Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
. These guys are just lying their ass off about Russia at every single opportunity because they are innocent, right?There’s an awful lot of people that think the same and an awful lot of circumstantial evidence that points to the conclusion. And it’s not the least bit wacky.
Describe the “awful lot of circumstantial evidence”.
An awful lot of people think GWB took down the towers and they cite circumstantial evidence too.
Care to tell us who shot JFK?
Next up Bigfoot.
And there you go normalizing this man. Honestly, does it not even give you pause that nearly every Republican who is out of office, appointed or elected, every past president, regardless of their party, speaks out against this absurd joke of a man. Doesn’t it just make you think that maybe you are the one being conned, not these stalwarts if the GOP for the last decades? So afraid to admit you’ve been played. The emperor has no clothes.Joe, tell me about the good fight I'm fighting. What do you know about it?
Ouch, nice dig. But i've been on the losing side before and feel your pain. Wait, no I don't because I don't let this crap effect me. Give it time and it will all go your way, ... for a while, and then you will soil yourself again.
. These guys are just lying their ass off about Russia at every single opportunity because they are innocent, right?
Try reading a book called Russian Roulette. It’s funny you’re trying to compare to nonsensical conspiracy theories. It makes you look a little less than intelligent, kind of like when you pretend to know more than all the intelligence people that stood up for Brennan. I’ll get back with you when Mueller has those loose ends tied together. We’ll see who is laughing then.
Your best argument in defense of Trump publicly calling for Russia to release Hillary Clinton's emails is that it was a joke?For Brennan to take the Russian 30,000 email remark for anything other than the joke it was is clowning to the core.
Trump's incitement of Russia to release the emails is about as genuine as The Accountant's "joke" about The University of Chicago being the place where fun goes to die.Pay attention zeke. I asked you about treason. You need to put up the “awful lot of circumstantial evidence” you claim exists.
Former CIA Director Brennan going on national TV and mentioning Trump and Treason in the same sentence is in big foot tinfoil hat territory. For Brennan to take the Russian 30,000 email remark for anything other than the joke it was is clowning to the core. I really don’t care what the handful of former colleagues say about him. Brennan is unmistakably on the record as a dufus.
Ya wanna talk about Brennan’s lying to Congress too?
Your best argument in defense of Trump publicly calling for Russia to release Hillary Clinton's emails is that it was a joke?
Get the hell out of here.
Lol.
First I don’t defend it.
Second, it’s not an argument. It’s an observation.
Third, it was a frickin’ joke
We know better than that.
That's an obvious and cynical - even for you, CO - dodge.What exactly do you think you know about that if it wasn’t a joke? She put those emails on an unsecured server in her basement and Comey already told all of us that foreign powers hacked her personal server. If it was not a joke what’s the big deal?
Your head has exploded.
Trump expressly and publicly called on the Russians to release those emails in order to affect the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. And the Russians complied.
Lol. You need a lesson in email nuance. The 30000 emails have never been released. You are thinking of totally different emails. Lol.
Your head has exploded.
My inattention to the details of your post is on me.
The inarguable fact - which you haven't denied, and apparently admit - that the Russians hacked Clinton emails in response to Trump's public request to do so remains: https://slate.com/news-and-politics...-same-day-trump-asked-russia-to-hack-her.html
I suggest that you buy some Vaseline . . . my guess is that you're gonna need it.
So that is your comeback when I was obviously congratulating him for him success? (assuming only, of course that its a him, no disrespect intended to it). Either way, I am happy for anyone who puts in the work to find their own success. (do I have to actually put in different skin colors instead of "anyone" to stop your next statement of how racist I am ? )
No I don’t admit that and it is not a fact. Comey said in July of 2016 that foreign powers had hacked Clinton’s personal server. Trump made his joke months later.
"You didn't build that" was just a joke did you not get it. "Guns and religion" was a knee slapper. "You can keep your insurance" was a lift from Groucho. Why did you not find those jokes funny.No I don’t admit that and it is not a fact. Comey said in July of 2016 that foreign powers had hacked Clinton’s personal server. Trump made his joke months later.
Maybe I should keep a lid on all criticism of President Trump. I can’t afford to have my clearance revoked.And there may be more coming ... The WashPost's Karen DeYoung and Josh Dawsey report: "The White House has drafted documents revoking the security clearances of current and former officials whom President Trump has demanded be punished for criticizing him or playing a role in the [Russia] investigation."
- "Trump wants to sign 'most if not all'of them, said one senior White House official."
- "[C]ommunications aides ... have discussed the optimum times to release them as a distraction during unfavorable news cycles."
Dear lord.
Translation: What about Hillary, Strzok and Comey? Let's speculate about they might have done to deflect from discussing what Trump is actually doing.Here's a big if question. IF Mueller found that Brennan worked with Hillary, Strzork, Comey, ... (et all) to be a Domestic Enemy to our elections, would the country be better off knowing this, or not knowing this?
