We've played terribly against them the last three or four games.I watched Ball State making some nice plays at times up there yesterday.
No one is confusing them with National Championship contenders but they're the type of team that can beat you (even when they shouldn't) if you don't take them seriously and aren't at the top of your game...
expect it to come down.
The last time we played them, two years ago, we won by 10 and were up 30-0 at halftime. What happened in 2008 and 2011 is meaningless. Entirely different teams.We've played terribly against them the last three or four games.
This board overvalues every team we ever play.expect it to come down.
I watched the ND game yesterday and honestly, ND looked shitty. Ball State certainly played hardnosed and hung around, but ND looked cruddy.
Indiana just pushed around a 3-4 defense in Virginia. Having just rewatched the game, Indiana's oline crushed the Cavaliers' front line. Ball State will be amped, but I'm sure Debord plans to wear them down with our big offensive line coupled with hammering them with a 6-2, 240lb manchild.
Beat the piss out of Muncie!!
Wow...I watched the ND game yesterday and honestly, ND looked shitty. Ball State certainly played hardnosed and hung around, but ND looked cruddy.
Indiana just pushed around a 3-4 defense in Virginia. Having just rewatched the game, Indiana's oline crushed the Cavaliers' front line. Ball State will be amped, but I'm sure Debord plans to wear them down with our big offensive line coupled with hammering them with a 6-2, 240lb manchild.
Beat the piss out of Muncie!!
Ball State's football players will hear all week about how close they came against Notre Dame.
IU will crush them. Take the over.
I'm not sure that we know what kind of team we have yet. FIU was probably a better gauge than the Noah Bowl, and from that game my sense is that we have the makings of a pretty good IU football team . . . but it feels like we're coached to do just enough to beat the other team by playing just above the other team's level.expect it to come down.
I'm not sure that we know what kind of team we have yet. FIU was probably a better gauge than the Noah Bowl, and from that game my sense is that we have the makings of a pretty good IU football team . . . but it feels like we're coached to do just enough to beat the other team by playing just above the other team's level.
I wasn't impressed by UVA. Might be that Bronco Mendenhall's pronouncement that UVA has only 27 ACC caliber players on this year's team swayed me a good bit . . . for example, UVA had a surprising passing game - when it showed up it was surprising, and when it showed up it surprisingly had IU's defense on its heels a good bit.
Their run offense consisted pretty much of their QB finding a hole to run to and then through . . . he was a bit of a handful until we verified our conclusion that the UVA passing game was at best a surprise when it worked. Their RBs would have fit square in the middle of IU's stable . . . .
Defensively, it seemed to me that they sold out to stop Ramsey in the belief that IU didn't have an RB that could beat them. Well . . . the biggest problem I had with IU's game all night was the insistence on calling something other than Stevie Scott into the gut of UVA's defense. I guess I'm too Pavlovian . . . but if the other guys haven't stopped a running play in umpteen attempts, why not stick with it? Which tells me the OL was pretty good Saturday night . . . .
Other than that I don't think the Noah Bowl tells us much. And the FIU game might.
Ball State will tell us more about ourselves . . . the MSU game will tell us more about the BiG and our place in it.
Yeah, I noticed that too, against UVA anyway; to me he looked like he was shot-putting the ball.I I now the conditions stunk but Ramsey just has a weird passing motion. Looks like he pushes the ball more than throws it.
Yeah, I didn't quite get that line of thinking either. I'm not sure which of those guys would have been the better QB prospect . . . I wouldn't have minded either of those switching to RB to see what they could make of themselves there.It’s interesting to note that the announcers for the IU - Virginia game said that “IU had recruited” the Virginia QB and that “he was wanting to show that IU made the wrong choice.” Not sure whether that meant he wanted to come here and we pursued Dawkins instead? Found that a bit odd.
I watched Ball State making some nice plays at times up there yesterday.
No one is confusing them with National Championship contenders but they're the type of team that can beat you (even when they shouldn't) if you don't take them seriously and aren't at the top of your game...
Pretty sure that's the mentality that pu took into their game against E MI.
Think of the Ball State game as the Bucket Game Light... That's how they're approaching it (without the Light part)...
I don't want to downplay what BSU did Saturday at all but I think ND was not very good either. Trap game for them for sure.Really surprised at how dismissive some posters are of Ball State. They just played in an extremely hostile environment against the #8 team in the country and gave them all they could handle. And it was no fluke. Ball State controlled the clock, they ran 97 plays to ND's 72, and they totally disrupted ND's QB Wimbush with sacks and picks.
After that experience, do you think they're intimated by us? Neither do I. I'm with 76-1. If we don't play very well, we will lose to this team.
Well, I saw them play their second game last year, when they still had Neal, and they were horrible, so I was ultra confident of IU winning this game. However, the combination of BSU playing up at ND, and us fiddle-farting around and almost losing a home game against an inferior opponent who we physically dominated definitely has me concerned. I'm coming over to the dark side now. Over the years we've had such a difficult time sustaining our play against inferior but competent teams. That was the one aspect of the FIU game that was so satisfying......then it's back to "hold on" in the Virginia game.
The way I see it there are 3 possibilities: 1. We go out and take care of business right from the start, keep our foot on the gas, and walk away with a solid 14 point win. This seems like the least likely outcome. 2. We overlook BSU and they jump to a 10 point HT lead. We come back and it's a one possession game one way or the other at the end; or 3. We show up ready to play. have a 10 point half-time lead, then don't show up out of the locker room and have to try to hold on at the end, eg. Virginia.
I don't want to downplay what BSU did Saturday at all but I think ND was not very good either. Trap game for them for sure.
My view is you have to respect any team that goes into South Bend and gives the Top 10 Irish a run for their money.Ball State is good and we will have to play well to win. I highly doubt Tom Allen would allow anyone to over look any team. That being said ND didn't look good in that game. I have had so many ND fans today tell me that Ball State is very good. Now I believe they are. But it just seems that ND fans are bending over backwards to make themselves or their team look better by saying this. I saw the game and didn't think either team played well.
The last time we played them, two years ago, we won by 10 and were up 30-0 at halftime. What happened in 2008 and 2011 is meaningless. Entirely different teams.
My view is you have to respect any team that goes into South Bend and gives the Top 10 Irish a run for their money.
This game will not be a blowout.And this Ball State team is quite a bit better than that 2016 team...
This game will not be a blowout.