for Georgia, Tennessee, and Notre Dame. Not bad for a non-football state (dws). Now, if IU can only figure out how to keep a few of those guys at home.
I would challenge the non-football contention, maybe in the past , not today.for Georgia, Tennessee, and Notre Dame. Not bad for a non-football state (dws). Now, if IU can only figure out how to keep a few of those guys at home.
I would challenge the non-football contention, maybe in the past , not today.
Agreed, though our recent experiences with some of Indiana's top-rated kids ( Allen, Kenney, Latham) have not turned out as well as we would have liked. Indiana high school football continues to grow and improve and this will only help IU going forward.for Georgia, Tennessee, and Notre Dame. Not bad for a non-football state (dws). Now, if IU can only figure out how to keep a few of those guys at home.
Not from me either -provided his recent alleged transgression is not something that renders him ineligible or results in his dismissal. If he is dismissed, then it's fair to say all three recruits failed to benefit IU in a meaningful way.Latham has lived up to his billing on the field. He is an All B10 level player, no complaint there.
You get them by winning for several seasons with multiple bowls and top 25 appearances.for Georgia, Tennessee, and Notre Dame. Not bad for a non-football state (dws). Now, if IU can only figure out how to keep a few of those guys at home.
You think he'll flip?