This strikes me as soft censorship of the artist’s work. I’m not necessarily against it, if that many people need their hand held through life, but I find it unnecessary.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We all remember first goin' to see them TALKIES.You saw GWTW in the theater? What are you...100 years old?
An interesting exercise is to ask if a given story, for example GWTW, would be viewed as problematic if that problem (e.g., racism) didn’t exist in society? In other words, can one watch the movie and simply see each actor as an individual, a person, a character in the story?Do you think the test really is whether “certain images or words might be offensive”? If so we aren’t in the same ball park. Does the message promote or perpetuate racism is the test I’m applying. Can the latter be fixed with a disclaimer? The former doesn’t need a disclaimer in my view.
A movie with the universal villain is much more easily scripted and is less likely to get bad reviews. There is no neo-Nazi public support group for the producer to satisfy.Really? Why do you think it was changed? I remember both the book and the film (which was awful), but I don't remember any discussions about why they changed the villains.
So it sells, isn't that the point of a major movie? Art house movies may be different, but the expensive movies are made to simply make money.A movie with the universal villain is much more easily scripted and is less likely to get bad reviews. There is no neo-Nazi public support group for the producer to satisfy.
It's better than cancelling but it's just a bunch elites telling us what is RIGHT so I would never pay any attention to it.After the hullaballoo over Gone with the Wind last year, which gave a couple of posters here likely permanent butt injuries, TCM has rolled out a whole series following HBO's example. A large number of movies will not be removed, but rather aired with appended discussion meant to give context to the aspects that make these films "problematic classics," that is, undeniably parts of our cultural heritage that can't be ignored, but nevertheless containing content that is clearly rooted in accepted prejudices of the time.
My question: How do those of you on both sides feel about this? If you find yourself more sympathetic to the people who are troubled by these classics, do you think the effort at adding historical context gets the job done? If you are rather on the side of being more bothered by "cancel culture," do you think this is an acceptable substitute?
Worst date in my life was when a young woman talked me into going to see Gone With the Wind. Movie was OK, but a four hour date sitting in a dark theater was just too much to take.
We have warnings that movies have sexual content, violence, smoking, flashing lights, etc. I think a brief explanation makes sense. Even more sense than cancelling, letting people know how/why a portrayal is wrong is a great idea. I do not think most Americans are historically aware especially concerning this subject.
This strikes me as soft censorship of the artist’s work. I’m not necessarily against it, if that many people need their hand held through life, but I find it unnecessary.
Who was the poster who came on here several months ago and tried to claim that, for the most part, slaves had it pretty good (fed, sheltered, free medical care, etc), and were pretty happy, as evidenced by their constant singing while working?People are not historically aware that slavery was bad? I have a hard time believing that.
So it sells, isn't that the point of a major movie? Art house movies may be different, but the expensive movies are made to simply make money.
In my southern Indiana grammar schooling, the horror that was slavery was "softened" to a great extent. It was likened to indentured servitude, and many slaveholders were said to be benevolent in their own best interest -- happy, well treated slaves were better producers.People are not historically aware that slavery was bad? I have a hard time believing that.
Accuro?Who was the poster who came on here several months ago and tried to claim that, for the most part, slaves had it pretty good (fed, sheltered, free medical care, etc), and were pretty happy, as evidenced by their constant singing while working?
one of my favorite posts on the board. it's important to remember that many slaves were a certain personality type in search of an adventure!Who was the poster who came on here several months ago and tried to claim that, for the most part, slaves had it pretty good (fed, sheltered, free medical care, etc), and were pretty happy, as evidenced by their constant singing while working?
This strikes me as soft censorship of the artist’s work. I’m not necessarily against it, if that many people need their hand held through life, but I find it unnecessary.
You're really doubling down on the whole being offended thing. You might want to think about taking a walk or something.I dunno. In many ways the disclaimer offends me more than the portrayal of slavery in GWTW. The disclaimer insults my intelligence. The disclaimer is condescending. It is arrogant. I see a sniveling broadcaster trying to satisfy a narrative while hiding under their desk. Either slow the movie or don’t show it. Don’t apologize either way or weaken your good faith informed decisions. All the disclaimer tells me is that we have one more industry yielding to the rot that is creeping into everything we do.
one of my favorite posts on the board. it's important to remember that many slaves were a certain personality type in search of an adventure!
You're really doubling down on the whole being offended thing. You might want to think about taking a walk or something.
Not every slave was stripped of their dignity
I remember how well Samuel L. Jackson's character, Stephen, was treated by Calvin Candie. Then, Django got all woke by King Schultz, and ruined it for everyone.one of my favorite posts on the board. it's important to remember that many slaves were a certain personality type in search of an adventure!
Odd that it's framed as an either/or proposition.I wouldn't bet the over on the number of inspirational stories relative to those who were stripped of their dignity.
