Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
After is one thing and landing them is something else.No.
We're on much, much better players. Believe it or not, were actually after players outside of Indiana as well. In this article, it was asked about what prospects were in on.
https://basketballrecruiting.rivals...leftovers-hunter-sallis-pitt-maryland-indiana
IU needs athletes not shooters!
Went up to Hartford City to watch Luke Brown play Friday night. He is not skinny. He obviously has spent some time in the weight room. Has developed good muscular definition. He was, definitely, the quickest kid on the floor. His shooting stroke is superb. Looks like he has been to the Rick Mount shooting school. He is hitting 42% of his three point shots this year, and most of these come from beyond 25 feet. Makes free throws. He is the best passer I have seen in high school ball in a long time. He had 11 assists and would have had 20 if his teammates had been better shooters. He is averaging over 8 assists a game. Hustled on defense. Has a good handle. Evaluation is difficult because he was playing against a 1A school. I would not be disappointed if IU offered him. Think he is a better shooter than Alford was and is a little quicker.
Went up to Hartford City to watch Luke Brown play Friday night. He is not skinny. He obviously has spent some time in the weight room. Has developed good muscular definition. He was, definitely, the quickest kid on the floor. His shooting stroke is superb. Looks like he has been to the Rick Mount shooting school. He is hitting 42% of his three point shots this year, and most of these come from beyond 25 feet. Makes free throws. He is the best passer I have seen in high school ball in a long time. He had 11 assists and would have had 20 if his teammates had been better shooters. He is averaging over 8 assists a game. Hustled on defense. Has a good handle. Evaluation is difficult because he was playing against a 1A school. I would not be disappointed if IU offered him. Think he is a better shooter than Alford was and is a little quicker.
Well the Alford comparison should keep fan expectations reasonable.
Just confirming, based upon your physical evaluation of brown, in 12 months (given he was held back a year) he will be the same age as Alford ending his Freshman year at IU? A freshman year highlighted by an upset win of the 1984 #1 UNC team. I would recommend reviewing video of that game and the nature of how Alford scored (flashed more athleticism/quickness than usually given credit for — not a great athlete by any means — but better than likely remembered). That was on display against some of the best athletes in America.
Alford shot 59% from the field as a freshman at IU. 18/19 years old.
53% from both 2 & 3 for his career.
Yet you compared LB’s 42% from 3 against the lowest level of Indiana high school basketball and concluded him to be/project to be a better shooter than Alford? LB may be quicker, but isn’t close to demonstrating that on any platform that mattered at the same age Big Ten, NCAA, Olympics as Alford did in 1984.
I’m the furthest thing from an Alford fan from a coaching perspective, but I find his playing record at IU pretty much unimpeachable. I’m much less familiar with his high school record, but my guess it was very impressive.
I think it is a major disservice to Luke Brown that Alford’s name was even mentioned in your post. Your very minor disclaimer about the competition rings hollow in the shadow of that comparison.
That said, I appreciate the time you spent observing and posting the report on Luke as a player (that is the value of this board).
There’s not a player on IUs team That could beat Brown in a game of horse or free throw shooting!Well in fairness, you're comparing Brown's #s as a senior in HS to Alfords college #s. I agree with you, especially my recollection of Alford in high school, he scored from all over, not just from range. That may be what the guy was trying to say: that Brown is a better shooter from 3 in high school. Still you're talking about the difference between 2 premier shooters. The worst think he could have done was compared him to SA.. too many strong emotions with him. Would have been better to say Coverdale or Lewis. The bottom line is, the kid does appear to be a terrific shooter, albeit against weaker comp. Intriguing prospect to possibly round out a class, and another in the long line of great IN HS players.
Which is probably true.. In the same manner, I doubt Brown could get a shot off in game against them.There’s not a player on IUs team That could beat Brown in a game of horse or free throw shooting!
There’s not a player on IUs team That could beat Brown in a game of horse or free throw shooting!
Absolutely take the skilled basketball player over the raw athlete who can not dribble, pass, or shoot.We need ball players first and foremost!
Just a couple of things to consider. I haven't seen Brown play so I'm not qualified to judge whether he's B1G material or not. But he is just a junior with another full year to mature physically and develop his game before he has to play at the collegiate level. As for age, check SA's date of birth. He started school later than his classmates as well. From folks who know the family, that was designed to help insure that he was as/more mature physically as those he would be competing against through hs. The same is true with a whole lot of other kids throughout the long history of basketball in this state. So much so that the IHSAA legislated against holding kids back a second year in middle school who were making sufficient academic progress.Well the Alford comparison should keep fan expectations reasonable.
