Why is it that only 3 teams in the BIG (IU, Nebraska and Northwestern) have to open the season with a BIG opponent? All the rest get a non-conference opener. Michigan gets two.
I don't know how those decisions are made, but I welcome a season opener against a conference opponent in MS. We get more interest and eyeballs out of the gate, and we immediately have a pretty good idea as to what kind of a team we've got.Why is it that only 3 teams in the BIG (IU, Nebraska and Northwestern) have to open the season with a BIG opponent? All the rest get a non-conference opener. Michigan gets two.
Purdue plays Penn State on Thursday.Why is it that only 3 teams in the BIG (IU, Nebraska and Northwestern) have to open the season with a BIG opponent? All the rest get a non-conference opener. Michigan gets two.
Why is it that only 3 teams in the BIG (IU, Nebraska and Northwestern) have to open the season with a BIG opponent? All the rest get a non-conference opener. Michigan gets two.
Yep, I missed that one. Just seems that it some teams at a disadvantage against other BIG teams in trying to get a championship.Purdue plays Penn State on Thursday.
Kraft needs to be our AD, you are spot on.I’m frankly shocked that this didn’t happen to IU.
Also, their AD is who should be home, at IU.
https://nittanylionswire.usatoday.c...rated-over-abundance-of-big-ten-road-openers/
Should be everyone or no one.Well, for the TV package they want to have some B1G games in the first few weeks. So well, somebody has to play them, right?
Exactly.Should be everyone or no one.