Very cool. An appropriately emotional response from a bot. Those damn Russkies are good.
Y'all keep forgetting that had the hacks of the DNC and Podesta emails revealed wedding photos and yoga tutorials they wouldn't have mattered. Had Clinton not deleted those communications in the first place, there would likely have been no interest from wikileaks. It is a tangled web, indeed, woven once Hillary chose to deceive. The obsession by everyone in the left with Russia is entertaining, but is getting your party nowhere. So, carry on, I suppose?
I think the DNC-favored-Hillary stuff confirmed to the Never-Hillary crowd that she was unscrupulous and power-mad. Perhaps not surprising among politicians, and certainly overblown, but a direct consequence of her deleting emails she had been directed to turn over.
So the emails confirmed that some within the Democratic National Committee preferred the Democrat in the Democratic primary. That was the most important scandal the emails revealed?
But it was above-board. The only reason it's a story is because idiots on the right are grasping at anything "Clinton!...Russia!..." to deflect away from the Mueller investigation.
Interesting to see this being summarily whitewashed by your side. It's not surprising which candidate the DNC officers preferred. The problem is when they manipulated the process in favor of Clinton, while continuing to maintain the appearance that the membership and donors who supported Bernie were participating in a fair contest. After all 'fair' is the domain of the left, is it not?
The Clinton's got $500k and $145 m in CGI donations. That doesn't smell fishy to you?
It's not being whitewashed. There's literally no scandal there to whitewash. It was just normal government business.
No, because I'm smart enough to recognize that a charity and a campaign fund are two separate things.
Then you're positive the sources of and the circumstances surrounding all that money are legit and totally unrelated to negotiating the sale of control of all of that uranium to a 'hostile state'.
I'm positive you have zero evidence to suggest it is. I generally follow the "innocent until proven guilty" maxim, a maxim that has never applied to the Clintons as far as conservatives are concerned.
True and true, but there is exactly the same amount of hard evidence against the Clintons as Mueller has shown on Trump so far, but that doesn't preclude thousands of posts here stating how guilty he is.
Perhaps, but you'll be hard pressed to find a post where I have stated that Trump himself is guilty of anything (other than things he's actually admitted to, like sexual assault). There's a lot more smoke around his campaign than there ever was around HRC, but it's still just smoke, and we* haven't identified where the fires are. Could be the three guys already charged are as far as it goes. Could be forty more people get indicted. We just don't know yet.
To be clear, that's not to say I don't have an opinion on the matter. I think it's very likely that people very high in the Trump organization violated some laws. There's way too much smoke surrounding the casino collapse and reinvigoration of Trump real estate investments with Russian funds to not have something there. Trump himself? DJT Jr.? Kushner? Someone else? I don't know, but I'll be shocked if Mueller doesn't find someone in the Trump organization committed at least some financial crimes.
What is being whitewashed? How did the DNC "manipulate[] the process in favor of Clinton"?
I don't believe you have any idea what the facts of the Uranium One matter actually are.
CO. is engaged in wingnut fever swampery. The entire Uranium One controversy is unadulterated bullshit. (More here and here.) Everything must be Benghazi! with these guys. It's stupid.
The whitewashing is the asignation by your side of "business as usual" status to deception and shenanigans within your party which caused at least the ouster of its chairperson, and possibly defrauded it's own electorate. Then through crocodile tears you rail against Trump claiming he has sullied the sanctity of the great American election process. Hillary was the most qualified candidate who ever ran for president, so since she lost, it must be because Russia, and not because she's a dishonest slimeball who people don't really like all that much.
What deception? Which shenanigans? What electoral fraud? You're just throwing shit at the wall now.
Hold on. I can't keep up with the bouncing around. I thought originally you were accusing Uranium One of being whitewashed. Now it's the primary? Two separate issues.
The difference I see is that very few will defend Trump's behavior and connections with the "nothing to see here" refrain Hillary defenders keep singing, but she keeps tracking muddy footprints all over the place, and we are told it's not her fault, but a vast right-wing conspiracy against her.
LOL.
What muddy footprints? This is the issue. You're being fed crap by right-wing blogs that there's something there, but there's nothing there. It's a fake scandal.
What muddy footprints? There's literally nothing to what you're saying.
As long as she keeps popping up like a Wac-a-Mole, there will be folks looking for a hammer. I'd be fine if she would just fade away.
