It was a very close call. Nothing showed a reason to overturn it.to see IU get a favorable replay call. The ball was clearly out before the plain was broken. Sucks
Biased referees? Oookay. Lol. The ball looked like it made it, and there was nothing to reverse the call.In that case, nothing proved that it was a touchdown. Again, at the mercy of the biased referees. And announcers I might add. Sick 'em Wilson and IU.
Only if you remove your tin foil hat.Take your Hawkeye shirt off.
It would have been Iowa ball 3rd and goal. Ball wasn't fumbled out of bounds through the end zone. Unless the ball crossed the plane. Because it was knocked backwards.Agree. Should have been IU ball at the 20
Could be, I'll have to take another look. Either way, no way to tell from the camera angle whether or not the ball crossed.Looked like it was knocked forward through end zone on the replay
Why is it that anyone who disagrees with you is a conspiracy theorist. No honest disagreements; everybody else in the world is nuts. Really?Only if you remove your tin foil hat.
biased referees IU is pitiful..Iowa doesn't need referees to beat you..Sour GrapesIn that case, nothing proved that it was a touchdown. Again, at the mercy of the biased referees. And announcers I might add. Sick 'em Wilson and IU.
Are you going to ask the other poster why he to.d me to take off my Hawkeyes shirt, or did you really not read what he said? Really, you didn't even read what he said? Really?Why is it that anyone who disagrees with you is a conspiracy theorist. No honest disagreements; everybody else in the world is nuts. Really?
Ok, you have a point. We're all devoted Hoosier fans here. And danged sad ones on Saturday afternoons.Are you going to ask the other poster why he to.d me to take off my Hawkeyes shirt, or did you really not read what he said?