Just confirming, based upon your physical evaluation of brown, in 12 months (given he was held back a year) he will be the same age as Alford ending his Freshman year at IU? A freshman year highlighted by an upset win of the 1984 #1 UNC team. I would recommend reviewing video of that game and the nature of how Alford scored (flashed more athleticism/quickness than usually given credit for — not a great athlete by any means — but better than likely remembered). That was on display against some of the best athletes in America.
Alford shot 59% from the field as a freshman at IU. 18/19 years old.
53% from both 2 & 3 for his career.
Yet you compared LB’s 42% from 3 against the lowest level of Indiana high school basketball and concluded him to be/project to be a better shooter than Alford? LB may be quicker, but isn’t close to demonstrating that on any platform that mattered at the same age Big Ten, NCAA, Olympics as Alford did in 1984.
I’m the furthest thing from an Alford fan from a coaching perspective, but I find his playing record at IU pretty much unimpeachable. I’m much less familiar with his high school record, but my guess it was very impressive.
I think it is a major disservice to Luke Brown that Alford’s name was even mentioned in your post. Your very minor disclaimer about the competition rings hollow in the shadow of that comparison.
That said, I appreciate the time you spent observing and posting the report on Luke as a player (that is the value of this board).
Go watch him play and tell us what you think.Well the Alford comparison should keep fan expectations reasonable.
Just confirming, based upon your physical evaluation of brown, in 12 months (given he was held back a year) he will be the same age as Alford ending his Freshman year at IU? A freshman year highlighted by an upset win of the 1984 #1 UNC team. I would recommend reviewing video of that game and the nature of how Alford scored (flashed more athleticism/quickness than usually given credit for — not a great athlete by any means — but better than likely remembered). That was on display against some of the best athletes in America.
Alford shot 59% from the field as a freshman at IU. 18/19 years old.
53% from both 2 & 3 for his career.
Yet you compared LB’s 42% from 3 against the lowest level of Indiana high school basketball and concluded him to be/project to be a better shooter than Alford? LB may be quicker, but isn’t close to demonstrating that on any platform that mattered at the same age Big Ten, NCAA, Olympics as Alford did in 1984.
I’m the furthest thing from an Alford fan from a coaching perspective, but I find his playing record at IU pretty much unimpeachable. I’m much less familiar with his high school record, but my guess it was very impressive.
I think it is a major disservice to Luke Brown that Alford’s name was even mentioned in your post. Your very minor disclaimer about the competition rings hollow in the shadow of that comparison.
That said, I appreciate the time you spent observing and posting the report on Luke as a player (that is the value of this board).
Did not see what you are referring to. Watching him hit threes and pull-up jumpers (going straight up) instantly reminded me of Rick Mount. Again, his passing was the biggest surprise for me and something no one is talking about. And to save someone the picky criticism, I know there was no three-point shot when Mount played.Luke shoots the ball a bit off to the side. This may make it harder to get off
I’d still offer him great shooter
yes the lower the iq the betterIU needs athletes not shooters!
haver you ever heard of setting a screen or is archie too much of a dumb@ss to use screens and moving without the ball ?Which is probably true.. In the same manner, I doubt Brown could get a shot off in game against them.
I said this a few weeks ago or so. Luke Brown is just fun to watch as a fan. If he is just a high school player and can't do it on the next level then I can still say that watching him play was a fine experience.Go watch him play and tell us what you think.
There’s not a player on IUs team That could beat Brown in a game of horse or free throw shooting!
Just a couple of things to consider. I haven't seen Brown play so I'm not qualified to judge whether he's B1G material or not. But he is just a junior with another full year to mature physically and develop his game before he has to play at the collegiate level. As for age, check SA's date of birth. He started school later than his classmates as well. From folks who know the family, that was designed to help insure that he was as/more mature physically as those he would be competing against through hs. The same is true with a whole lot of other kids throughout the long history of basketball in this state. So much so that the IHSAA legislated against holding kids back a second year in middle school who were making sufficient academic progress.
My guess is that many of the kids in his class competing against Luke Brown are as old as he is. If his family has a history of maturing late physically, good for them for thinking ahead. I was born in August and graduated from hs at 17. My freshman year in college I grew an inch and put on 40 pounds. I think about how that would have helped me as a high school player and I sure wish my parents had started me later. Point is, it's not giving Luke Brown some advantage that distorts his true potential.
For those who discount the level of competition, lots of great players have come from small schools. Larry Bird didn't play against the biggest and the best in high school for sure. It didn't seem to limit him at the next level.
The same is true of athletic ability. Special skills are still special skills. Remember a kid named Jay Burson ? Would you take him on your team ? As I said, I don't know if Brown can play or not but I would be cautious about automatically discounting him. I'm sure the staff will be diligent, but at this point I would take a hard look at somebody's grandma if she could shoot it.
Too true. I have an August Bday and like you graduated at 17. My senior year in HS: 5'10" and 140. By my freshman year in college: 6'3" and 185.
Does this mean next year Luke will be 6'7"? Lol Just kidding. It is true that some guys are late bloomers. Didn't David Robinson grow a lot while at Navy?Too true. I have an August Bday and like you graduated at 17. My senior year in HS: 5'10" and 140. By my freshman year in college: 6'3" and 185.
Does this mean next year Luke will be 6'7"? Lol Just kidding. It is true that some guys are late bloomers. Didn't David Robinson grow a lot while at Navy?
I actually forgot the point about David being too tall to really serve. If you can't be on ships or subs then what are you going to do in the Navy?yeah, I think at the time the tallest you could be admitted to the Navy was 6'6", so he grew 6-7". Think it's so they can pass through portals on ships/subs.
I actually forgot the point about David being too tall to really serve. If you can't be on ships or subs then what are you going to do in the Navy?
Retry: No Top 10 school is recruiting Brown. Nor is the whole of the BIG.haver you ever heard of setting a screen or is archie too much of a dumb@ss to use screens and moving without the ball ?
Just a couple of things to consider. I haven't seen Brown play so I'm not qualified to judge whether he's B1G material or not. But he is just a junior with another full year to mature physically and develop his game before he has to play at the collegiate level. As for age, check SA's date of birth. He started school later than his classmates as well. From folks who know the family, that was designed to help insure that he was as/more mature physically as those he would be competing against through hs. The same is true with a whole lot of other kids throughout the long history of basketball in this state. So much so that the IHSAA legislated against holding kids back a second year in middle school who were making sufficient academic progress.
My guess is that many of the kids in his class competing against Luke Brown are as old as he is. If his family has a history of maturing late physically, good for them for thinking ahead. I was born in August and graduated from hs at 17. My freshman year in college I grew an inch and put on 40 pounds. I think about how that would have helped me as a high school player and I sure wish my parents had started me later. Point is, it's not giving Luke Brown some advantage that distorts his true potential.
For those who discount the level of competition, lots of great players have come from small schools. Larry Bird didn't play against the biggest and the best in high school for sure. It didn't seem to limit him at the next level.
The same is true of athletic ability. Special skills are still special skills. Remember a kid named Jay Burson ? Would you take him on your team ? As I said, I don't know if Brown can play or not but I would be cautious about automatically discounting him. I'm sure the staff will be diligent, but at this point I would take a hard look at somebody's grandma if she could shoot it.
Go watch him play and tell us what you think.
As of note...the 3 point line wasn’t added until 1987 in the IHSAA. We will never know if Alford was a better 3 point shooter than Brown is.
That is exactly what I think he will be, it's up to Archie to surround an offensive talent like that with defenders and use the positives. Hulls couldn't guard a chair either, but he definitely could play.When Jordan Hulls signed with IU,50% of this board knocked his shooting form and said he would never get a shot off in college.
When IU was searching for a new coach,AM was brought up early and often as a great hire.I love internet message boards.
Give Luke Brown a preferred walk-on position like McRoberts. If he earns his scholarship then give it to him at that time. Still allows IU to sign 3 top 100 players for 2021, Furst, Lander, Kaufman, and maybe Wesley. Adds a pure shooter to the roster in 2021.
Furst and Kaufman should go to the same school because they would play well together. Kaufman has range and Furst is a down low to mid range guy. I could see them doing some real damage together.Luke Brown has mid major scholarship offers. The likelihood thay he would accept a walk on here isn't good at all.
And we're not gonna get a class full of all Indiana kids like you keep saying. Furst and Kaufman aren't gonna go to the same school.
Furst would end up his backup.Furst and Kaufman should go to the same school because they would play well together. Kaufman has range and Furst is a down low to mid range guy. I could see them doing some real damage together.
We also had a coach who couldn’t teach him to guard a chair.That is exactly what I think he will be, it's up to Archie to surround an offensive talent like that with defenders and use the positives. Hulls couldn't guard a chair either, but he definitely could play.