Hm. A lot of stuff I thought I knew in grammar school was changed as I grew and learned. Studying US history in the run-up to the Civil War should have enlightened you about slavery if you weren’t enlightened already.In my southern Indiana grammar schooling, the horror that was slavery was "softened" to a great extent. It was likened to indentured servitude, and many slaveholders were said to be benevolent in their own best interest -- happy, well treated slaves were better producers.
Bootstraps man, bootstraps.Odd that it's framed as an either/or proposition.
No I understand. I lived in South Carolina for five years. The stories there too are numerous, but as you know they are overwhelmed by the weight of the tragedy - and the consequences have lingered. The issue is how to best try to level the playing field by elevating one group without punishing another. Laws. Of course. But that doesn’t address being hundreds of years late to the economic party.Have you seen Harriet? Not every slave was stripped of their dignity. Her story is an inspiration. Same for Hidden Figures, set 100 years later, towards the end of the Jim Crow era, with many of the same issues.
Is there anywhere you haven't lived? You must be as old as Noodle.No I understand. I lived in South Carolina for five years. The stories there too are numerous, but as you know they are overwhelmed by the weight of the tragedy - and the consequences have lingered. The issue is how to best try to level the playing field by elevating one group without punishing another. Laws. Of course. But that doesn’t address being hundreds of years late to the economic party.
Yeah and I ended back in Stl. That’s how dumb I amIs there anywhere you haven't lived? You must be as old as Noodle.
🤔
What kind of revisionist history is this? Enslavement, in and of itself, removes a person's dignity. Always. No exceptions.Have you seen Harriet? Not every slave was stripped of their dignity. Her story is an inspiration. Same for Hidden Figures, set 100 years later, towards the end of the Jim Crow era, with many of the same issues.
have you ever seen them in the same place? Remember when they were arguing with one another. Reminded my of Fight Club. Which one is Tyler Durden though?Is there anywhere you haven't lived? You must be as old as Noodle.
🤔
I wouldn't bet the over on the number of inspirational stories relative to those who were stripped of their dignity.
Messi will be out today. No Messi no Ronaldo past round of 16. Imo this marks the end of the greatest cycle. Makes me very sad. It’s been an amazing 15 yearshave you ever seen them in the same place? Remember when they were arguing with one another. Reminded my of Fight Club. Which one is Tyler Durden though?
While true, we'll also never know the innumerable horrors visited upon slaves for 200 years in the US. And not only b/c of the illiteracy of slaves but b/c of the whitewashing of history by our ancestors. I'm with McM on this one in that we need to begin to consider the economic situation in which blacks in America find themselves and work deliberately and intentionally to level that playing field. I don't have any answers for that but, given the time, would consider doing some reading on it. If anybody here can point me in the right direction I'd appreciate it.I wouldn’t either. On the other hand, we will never know many of those stories because of deliberate illiteracy forced on slaves. In some ways we have never gotten away from that illiteracy which is our unspoken and unspeakable fault.
People are not historically aware that slavery was bad? I have a hard time believing that.
Porto? Really....PORTO. How the mighty have fallen. As an aside, it's telling many of the world's greatest end up in Spain/France/Italy. Farm leagues.Messi will be out today. No Messi no Ronaldo past round of 16. Imo this marks the end of the greatest cycle. Makes me very sad. It’s been an amazing 15 years
What kind of revisionist history is this? Enslavement, in and of itself, removes a person's dignity. Always. No exceptions.
And, with respect to "Hidden Figures," did you actually see the movie? Of course the featured characters were inspirational but they were clearly stripped of their dignity, on a regular basis. That was, in fact, a central theme of the film.
With each post on this topic, you appear more ignorant.
For sure. Golden era for Portuguese players. The country is the population of North Carolina. CrazyPorto? Really....PORTO. How the mighty have fallen. As an aside, it's telling many of the world's greatest end up in Spain/France/Italy. Farm leagues.
Agree. The saddest of all is the belief we can fix any if this by addressing “systemic racism”. That is a lie we tell ourselves as we fool around with statues and name changes. The problem is obvious. So is the solution.No I understand. I lived in South Carolina for five years. The stories there too are numerous, but as you know they are overwhelmed by the weight of the tragedy - and the consequences have lingered. The issue is how to best try to level the playing field by elevating one group without punishing another. Laws. Of course. But that doesn’t address being hundreds of years late to the economic party.
While true, we'll also never know the innumerable horrors visited upon slaves for 200 years in the US. And not only b/c of the illiteracy of slaves but b/c of the whitewashing of history by our ancestors. I'm with McM on this one in that we need to begin to consider the economic situation in which blacks in America find themselves and work deliberately and intentionally to level that playing field. I don't have any answers for that but, given the time, would consider doing some reading on it. If anybody here can point me in the right direction I'd appreciate it.
Agree. The saddest of all is the belief we can fix any if this by addressing “systemic racism”. That is a lie we tell ourselves as we fool around with statues and name changes. The problem is obvious. So is the solution.
Who was the poster who came on here several months ago and tried to claim that, for the most part, slaves had it pretty good (fed, sheltered, free medical care, etc), and were pretty happy, as evidenced by their constant singing while working?