Fox had Gen. Tata on the other day in full uniform criticizing Brennan (surprise surprise) and I wondered at the time if he was entitled to wear his uniform to express political opinions instead of, say, giving a prayer or awarding a medal at a ceremonial function, since he retired in 2009. Surely he was monetizing his position as a uniformed general just as Trump accused Brennan of doing.And no Fox News Analyst has ever reached that level?
You posted: "I don’t think he disclosed secrets on air."I don’t think he disclosed secrets on air. I’m not sure how much access he has classified data. I am saying he has unprecedented access to important government players and provides background and otherwise anonymous sourced material to his colleagues. He obviously has a hard-on for Trump and he uses his government trade craft to further his political views. He has monetized his public service.
I don't care if he is like Hitler, Musolini, Pol Pot, Idi Amin or Boss Hogg.That's if the democratic process is maintained and respected. If you'll notice, the complaints about Trump and his reliance on Russian interference go directly to the heart of this exact question.
BTW, Trump isn't Hitler-esque . . . he's more Mussolini-ish to Putin's Hitler-esque. He's no better than second in the current Russian authoritarian pantheon - and may be a lot further down the ladder than that.
What? That is 100 percent inappropriate. I've never heard of him so I looked him up. You're right that he's been retired since 2009 so it's OK for him to comment on politics or be in politics, but wearing his uniform is not only inappropriate when he's doing that, it's clownish. I'd wear my uniform if requested for a military wedding or funeral, or for a military ball (which I've avoided since I've retired so far), but otherwise it stays in the closet.Fox had Gen. Tata on the other day in full uniform criticizing Brennan (surprise surprise) and I wondered at the time if he was entitled to wear his uniform to express political opinions instead of, say, giving a prayer or awarding a medal at a ceremonial function, since he retired in 2009. Surely he was monetizing his position as a uniformed general just as Trump accused Brennan of doing.
Par for the course for FoxWhat? That is 100 percent inappropriate. I've never heard of him so I looked him up. You're right that he's been retired since 2009 so it's OK for him to comment on politics or be in politics, but wearing his uniform is not only inappropriate when he's doing that, it's clownish. I'd wear my uniform if requested for a military wedding or funeral, or for a military ball (which I've avoided since I've retired so far), but otherwise it stays in the closet.
Maybe I should keep a lid on all criticism of President Trump. I can’t afford to have my clearance revoked.
Ouch, nice dig. But i've been on the losing side before and feel your pain. Wait, no I don't because I don't let this crap effect me. Give it time and it will all go your way, ... for a while, and then you will soil yourself again.
It's nice that you're trying to be polite, but let's not forget this little back-and-forth all goes back to this comment:It wasn't a dig. It was a question. You're so desperate to win some kind of battle somewhere that you have to go to the internet pounding your chest to feel better. I'm not looking for winning and losing here, so it's much simpler with me for you to just say you don't know what you're talking about.
ISIS didn't get a total foot hold in the US from the last admin due to term limits.
It's nice that you're trying to be polite, but let's not forget this little back-and-forth all goes back to this comment:
Joe should consider himself lucky if the worst he gets is a polite remonstrance.
This brought back memories of George Jessel who often appeared in full uniform; he had appeared in USO shows but had not served in any branch of the military:What? That is 100 percent inappropriate. I've never heard of him so I looked him up. You're right that he's been retired since 2009 so it's OK for him to comment on politics or be in politics, but wearing his uniform is not only inappropriate when he's doing that, it's clownish. I'd wear my uniform if requested for a military wedding or funeral, or for a military ball (which I've avoided since I've retired so far), but otherwise it stays in the closet.
It appears Joe, and others, who believe we have defeated ISIS are wrong.
Joe should consider himself lucky
It was an unprecedented, cowardly, third-world, pathetic act. In my opinion, and I say this with total sincerity (because I understand security clearances and what they mean for the country and the person), it is an impeachable move.
Another one???It was an unprecedented, cowardly, third-world, pathetic act. In my opinion, and I say this with total sincerity (because I understand security clearances and what they mean for the country and the person), it is an impeachable move.
I know I ragged on you a bit in another thread, but I saw Tata wearing his uniform when he was blasting Brennan on Fox. I am admittedly a civilian but it sure looked like a general's uniform to me (several stars on his collar).What? That is 100 percent inappropriate. I've never heard of him so I looked him up. You're right that he's been retired since 2009 so it's OK for him to comment on politics or be in politics, but wearing his uniform is not only inappropriate when he's doing that, it's clownish. I'd wear my uniform if requested for a military wedding or funeral, or for a military ball (which I've avoided since I've retired so far), but otherwise it stays in the closet.
Sometimes it's difficult to interpret when clowns wear serious-looking uniforms.This brought back memories of George Jessel who often appeared in full uniform; he had appeared in USO shows but had not served in any branch of the military: