ADVERTISEMENT

Rent Relief?

Presidents exceeding their authority is not a new thing, but Presidents doing it after previously acknowledging they did not legally have that power (Obama with DACA, Biden with eviction moratorium etc) is really an obvious violation of their oath and quite corrupt.
 
I never said it was a black problem.

Your comments are alwaystoxic and partisan.

If folks like you had not been intentionally lying to poor people for the last 60 years, they’d be much better off. You just want votes and don’t care if the poor stay poor. Shame on you.
Of course you claim it, and I'm sure you've said it, if not here then somewhere else. How do I know? You're a Republican, racism is in your DNA.

My comments seem toxic and partisan to you because they are the truth. You aren't used to hearing that.
 
Sure would like to hear from some of the people that insisted Biden would protect norms and institutions as President....
It's pretty simple. He will issue the moratorium, then if the Supreme Court rules it is unconstitutional, he will honor that. He will not send a mob to break into the Supreme Court Building in an attempt to overturn the ruling. In that way, norms and institutions will be protected.
 
It's pretty simple. He will issue the moratorium, then if the Supreme Court rules it is unconstitutional, he will honor that. He will not send a mob to break into the Supreme Court Building in an attempt to overturn the ruling. In that way, norms and institutions will be protected.
A President admitting, as he did, that he is violating the Constitution and his oath of office because he likes the policy outcomes is quite corrupt.
 
It's pretty simple. He will issue the moratorium, then if the Supreme Court rules it is unconstitutional, he will honor that. He will not send a mob to break into the Supreme Court Building in an attempt to overturn the ruling. In that way, norms and institutions will be protected.

The SC already did just that, numbskull! Good lord.
 
Presidents exceeding their authority is not a new thing, but Presidents doing it after previously acknowledging they did not legally have that power (Obama with DACA, Biden with eviction moratorium etc) is really an obvious violation of their oath and quite corrupt.
Should be grounds for impeachment, but no - let's impeach a President over a phone call.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Of course you claim it, and I'm sure you've said it, if not here then somewhere else. How do I know? You're a Republican, racism is in your DNA.

My comments seem toxic and partisan to you because they are the truth. You aren't used to hearing that.
1Toothfeller claiming he's telling the truth while claiming Republicans have racist DNA.

Stunning in its stupidity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lucy01
Should be grounds for impeachment, but no - let's impeach a President over a phone call.
But, really, don't you think it had something to do with the content of the call? You know, the part where he tried to force a foreign government to intervene on his behalf in a US presidential election.
 
I never said it was a black problem.

Your comments are alwaystoxic and partisan.

If folks like you had not been intentionally lying to poor people for the last 60 years, they’d be much better off. You just want votes and don’t care if the poor stay poor. Shame on you.
The democrats made the problems of poor in inner cities with the promise of government give away programs.
 
A President admitting, as he did, that he is violating the Constitution and his oath of office because he likes the policy outcomes is quite corrupt.
I know, right? Who does he think he is, to see if the Supreme Court will let him prevent millions from becoming homeless. Such corruption!
 
But, really, don't you think it had something to do with the content of the call? You know, the part where he tried to force a foreign government to intervene on his behalf in a US presidential election.
You mean like Biden said IN A NEWS CONFERENCE to dump the prosecutor or he'd withhold authrozied US taxpayer funds?

Except Biden actually did it and Trump only did it in your head.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Walk up the basement steps, go into the main house and ask your parents if they've had problems paying their bills over the past year. Report back here with what you find.
That wasn’t an answer! Your reply is a mirror of you 1 toothlessfeller a nothing burger!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
So only 3 billion of the $46 billion has been sought/dispersed by the combo of incompetent state governments/ignorant tenants.

Why don't they just approach it from the other end ONLY? Make/allow the landlords who are OWED the money apply for the money before an eviction can be implemented. That way the money goes to the rightful recipient (not a casino or drug dealer) EVERY time, and nobody gets evicted for back-rent only either. And you bet your ass the landlords WILL apply. The only folks they will toss out if they can get the money are the troublemakers who do worse than just get behind on rent.

Your welcome.

there is no logical reason that this is necessary right now. The CDC is blatantly abusing its power

 


The same CDC that can barely figure out which way is up without botching their direction chart apparently has unlimited power to do whatever they want as long as they say it is covered under vague quarantine laws according to the Biden administration.
 
