'll are super creative and emphatic.

Yours and others low opinion of Trump does not grant license for dishonest smears.

Just like our collective low opinion of Russia shouldn't grant us license for dishonest smears.

It undermines real criticisms by muddying the waters.

Morrison isn’t in the same universe as zeke or history

 

[Morrison]

Oh, you're a part of the mean adjective strings gang. Say hello to Hickory and Zekes for me. Ya'll are super creative and emphatic.

Yours and others low opinion of Trump does not grant license for dishonest smears.

Just like our collective low opinion of Russia shouldn't grant us license for dishonest smears.

It undermines real criticisms by muddying the waters.

I actually held off on a few more adjectives so not to join the club. Looks like I failed.

I do not engage in dishonest smears. I believe what I said about Trump’s character. Obviously, you disagree.

I’m heartened that you have a low opinion of Russia and see them as still fighting the Cold War. The current Republican Party sees them as fine and dandy, because Trump.

I agree with your last statement wholeheartedly. The intelligence services need to get their shit together.

 

[UncleMark]

I agree with your last statement wholeheartedly. The intelligence services need to get their shit together.

What's confusing to me is why is this somehow a Biden/Democrat failing? It was the Trump IC community who put this out originally, and it's the BIden IC community who is now saying it wasn't what was originally made out to be.

Of course, if you read beyond the headline, what you'll find is that the statement regarding the bounties was in response to questions about the new sanctions, and why the bounties weren't included among the reasons for them. It's not like this revised finding was announced independently.

 

[mrhighlife]

What's confusing to me is why is this somehow a Biden/Democrat failing? It was the Trump IC community who put this out originally, and it's the BIden IC community who is now saying it wasn't what was originally made out to be.

Of course, if you read beyond the headline, what you'll find is that the statement regarding the bounties was in response to questions about the new sanctions, and why the bounties weren't included among the reasons for them. It's not like this revised finding was announced independently.

Why do you constantly muddy things with blatantly obvious facts?

 

[Morrison]

Morrison isn’t in the same universe as zeke or history

I’m just trying to create a lane from the middle in the primary for Mod. 😊 I’m thinking of pulling my endorsement of Mark. Maybe Bulk can be my Jim Clyburn. Of course Goat could end it with his endorsement of Mark. That’s on par with Obama putting his finger on the scale.

 

[mcmurtry66]

I’m just trying to create a lane from the middle in the primary for Mod. 😊 I’m thinking of pulling my endorsement of Mark. Maybe Bulk can be my Jim Clyburn. Of course Goat could end it with his endorsement of Mark. That’s on par with Obama putting his finger on the scale.

yeah i endorsed mark, and almost immediately regretted it. i'm still technically endorsing him but know it's a mistake i'll regret.

 

[Morrison]

yeah i endorsed mark, and almost immediately regretted it. i'm still technically endorsing him but know it's a mistake i'll regret.

It’s hard running from the middle as I have to act like I’m opposed to Mark’s platform of allowing provocative photos, and banning ratards. It’s a tough business!

 

[mcmurtry66]

It’s hard running from the middle as I have to act like I’m opposed to Mark’s platform of allowing provocative photos, and banning ratards. It’s a tough business!

and honestly from that route courtsense is the only vote you can count on

 

[UncleMark]

It’s hard running from the middle as I have to act like I’m opposed to Mark’s platform of allowing provocative photos, and banning ratards. It’s a tough business!

I'm a regular man of the people.

 

[UncleMark]

and honestly from that route courtsense is the only vote you can count on

@Courtsensetwo has been sitting on the fence so long it's embedded in his ass crack.

 

[mcmurtry66]

@Courtsensetwo has been sitting on the fence so long it's embedded in his ass crack.

We’re very lucky to have him

 

[UncleMark]

We’re very lucky to have him

@Morrison can have his vote. I've got the unwashed masses locked up.

 

[mcmurtry66]

@Morrison can have his vote. I've got the unwashed masses locked up.

Frightening

 

[DrHoops]

What's confusing to me is why is this somehow a Biden/Democrat failing? It was the Trump IC community who put this out originally, and it's the BIden IC community who is now saying it wasn't what was originally made out to be.

Of course, if you read beyond the headline, what you'll find is that the statement regarding the bounties was in response to questions about the new sanctions, and why the bounties weren't included among the reasons for them. It's not like this revised finding was announced independently.

This has Hunter Biden’s fingerprints all over it!

 

[Cortez88]

@Courtsensetwo has been sitting on the fence so long it's embedded in his ass crack.

Yeah but his is a high fence which allows him to look down upon everyone else.

 

[UncleMark]

Frightening

MWCGA

 

[Courtsensetwo]

@Courtsensetwo has been sitting on the fence so long it's embedded in his ass crack.

Good view of the idiots on both sides from my lofty perch.

 

[DrHoops]

That story came out in June of last year:

More U.S. officials say intel on Russian bounties wasn't conclusive

But the debate over that narrow issue obscures a larger consensus. U.S. intel agencies have long assessed that Russia backs our enemies in Afghanistan.

www.google.com

Top US general says Russian bounty intelligence 'wasn't proved' but 'proved enough to worry me'

The top US general overseeing operations in the Middle East and Afghanistan said Tuesday that the intelligence concerning Russian operatives offering bounties to Taliban-linked militants was "very worrisome" but that the information wasn't solid enough to hold up in a court of law.

www.google.com

Also, in your own article it said they had “moderate” confidence that it was true. What this has to do with Joe Biden, I have no idea.

 

[FarvaIDontWannaLarge]

What's confusing to me is why is this somehow a Biden/Democrat failing? It was the Trump IC community who put this out originally, and it's the BIden IC community who is now saying it wasn't what was originally made out to be.

Of course, if you read beyond the headline, what you'll find is that the statement regarding the bounties was in response to questions about the new sanctions, and why the bounties weren't included among the reasons for them. It's not like this revised finding was announced independently.

You’re being purposely obtuse. The line of attack was that Trump is buddy, buddy with Vlad so of course he would look the other way.

Trump/ Vlad was always a disingenuous line of attack with no evidence behind it. You’re smarter than this.