Pitino "we have been offensively challenged all year"
- Thread starter bsmitty08
- Start date
Just say what you really mean
IU has TC and Duke has the best coach to ever walk the sidelines. Why beat around the bush whining about TC all the time? We know how you feel. You have beat the dead horse until nothing is left but bones. Try something else for a while.
IU has TC and Duke has the best coach to ever walk the sidelines. Why beat around the bush whining about TC all the time? We know how you feel. You have beat the dead horse until nothing is left but bones. Try something else for a while.
Why don't you quit reading things into what he says?
he doesn't think CTC is a good coach, we all know it and he might state that opinion too often BUT in this case he was talking about Duke being a number 2 seed. I didn't see any mention of IU or CTC in his post. What he said has nothing to do with CTC and whether you think it does is irrelevant.
To quote you "We know how you feel. You have beat the dead horse until nothing is left but bones. Try something else for a while.". One side of the argument has no more moral high ground than the other.
he doesn't think CTC is a good coach, we all know it and he might state that opinion too often BUT in this case he was talking about Duke being a number 2 seed. I didn't see any mention of IU or CTC in his post. What he said has nothing to do with CTC and whether you think it does is irrelevant.
To quote you "We know how you feel. You have beat the dead horse until nothing is left but bones. Try something else for a while.". One side of the argument has no more moral high ground than the other.
Re: Why don't you quit reading things into what he says?
I don't fully agree with your last line,..."One side of the argument has no more moral high ground than the other."
One side of the argument includes people who are all in as fans of IU. It seems to me the other side are "conditional" fans based on who the coach is or isn't.
I don't fully agree with your last line,..."One side of the argument has no more moral high ground than the other."
One side of the argument includes people who are all in as fans of IU. It seems to me the other side are "conditional" fans based on who the coach is or isn't.
Re: Why don't you quit reading things into what he says?
You should know all about being irrelevant.
You should know all about being irrelevant.
Re: Why don't you quit reading things into what he says?
I am an IU fan. I want success at IU. People from this state know good basketball and we haven't seen much good basketball in the 7 years crean had been here. I think IU deserves more than what that have received u set him.
I am an IU fan. I want success at IU. People from this state know good basketball and we haven't seen much good basketball in the 7 years crean had been here. I think IU deserves more than what that have received u set him.
Re: It's ok.
he doesn't think CTC is a good coach, we all know it and he might state that opinion too often BUT in this case he was talking about Duke being a number 2 seed. I didn't see any mention of IU or CTC in his post. What he said has nothing to do with CTC and whether you think it does is irrelevant.
Well in third grade a teacher would ask you an actual question. And just who called out who first here Mr. Irrelevant? So in your post you called me out and then say I never answered your question. Well genius show me in this post where a question was asked for me to answer.
he doesn't think CTC is a good coach, we all know it and he might state that opinion too often BUT in this case he was talking about Duke being a number 2 seed. I didn't see any mention of IU or CTC in his post. What he said has nothing to do with CTC and whether you think it does is irrelevant.
Well in third grade a teacher would ask you an actual question. And just who called out who first here Mr. Irrelevant? So in your post you called me out and then say I never answered your question. Well genius show me in this post where a question was asked for me to answer.
Similar threads
