It's a Jan. 6 Prime time Special!
- Thread starter GuyDatHoo
- Start date
lmao! Biden would have spent a helluva lot more if Manchin hadn't save the country's ass.
Questioned the outcome. You know, like Trump did in 2020.
Free cheese and the war on fossil fuels."The US has been grappling with rising prices since last year, when an unexpectedly strong economic rebound from the shock of the pandemic - driven by large doses of US government spending, including direct cheques to households - overwhelmed supplies, prompting companies to raise prices.
Now the war in Ukraine has spread the problem around the world, with Covid related shutdowns in China this spring contributing."
It's well documented gov free cheese increased our inflation.
Energy and food drive US inflation to highest for 40 years
Rising energy and food costs pushed inflation to 8.6% in May, the highest rate in more than 40 years.www.bbc.com
Tell me again how the Vietnam war was 'raging' in 1974, genius.
I think some of the pandemic spending was actually warranted. Personally I was laid off in May of 2020 and the larger unemployment benefit was a god send in terms of helping me job hunt in a shitty employment market without having to worry about keeping a roof over my head. If all the money went to stuff like that I would be on board 100%. But Trump’s subsequent relief bill and Biden’s unnecessary boondoggle was so ill advised as to be reckless.
Yep. Spending spree. I used it all to get out of debt. I didn’t buy one damn thing with that money.
Trump started claiming months before the 2020 election that if he didn't win, the loss would be due only to election fraud.
Trump: ‘The only way we’re going to lose this election is if the election is rigged’
President Trump on Monday further cast doubt on the U.S. election process, claiming falsely that the only way he would lose in November is if the election is “rigged.”Trump made the remark at the e…
thehill.com
What a corrupt egotist.
The Proud Boys and at least one other similar group (the name escapes me for the moment) went to the Capitol to scope it out 2-3 hours before Trump told his rally to walk there with him.
Apparently, the Proud Boys pick a color of the day to wear so they can know their fellows. On Jan. 6, the color was orange, and many of the crowd shots of the insurrection show orange arm bands, orange hunting caps, orange hunting vests etc.
That DOJ website you posted weeks ago is showing a substantial number of these cases cycling through the mill.
What's the reasoning on that? Is there a practical reason, or are they just fashionistas?
They can be horrible and still have a little taste. Frankenstein wore a sport coat
Apparently, you don't like to watch Liz Cheney.
If you guys would just admit that Trump and his supporters caused the Jan. 6 insurrection and that it was just as bad as the rest of the world (including Kevin McCarthy, William Barr and Ivanka) knows it was, then you wouldn't have to worry about Liz Cheney.
I never said the rioting was justified but however your inbred brain wants to process what I wrote and whatever upsets you the most, let’s go with that.
😆 🤡
Pretty funny that, prior to 1/6/21, you thought Liz was just behind Trump in who you hated most. And your ild refered to her dad as Darth Vadar.
You seem to be a great judge of character. lmao!
These imbeciles want Trump to be their king.
They don’t care that he’s a career criminal con artist and serial liar. It’s not about that. These mooks just want to “own the Libs”.
I think there may be some new specific connections drawn in the hearing starting Monday, from what they're saying. Maybe they're building up to another major disclosure you'll ignore.
But Barr's and Ivanka's testimony and old texts from pre-asskissing Kevin McCarthy were new to me and don't leave much room for real people to doubt what Trump did. You may not care, but he did it.
If you guys had offered a real candidate who hadn't been afraid to disagree with Trump, Biden would not have won. Could Biden have won against someone sensible like Kasich? Romney? Boehner? Even Pence? All doubtful.
But Biden won against Trump. The Republican Trump-supporters put Biden in office. And, Trump's fundraising success this year along with his doling of his extra money only to blindly-sycophantic supporters tells me Trump is going to run in 2024 -- he apparently expects to be President again and wants to finance a Congress full of Marjorie Greenes and Dr. Ozzes to support his next term.
"The Republican Trump-supporters put Biden in office." lmao!
"Don't MAKE me vote for Biden!" 🤣🤣🤣
Maybe.
I think the navy seals and other real special forces wear similar pants with pockets to carry all their specific stuff needed for specific missions, but I'd guess the Proud Boys are thinking more about trying not to look like baggage handlers at the airport.
Grow up. (Emojis are not counter-arguments or brilliant thoughts.)
Could Biden have possibly beaten any other Republican in 2020 other than Trump?
Republicans seem ready to nominate Trump again. Duh.
DeSantis is Trump Light 1.01. Duh.
Who are your Republican statesmen? Your Republican leaders?
Grow up. I told you other things in that post as well.
You didn't disagree with them.
Grow up.
When did Trump concede? Say what you will about Hillary, but she has infinitely more class than Agent Orange. She conceded the day after the election, she didn't try to reenact the War of 1812.
Last edited:
Wrong.
Hillary Clinton Claims She Won the 2016 Election
On Tuesday during an interview on PBS News Hour, failed 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton bizarrely claimed that she won the 2016 election against President Donald Trump. This statement is clearly false considering President Trump is in the White House and she is not. The comment from...
trendingpolitics.com
Couldn't have been any clearer to me. It like arguing with your kid, when on a perfectly cloudless day, you look at the sky and say it is blue, and they just look right back and say, "No it is not, it is green"
I literally copied and pasted your own words.
You posted that the riots were justified.
Take your L and try harder next time.
13 minutes. Your entire POV is built on emotionally manipulative bullshit. There is a reason you don't know about Timpa and you do Floyd. You should ask why.
Last edited:
Those pesky facts.
Police kill more whites than blacks, but minority deaths generate more outrage: analysis
Nobel Prize-winning novelist Toni Morrison says she wants to see an officer shoot an unarmed white teenager in the back before agreeing that the “conversation about race” is over, but she almost certainly already has received her wish.m.washingtontimes.com
And black people commit far more violent crimes on average than white people. A black criminal is probably less likely to be killed by police than a white criminal.
You use the term FACTS, but don't present any. What you did was link to a Washington Times article that made assertions (that you apparently assumed were FACTS), but this article doesn't link to any FACTS. I looked thru it, and they obviously wrote it on the assumption that folks would just take their word for the claims they make. But they present ZERO EVIDENCE for the assertions they make...
Meanwhile, mac "liked" your post, but his presentation of facts was a WSJ OPINION. Full disclosure, I wasn't able to read the actual WSJ Editorial commentary, and maybe they actually cited sources. But if so, why not link to the study or research they're relying on, instead of presenting a clearly labelled opinion as factual evidence?
Meanwhile Plax clearly linked to the actual study which disputes both of your claims and was published in 2020. So while Plax posted opinion, as did both of you Plax provided evidence while both of you basically linked to other OPINION pieces...Let's make this simple. You posted that the summer of love riots were justified, paraphrasing, based on cops treatment of blacks. Systemic racism. The figures don't support that during the salient time period leading up to the riots. Your premise is wrong. They were not justified. They were stoked by media and Dems. Their election not to shut them down was tacit approval. It led to billions in damages, livelihoods lost, over 2,000 cops being injured, and the Defund the Police charade that we're still feeling the consequences of today.
Opinion | The Myth of Systemic Police Racism
Hold officers accountable who use excessive force. But there’s no evidence of widespread racial bias.www.wsj.com
"In 2019 police officers fatally shot 1,004 people, most of whom were armed or otherwise dangerous. African-Americans were about a quarter of those killed by cops last year (235), a ratio that has remained stable since 2015. That share of black victims is less than what the black crime rate would predict, since police shootings are a function of how often officers encounter armed and violent suspects. In 2018, the latest year for which such data have been published, African-Americans made up 53% of known homicide offenders in the U.S. and commit about 60% of robberies, though they are 13% of the population."
Mapping fatal police violence across U.S. metropolitan areas: Overall rates and racial/ethnic inequities, 2013-2017
Background & methods Recent social movements have highlighted fatal police violence as an enduring public health problem in the United States. To solve it, the public requires basic information, such as understanding where rates of fatal police violence are particularly high, and for which...
Btw, I seem to remember Plax is from Pittsburgh originally, but has retired to Florida. Not sure of his age, but I am pretty certain he's not a "kid"...
And with regards to the violence at BLM protests, there is a great deal of evidence a significant portion of it came from outside agitators...
The umbella guy in Minneapolis... Notice that even during the BLM protests that pesky term "white Supremacist" keeps turning up? Of course you guys don't think it's a problem...
Man who helped ignite George Floyd riots identified as white supremacist: Police
A masked umbrella-wielding man helped incite riots and looting in the immediate aftermath of George Floyd's death, police said.
An Intercept article which interviewed Former FBI counter terrorist expert Michael Jordan...
"German argued that the impulse to paint both sides of the political spectrum with the same brush, despite the fact that only the far right is actively killing people, is among the most dangerous features of modern American law enforcement. In his review of the documents produced in response to the recent protests, German said purported “threats” from antifa were routinely overblown, often framed vandalism as terrorism and were typically absent of concrete evidence of serious criminal activity.
And this passage points out why it's dangerous for the people on this board who get their NEWS from Facebook (then post it here). And why these stories gain traction...
“It’s chatter, it’s ‘intelligence reporting suggests,’” he said. On June 2, for example, the Department of Homeland Security circulated a tweet to law enforcement agencies across the country reporting that antifa was stashing bricks to “fuel protests.” The intelligence made its way to a law enforcement fusion center in Main
e. Last week, Mainer magazine tracked down the original source of the tweet: a far-right, pro-Trump biker who goes by the name “the Wolfman,” who claimed that Facebook kept deleting his brick-planting evidence “because they are BLM supporters.”
Leaked Documents Show Police Knew Far-Right Extremists Were the Real Threat at Protests, Not “Antifa”
An analysis of leaked law enforcement documents reveals an obsession with “antifa” despite evidence of threats of violence to police and protesters.
theintercept.com
Last edited:
I posted the actual statistics dumbass. About a thousand times on this board.You use the term FACTS, but don't present any. What you did was link to a Washington Times article that made assertions (that you apparently assumed were FACTS), but this article doesn't link to any FACTS. I looked thru it, and they obviously wrote it on the assumption that folks would just take their word for the claims they make. But they present ZERO EVIDENCE for the assertions they make...
Meanwhile, mac "liked" your post, but his presentation of facts was a WSJ OPINION. Full disclosure, I wasn't able to read the actual WSJ Editorial commentary, and maybe they actually cited sources. But if so, why not link to the study or research they're relying on, instead of presenting a clearly labelled opinion as factual evidence?
Meanwhile Plax clearly linked to the actual study which disputes both of your claims and was published in 2020. So while Plax posted opinion, as did both of you Plax provided evidence while both of you basically linked to other OPINION pieces...
Mapping fatal police violence across U.S. metropolitan areas: Overall rates and racial/ethnic inequities, 2013-2017
Background & methods Recent social movements have highlighted fatal police violence as an enduring public health problem in the United States. To solve it, the public requires basic information, such as understanding where rates of fatal police violence are particularly high, and for which...journals.plos.org
Btw, I seem to remember Plax is from Pittsburgh originally, but has retired to Florida. Not sure of his age, but I don't think he's a kid...
And with regards to the violence at BLM protests, there is a great deal of evidence a significant portion of it came from outside agitators...
The umbella guy in Minneapolis...
abcnews.go.com/US/man-helped-ignite-george-floyd-riots-identified-white/story?id=72051536
The Boogie Boy who murdered the 2 cops in NoCal... An Intercept article which interviewed Former FBI counter terrorist expert Michael Jordan...
"German argued that the impulse to paint both sides of the political spectrum with the same brush, despite the fact that only the far right is actively killing people, is among the most dangerous features of modern American law enforcement. In his review of the documents produced in response to the recent protests, German said purported “threats” from antifa were routinely overblown, often framed vandalism as terrorism and were typically absent of concrete evidence of serious criminal activity.
“It’s chatter, it’s ‘intelligence reporting suggests,’” he said. On June 2, for example, the Department of Homeland Security circulated a tweet to law enforcement agencies across the country reporting that antifa was stashing bricks to “fuel protests.” The intelligence made its way to a law enforcement fusion center in Maine. Last week, Mainer magazine tracked down the original source of the tweet: a far-right, pro-Trump biker who goes by the name “the Wolfman,” who claimed that Facebook kept deleting his brick-planting evidence “because they are BLM supporters.”
Leaked Documents Show Police Knew Far-Right Extremists Were the Real Threat at Protests, Not “Antifa”
An analysis of leaked law enforcement documents reveals an obsession with “antifa” despite evidence of threats of violence to police and protesters.
The WSJ cites ACTUAL statistics you stupid ass. Go to DOJ. ALL THE STATS ARE THERE YOU MSNBC BRAIN DEAD CUCKYou use the term FACTS, but don't present any. What you did was link to a Washington Times article that made assertions (that you apparently assumed were FACTS), but this article doesn't link to any FACTS. I looked thru it, and they obviously wrote it on the assumption that folks would just take their word for the claims they make. But they present ZERO EVIDENCE for the assertions they make...
Meanwhile, mac "liked" your post, but his presentation of facts was a WSJ OPINION. Full disclosure, I wasn't able to read the actual WSJ Editorial commentary, and maybe they actually cited sources. But if so, why not link to the study or research they're relying on, instead of presenting a clearly labelled opinion as factual evidence?
Meanwhile Plax clearly linked to the actual study which disputes both of your claims and was published in 2020. So while Plax posted opinion, as did both of you Plax provided evidence while both of you basically linked to other OPINION pieces...
Mapping fatal police violence across U.S. metropolitan areas: Overall rates and racial/ethnic inequities, 2013-2017
Background & methods Recent social movements have highlighted fatal police violence as an enduring public health problem in the United States. To solve it, the public requires basic information, such as understanding where rates of fatal police violence are particularly high, and for which...
Btw, I seem to remember Plax is from Pittsburgh originally, but has retired to Florida. Not sure of his age, but I don't think he's a kid...
And with regards to the violence at BLM protests, there is a great deal of evidence a significant portion of it came from outside agitators...
The umbella guy in Minneapolis... Notice that even during the BLM protests that pesky term "white Supremacist" keeps turning up? Of course you guys don't think it's a problem...
Man who helped ignite George Floyd riots identified as white supremacist: Police
A masked umbrella-wielding man helped incite riots and looting in the immediate aftermath of George Floyd's death, police said.abcnews.go.com
The Boogie Boy who murdered the 2 cops in NoCal... An Intercept article which interviewed Former FBI counter terrorist expert Michael Jordan...
"German argued that the impulse to paint both sides of the political spectrum with the same brush, despite the fact that only the far right is actively killing people, is among the most dangerous features of modern American law enforcement. In his review of the documents produced in response to the recent protests, German said purported “threats” from antifa were routinely overblown, often framed vandalism as terrorism and were typically absent of concrete evidence of serious criminal activity.
And this passage points out why it's dangerous for the people on this board who get their NEWS from Facebook (then post it here). And why these stories gain traction...
“It’s chatter, it’s ‘intelligence reporting suggests,’” he said. On June 2, for example, the Department of Homeland Security circulated a tweet to law enforcement agencies across the country reporting that antifa was stashing bricks to “fuel protests.” The intelligence made its way to a law enforcement fusion center in Maine. Last week, Mainer magazine tracked down the original source of the tweet: a far-right, pro-Trump biker who goes by the name “the Wolfman,” who claimed that Facebook kept deleting his brick-planting evidence “because they are BLM supporters.”
Leaked Documents Show Police Knew Far-Right Extremists Were the Real Threat at Protests, Not “Antifa”
An analysis of leaked law enforcement documents reveals an obsession with “antifa” despite evidence of threats of violence to police and protesters.
“A significant portion of it came from outside agitators”.You use the term FACTS, but don't present any. What you did was link to a Washington Times article that made assertions (that you apparently assumed were FACTS), but this article doesn't link to any FACTS. I looked thru it, and they obviously wrote it on the assumption that folks would just take their word for the claims they make. But they present ZERO EVIDENCE for the assertions they make...
Meanwhile, mac "liked" your post, but his presentation of facts was a WSJ OPINION. Full disclosure, I wasn't able to read the actual WSJ Editorial commentary, and maybe they actually cited sources. But if so, why not link to the study or research they're relying on, instead of presenting a clearly labelled opinion as factual evidence?
Meanwhile Plax clearly linked to the actual study which disputes both of your claims and was published in 2020. So while Plax posted opinion, as did both of you Plax provided evidence while both of you basically linked to other OPINION pieces...
Mapping fatal police violence across U.S. metropolitan areas: Overall rates and racial/ethnic inequities, 2013-2017
Background & methods Recent social movements have highlighted fatal police violence as an enduring public health problem in the United States. To solve it, the public requires basic information, such as understanding where rates of fatal police violence are particularly high, and for which...
Btw, I seem to remember Plax is from Pittsburgh originally, but has retired to Florida. Not sure of his age, but I don't think he's a kid...
And with regards to the violence at BLM protests, there is a great deal of evidence a significant portion of it came from outside agitators...
The umbella guy in Minneapolis... Notice that even during the BLM protests that pesky term "white Supremacist" keeps turning up? Of course you guys don't think it's a problem...
Man who helped ignite George Floyd riots identified as white supremacist: Police
A masked umbrella-wielding man helped incite riots and looting in the immediate aftermath of George Floyd's death, police said.
The Boogie Boy who murdered the 2 cops in NoCal... An Intercept article which interviewed Former FBI counter terrorist expert Michael Jordan...
"German argued that the impulse to paint both sides of the political spectrum with the same brush, despite the fact that only the far right is actively killing people, is among the most dangerous features of modern American law enforcement. In his review of the documents produced in response to the recent protests, German said purported “threats” from antifa were routinely overblown, often framed vandalism as terrorism and were typically absent of concrete evidence of serious criminal activity.
And this passage points out why it's dangerous for the people on this board who get their NEWS from Facebook (then post it here). And why these stories gain traction...
“It’s chatter, it’s ‘intelligence reporting suggests,’” he said. On June 2, for example, the Department of Homeland Security circulated a tweet to law enforcement agencies across the country reporting that antifa was stashing bricks to “fuel protests.” The intelligence made its way to a law enforcement fusion center in Maine. Last week, Mainer magazine tracked down the original source of the tweet: a far-right, pro-Trump biker who goes by the name “the Wolfman,” who claimed that Facebook kept deleting his brick-planting evidence “because they are BLM supporters.”
Leaked Documents Show Police Knew Far-Right Extremists Were the Real Threat at Protests, Not “Antifa”
An analysis of leaked law enforcement documents reveals an obsession with “antifa” despite evidence of threats of violence to police and protesters.
Then lists 2 people. 😂
He's a ****ing moron. And his take on cops is offensive. I hope someone beats the piss out of him and no cop shows
Similar threads
