More Censorship
- Thread starter stollcpa
- Start date
You can be wrong far more economically than this...geez. And fyi Hoops, Bilk, Stiffshit, & others that can’t read a dictionary, economically can be used in contexts other than money...
Thank you. I kept thinking it was on Walnut, but now I realize I was thinking of Caveat Emptor.
My book buying binge was essentially the 90s. I got to know Joie then, and we've remain good friends ever since. By the end of the decade I'd gotten into home computing and the Internet and that all fell by the wayside.
So, I think I was very cordial in posts with you in this thread. We just disagreed, slightly, and most of my posts to you were phrased as respectful questions. And yet, you refer to me as "Bilk", and imply that I can't read? I can only assume that's the level of discourse you want?
It's amazing how much braver the conservatives got after losing a Presidential election.
In my attempts to reason it quickly became apparent that with some of you it’s just not possible. Its one thing when people have disagreements in matters of opinion, but when people refuse to accept that a word means what is stated in every dictionary because of their politics, there is no honest discussion to be had. In addition to this, in the posts prior to this you used the words dumbass, butthurt, & suggested someone can only read well enough to consume Dr. Seuss books because they disagreed with you. It’s only a matter of time before you revert to those tactics with me. You have months of being a douche to me & everyone who thinks differently than you, yet you make a couple of civil posts & suddenly don’t understand why you get no respect.🙄. Prove me wrong...
1. Check my posting history, your statement is bs.
2. The only Republican I voted for was Holcomb, my guys won the election, your statement is bs.
It seems your willing to post pointless, inaccurate lies , & you think it makes me look bad?😂😂😂
I was reading further and he did offer to sell these wedding cakes, but they refused.
Fair enough.
I do apologize for one thing...giving the impression that I was seeking your respect. I was just asking for your motivation, and you have made it clear. I will view all your subsequent posts, to everyone you disagree with, through a more informed set of lenses.
Carry on.
Last edited:
Yes. All this shit about censorship is f*****g stupid. And, of course, it’s all from the cons. The party bitching about cancel culture while simultaneously doing everything they can to cancel people’s ability to vote.exactly my pointGlad you are following along
It's delusional how they want to call dems being hypocrites when all they really need is a good mirror to find hypocrites.
Howard's was 1 space east of where Uptown is.
Book Nook was at one time in the space on Indiana Av that became The Gables, and that space was The Book Nook when Hoagy used the piano there to write Stardust.
believe it maybe was though across from the Von Lee at some point.
Caveat Emptor made it's way to Walnut at some time, but was originally, (or at one time pre Walnut anyway), on Indiana Ave, just north of The Gables/Garcia's Pizza space, and a few doors up from Karma. (don't really recall it as a "bookstore" per se though).
And, it's coming from the party that cancels any Republican that dares to criticize Trump or even just gives him something less than 100% unbridled support.
Ridiculous. You refer to concerns over the chipping away at the childhood common culture and digital self censorship as “stupid”.
While embracing radical HR-1 legislation that would undermine all remaining confidence in our election process if passed.
You’re a fool, but from you’re posting history you’ll likely never admit to as much.
Last edited:
When you go home and think about this tonight, you should take comfort in all the reasons the Republicans have given us to think that the 2020 election was more secure and credible than any election in memory.
Just think about it -- more than 60 lawsuits were filed all around the country to challenge numerous aspects of the election, using a wide varety of legal theories, many of them unusual and never previously attempted. What previous election has been tested in court so many times and in so many places?
These lawsuits were championed by Donald Trump, who tells us he is one of the world's foremost strategists. He was assisted by a powerhouse team of lawyers, including Rudy Giuliani, Lin Wood and Sydney Powell. What previous election challenges were conducted by such legal talent?
The challengers were supported by virtually unlimited funds for legal fees, including Trump's own, limitless (though undocumented) personal fortune and several fine-printed PAC's that gave him control over hundreds of millions of dollars to spend on election challenges. What previous election challenges were so well funded?
And, the drumbeat of claims of "election fraud" were so loud that they began echoing about two months before the election. No potential witness to later "election fraud" could ever have been unaware that his/her sworn testimony was going to be needed to resolve any possible uncertainties whatsoever about our election. Surely, all those Republican election witnesses knew they needed to keep their eyes open and, doubtless, they were watchful.
Yet, despite all these advantages, the Republicans thankfully failed to prove even one, single instance of "election fraud" anywhere in the whole country. All their lawsuits were thrown out of court for lack of evidence.
I am eminently thankful that the Republicans proved the 2020 election was credible, given their diligence and extensive review of the facts.
Similar threads