I know, right? Who does he think he is, to see if the Supreme Court will let him prevent millions from becoming homeless. Such corruption!
The goal here isn't to change one eviction. That's what makes it so transparently corrupt and political. It's so Biden can tell Cori Bush and company that the courts made them do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stollcpa
Will Biden step in to support landlords who have obeyed the eviction rules and have seen their properties torn to shit with no ability to retain damage deposits?
 
there is no logical reason that this is necessary right now. The CDC is blatantly abusing its power

One thing the Trump years showed me is that our government agencies that I always assumed were independent and non partisan are neither.

The CDC is just a tool of the Biden Administration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
you should try evicting a former horse farm employee whose compensation included living in a house on the property

it’s easier to build a boat with gravel
People may have forgotten that in about 2008-09 courts (not officeholders) imposed their own quasi-moratoriums on foreclosures because they were swamped with foreclosure cases.

They did things like require lenders to take time for mediation and settlement discussions before scheduling hearings 2-3 years in the future. Not at all the quicky foreclosure procedures the lenders were used to.

I would assume there are tons of defaulted renters right now, so I wouldn't be surprised if courts did something like this again.
 
People may have forgotten that in about 2008-09 courts (not officeholders) imposed their own quasi-moratoriums on foreclosures because they were swamped with foreclosure cases.

They did things like require lenders to take time for mediation and settlement discussions before scheduling hearings 2-3 years in the future. Not at all the quicky foreclosure procedures the lenders were used to.

I would assume there are tons of defaulted renters right now, so I wouldn't be surprised if courts did something like this again.
In many places that sheriffs have to serve them will be the biggest delay. Not enough sheriffs to go around. Foreclosures and evictions arent comparable tho. Rent and possession takes two minutes in court
 
  • Like
Reactions: twenty02
People may have forgotten that in about 2008-09 courts (not officeholders) imposed their own quasi-moratoriums on foreclosures because they were swamped with foreclosure cases.

They did things like require lenders to take time for mediation and settlement discussions before scheduling hearings 2-3 years in the future. Not at all the quicky foreclosure procedures the lenders were used to.

I would assume there are tons of defaulted renters right now, so I wouldn't be surprised if courts did something like this again.

Nonsense. Taking someone's property via a judicial foreclosure is miles away from kicking out a deadbeat renter, that typically takes one hearing in township court and about 10 mins. Judge.... "did you pay the rent as agreed?".... tenant...."blah, blah blah, bullshit....."

Judge approves eviction.

That's even if deadbeat shows up, which is pretty rare.

Obviously other states are extremely anti-landlord and have all kinds of mechanisms for deadbeat losers to dodge their responsibility for a simple lease arrangement. But in the state of Indiana, you pay or you're gone.

Fortunately many Indiana judges are basically ignoring the CDC unconstitutional moratorium, and giving property owners much leeway.
 
Nonsense. Taking someone's property via a judicial foreclosure is miles away from kicking out a deadbeat renter, that typically takes one hearing in township court and about 10 mins. Judge.... "did you pay the rent as agreed?".... tenant...."blah, blah blah, bullshit....."

Judge approves eviction.

That's even if deadbeat shows up, which is pretty rare.

Obviously other states are extremely anti-landlord and have all kinds of mechanisms for deadbeat losers to dodge their responsibility for a simple lease arrangement. But in the state of Indiana, you pay or you're gone.

Fortunately many Indiana judges are basically ignoring the CDC unconstitutional moratorium, and giving property owners much leeway.
Stl too. "He says you didnt pay for the last 4 months. Do you have receipts showing you did?"
"No"
"You have ten days to get out"

Done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jet812
Stl too. "He says you didnt pay for the last 4 months. Do you have receipts showing you did?"
"No"
"You have ten days to get out"

Done.

It's not a complicated process. In most states.... I've heard some horror stories out west with clients that have dealt with sophisticated squatters that have basically stolen their property with never- ending evasion techniques.

That said, I'm slowly extracting myself from my rental portfolio. I'll take my equity that's built up nicely over the last 10-20 years and dump it into the stock market and my own personal consumption, rather than play this game any longer.

The trends politicaly are obvious and they aren't positive towards mom and pop landlords. The result will be large private equity firms taking over the rental real estate market. I'm sure they will care a lot about their tenants and improving the local neighborhood. This will be the big win for dimwits like Cori Bush.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT