Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe Haarms can walk-on at IU.
They have another 7'3" player coming in next year, Zach Edey, that is going to be just as annoying as Haarms. His own highlight reel starts with him acting very Haarms-like.
Haarms will be a graduate transfer. He enrolled at Purdue in January of 2017.Edey looks pretty agile for a guy that height/age -- and that's about all a coach can ask for from such a rare specimen. I guess time will tell if he's ready for B10 level competition next season. But, even if he's not, it's a good starting point.
As for Haarms, I have to imagine this has to do with him losing his starting spot after the hip injury. He hasn't graduated yet, right? Either way, it's not like Haarms was ever an all-B10 level talent. It's a loss for them but nothing that Painter is going to lose sleep over, IMO.
His decline in playing time seemed to coincide with Williams’ assent as a legit Big 10 low post player. Worrisome that Painter seems to be putting together another pretty decent team, and Haarms probably saw his prospects for playing time trending down next season.Edey looks pretty agile for a guy that height/age -- and that's about all a coach can ask for from such a rare specimen. I guess time will tell if he's ready for B10 level competition next season. But, even if he's not, it's a good starting point.
As for Haarms, I have to imagine this has to do with him losing his starting spot after the hip injury. He hasn't graduated yet, right? Either way, it's not like Haarms was ever an all-B10 level talent. It's a loss for them but nothing that Painter is going to lose sleep over, IMO.
His decline in playing time seemed to coincide with Williams’ assent as a legit Big 10 low post player. Worrisome that Painter seems to be putting together another pretty decent team, and Haarms probably saw his prospects for playing time trending down next season.
Haarms also suffered multiple concussions last year and hurt his hip but he was by far Purdue's best player to start the year. Williams is progressing no doubt but he has limitations due to his size and playing anything more than 25 mpg is going to be a stretch. Purdue has ZERO interior depth behind Williams (Emmanuel Dowuona will be in his third year in the program and has only played 30 minutes and Edey is/was a redshirt candidate), not to mention they are extremely weak at the 4 position. Wheeler was a train wreck last year and Mason Gillis hasn't played in a game in over 2 years. This is a notable loss for Purdue any way you try and slice it.
It's funny, but I heard alot of that this year too before they swept us again. I'll believe they're down when we actually beat them for a change.
Where do they keep getting these goons year, after year, after..?.They have another 7'3" player coming in next year, Zach Edey, that is going to be just as annoying as Haarms. His own highlight reel starts with him acting very Haarms-like.
It’s a loss, but he’s a 10-15 minute a game player for them, tops, and I’m sure he wanted a much bigger role than he was getting and was going to get.Haarms also suffered multiple concussions last year and hurt his hip but he was by far Purdue's best player to start the year. Williams is progressing no doubt but he has limitations due to his size and playing anything more than 25 mpg is going to be a stretch. Purdue has ZERO interior depth behind Williams (Emmanuel Dowuona will be in his third year in the program and has only played 30 minutes and Edey is/was a redshirt candidate), not to mention they are extremely weak at the 4 position. Wheeler was a train wreck last year and Mason Gillis hasn't played in a game in over 2 years. This is a notable loss for Purdue any way you try and slice it.
No chance he was a top 2-3 returning player for them. Not even close, as his dwindling role absolutely confirmed.Purdue sweeping IU has no bearing on the fact that Purdue was "down" last year. They were. They were 16-15, 9-11 in conference and nowhere close to making the tournament. Haarms was a top 2 or 3 returning player for them. This is a significant loss for them.
Maybe when he cut his hair, he saw the light.That hair flipping fvck was the most disliked player in the B1G. Whiney and left the broilees in a bind. good riddance.
Purdue sweeping IU has no bearing on the fact that Purdue was "down" last year. They were. They were 16-15, 9-11 in conference and nowhere close to making the tournament. Haarms was a top 2 or 3 returning player for them. This is a significant loss for them.
link?
Link?If you followed college basketball this year, you knew that Purdue was right there to make the tournament until they lost to Rutgers. If they had won that game, they would’ve likely only needed one win in the BTT to get in. Saying they were “nowhere close to making the tournament” is laughable. Not with Purdue’s metrics.
No chance he was a top 2-3 returning player for them. Not even close, as his dwindling role absolutely confirmed.
Nowhere close to making the tournament? Well that’s completely false. And no Haarms wasn’t a top 2 or 3 returning guy for us. Maybe 4th or 5th.
Nowhere close to making the tournament? Well that’s completely false. And no Haarms wasn’t a top 2 or 3 returning guy for us. Maybe 4th or 5th.
He was healthy for much of the year yet his role diminished. That wasn’t due to injury, it was because other guys were more valuable for them. If you watched much of them, it wasn’t difficult to see. Saying he was one of their top 2 or 3 players isn’t accurate at all.His role diminished because of injury, I already explained that. He was a 12 and 7 guy playing 20 mpg before suffered a concussion and a hip flexor that he carried throughout the year. Along with Williams and Hunter, he was their most productive player on both ends of the court and that’s not really up for debate. This is a big loss for Purdue not only from a production standpoint, but an experience and depth perspective.
If they beat Rutgers and win a game in the BTT, they were in, especially if IU was in.They were 16-15 going into the BTT with a date with Ohio State. It’s not a given they’d have won that and a 16-16, not only was Purdue nowhere close to making the tournament, an NIT birth wasn’t even a given as they would have been .500. I stand by my assessment.
He was healthy for much of the year yet his role diminished. That wasn’t due to injury, it was because other guys were more valuable for them. If you watched much of them, it wasn’t difficult to see. Saying he was one of their top 2 or 3 players isn’t accurate at all.
If they beat Rutgers and win a game in the BTT, they were in, especially if IU was in.
It dipped for awhile but he was healthy for much of the conference and his playing time still went down. It wasn’t hard to see. And no one ever believed he was Purdue’s best player.Not attributing his concussion and hip injury to his decrease in minutes is idiotic. He was by far and away Purdue’s best player pre injuries.
Beat Rutgers and win one in the BTT and they were in. Haarms their best player? Laughable.And they didn’t. Nowhere near making the tournament. And they needed to win 2 or 3 BTT games. They weren’t getting in at 17-15 either.
It dipped for awhile but he was healthy for much of the conference and his playing time still went down. It wasn’t hard to see. And no one ever believed he was Purdue’s best player.
And they didn’t. Nowhere near making the tournament. And they needed to win 2 or 3 BTT games. They weren’t getting in at 17-15 either.
You said this . . . . “He was by far and away Purdue’s best player pre injuries.“Never said he was their “best” player. I said he was one of their 2-3 top returning players. Nice reading comprehension dolt.
You said this . . . . “He was by far and away Purdue’s best player pre injuries.“
That’s simply laughable.