Sure. That’s easy to say, but that’s not what we are saying.
Saying he has never done it does not equal “what would Day's results as coach of IU or PU be this year? Day could not do what Cig did at IU, and maybe he would have sucked just as hard as Walters did”
I could similarly say cig couldn’t win at osu because he hasn’t done it if we are changing the conversation here.
It doesn't work both ways
If you win without advantages, then you can win with the advantages (Cigs going to OSU example)
If you win with advantages, then it doesn't necessarily mean you can win without those advantages. (Day at IU example)