Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what an interesting concept! Listening to what ordinary citizens are concerned about as opposed to what people who give the biggest campaign donations are concerned about.
dumb ....what an interesting concept! Listening to what ordinary citizens are concerned about as opposed to what people who give the biggest campaign donations are concerned about.
I like this idea. I think treating elected office like a heightened version of jury duty has some merit. It's a situation where you temporarily leave your job as a lawyer, farmer, accountant, etc, serve your term and then go back to your job. It would seem that having to go back to your 'real life, everyday' peers probably builds in a level of accountability.I had read about "lottocracy" before the election. The idea is to select random people to serve on a three-year single-issue governing boards. https://www.nj.com/opinion/2019/03/...-choose-our-political-leaders-by-lottery.html
I wonder, could a group of random Americans not worried at all about re-election or being hired as lobbyists sit down and solve Social Security? I don't know that it could work worse than what we have.
Not exactly the same thing, but the ACA authorized an Independent Payment Advisory Board that could enact changes to Medicare that could only be stopped by a Congressional super-majority. The idea was to de-politicize Medicare payment cuts necessary to keep the program solvent by turning those decisions over to an independent body of experts.I had read about "lottocracy" before the election. The idea is to select random people to serve on a three-year single-issue governing boards. https://www.nj.com/opinion/2019/03/...-choose-our-political-leaders-by-lottery.html
I wonder, could a group of random Americans not worried at all about re-election or being hired as lobbyists sit down and solve Social Security? I don't know that it could work worse than what we have.
So you're automatically excluding Trumpsters?A group of random amercians not beholden to anyone would be an interesting idea. Would probably require background checks and probably an IQ test.
And lawyers?So you're automatically excluding Trumpsters?
There's a morality test too???And lawyers?
That bar may be too high...probably need to start with a simple blood temperature test.There's a morality test too???
Most lawyers are overpriced and seem dishonest. But one told me this one: What would you like a lawyer do that a swan can do, a goose can almost do but a duck can’t do? Stick his bill up his a$$.And lawyers?