ADVERTISEMENT

Mark Cuban weighs in on Hannity

Abrams needs more experience. She was the minority leader of a state legislature. Pete is more qualified than she is.

Stacey Could well be qualified, but the perception that she isn't is front and center. I just think overall choosing her could be a negative distraction that Biden just doesn't need...
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
Some categories: smart enough, cares for people, generally honest, young enough to likely survive four years. Trump fails all four. Biden fails one by my count.
 
Stacey Could well be qualified, but the perception that she isn't is front and center. I just think overall choosing her could be a negative distraction that Biden just doesn't need...

The biggest negative with Abrams is that she is morbidly obese. Not a good pairing with a 77 year old prez candidate.
 
I would not be surprised if Biden picked Val Demings as his running mate; she's black, a former police chief, a family woman, photogenic and about as close to the center a candidate as I can think of that the Dem's have to offer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Val_Demings

I personally find her boring and she doesn't the same degree of intellectual rigour as Kamala. Disclaimer that I'm big on the Biden-Kamala ticket and have since day one.

The main negative I see is that I prefer a midwest candidate as California is a gimme.
 
I personally find her boring and she doesn't the same degree of intellectual rigour as Kamala. Disclaimer that I'm big on the Biden-Kamala ticket and have since day one.

The main negative I see is that I prefer a midwest candidate as California is a gimme.
And Mike Pence isn't?
 
I would not be surprised if Biden picked Val Demings as his running mate; she's black, a former police chief, a family woman, photogenic and about as close to the center a candidate as I can think of that the Dem's have to offer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Val_Demings
I have nothing against Rep. Demings, but I hope not. She's what I would call "2nd Tier". She made a name for herself during the impeachment hearings, but otherwise...

Biden needs to go safe and go strong. Harris or Klobachar are the only ones who fit the bill, IMO. Amy is my personal preference, but Harris is probably better politically.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcmurtry66
It’s amusing how concerned so many are with Biden’s VP pick. No one ever cares who the VP is and it definitely never factors into voting preference.

So many Trump voters don’t like Trump but couldn’t vote for Clinton. They still don’t like Trump but can’t vote for a socialist in 2020. They still don’t like Trump but they can’t vote for a moderate like Biden because his VP pick might be a socialist. It’s comical. Guess what? They are voting for Trump.
 
It’s amusing how concerned so many are with Biden’s VP pick. No one ever cares who the VP is and it definitely never factors into voting preference.

So many Trump voters don’t like Trump but couldn’t vote for Clinton. They still don’t like Trump but can’t vote for a socialist in 2020. They still don’t like Trump but they can’t vote for a moderate like Biden because his VP pick might be a socialist. It’s comical. Guess what? They are voting for Trump.
Uh, nobody voted for, or supports T.rump.
Oh, and it's the Dems fault that he was nominated and won.
:confused:
 
So many Trump voters don’t like Trump but couldn’t vote for Clinton. They still don’t like Trump but can’t vote for a socialist in 2020. They still don’t like Trump but they can’t vote for a moderate like Biden because his VP pick might be a socialist. It’s comical. Guess what? They are voting for Trump.[/QUOTE]
this isn’t fair. No one cares about the vice when the prez is healthy. If the prez’s health is in question than the vp pick is more impt. If you don’t want a socialist and the vp is a socialist it’s an issue.
 
So many Trump voters don’t like Trump but couldn’t vote for Clinton. They still don’t like Trump but can’t vote for a socialist in 2020. They still don’t like Trump but they can’t vote for a moderate like Biden because his VP pick might be a socialist. It’s comical. Guess what? They are voting for Trump.
this isn’t fair. No one cares about the vice when the prez is healthy. If the prez’s health is in question than the vp pick is more impt. If you don’t want a socialist and the vp is a socialist it’s an issue.[/QUOTE]

I disagree. Voters like Stoll, who are fearful of a socialist VP pick, are Trump voters. Besides, why aren’t they fearful of Trumps health? He’s begging to get the virus. Something happens to him and you get Pence. Pence got out of dodge in Indiana because he was going to lose the governors race as an incumbent Republican. In Indiana. That’s basically impossible to pull off.
 
Republican candidates pick VPs who nobody would want and too often it doesn’t matter. And way too often they are former Indiana governors! Wtf’s wrong with you people?
 
I have nothing against Rep. Demings, but I hope not. She's what I would call "2nd Tier". She made a name for herself during the impeachment hearings, but otherwise...

Biden needs to go safe and go strong. Harris or Klobachar are the only ones who fit the bill, IMO. Amy is my personal preference, but Harris is probably better politically.


Said it would be Harris when this was first discussed, and sticking by that prediction. Will be shocked if it's anyone else.
 
The VP spot will go to someone who is perceived to have the most pull in a handful of swing states. Having said this historically I look back at the VP picks and say “Huh?”
 
Up until the pandemic I would have voted for trump. After I won't. Assuming Biden's faculties are fine I'd be fine okay with biden (though i hate career politicians), much like i was fine with obama as i trust it'll be much like obama 2.0.

seems like the media did their job, interesting
 
ADVERTISEMENT