China poses an urgent threat. Proposed bill is $250 billion in new spending. $52 billion to semiconductor industry. Bill is being debated now in the Senate.
China poses an urgent threat. Proposed bill is $250 billion in new spending. $52 billion to semiconductor industry. Bill is being debated now in the Senate.
Yes by the time they regulate SC’s the technology will shrink yet again. Every time it shrinks, the design rules (nand, nor, and flip-flop spatial geometries) for the VHDL compilers change. Intel, Apple, QuallComm, Nvidia don’t need the corporate welfare for facilities that can’t be built in CA‘s business environment before the equipment would be obsolete.the US shouldn't subsidize the chip industry absent stringently regulating it as well, which won't happen.
what the US should do, is set up shop themselves, just as they did with NASA back in the day.
Brilliant idea, we have fallen behind Taiwan by a large margin, cannot afford other countries passing.China poses an urgent threat. Proposed bill is $250 billion in new spending. $52 billion to semiconductor industry. Bill is being debated now in the Senate.
I see no reason to cut a check to one highly profitable industry.the US shouldn't subsidize the chip industry absent stringently regulating it as well, which won't happen.
what the US should do, is set up shop themselves, just as they did with NASA back in the day.
We need to end policies that indirectly benefit China. We need to strengthen our partnership with Taiwan. I’m doubtful this bill makes us more competitive with China. In fact, it might make us less competitive.Brilliant idea, we have fallen behind Taiwan by a large margin, cannot afford other countries passing.
Why is that? China is trying hard to catch up. As we just discovered, depending solely on Taiwan has huge drawbacks.We need to end policies that indirectly benefit China. We need to strengthen our partnership with Taiwan. I’m doubtful this bill makes us more competitive with China. In fact, it might make us less competitive.
Yes by the time they regulate SC’s the technology will shrink yet again. Every time it shrinks, the design rules (nand, nor, and flip-flop spatial geometries) for the VHDL compilers change. Intel, Apple, QuallComm, Nvidia don’t need the corporate welfare for facilities that can’t be built in CA‘s business environment before the equipment would be obsolete.
There’s more gigaflops in my IPAD than all the CDCs in the Wrubel basement in the late ‘70s. Senate staffers can’t keep up with the pace of change.
The bill does not bar companies that do business in China from receiving subsidies.Why is that? China is trying hard to catch up. As we just discovered, depending solely on Taiwan has huge drawbacks.
Computer chips are not going to get less important, especially in military applications.
And wasn't Stoll already talking about his gigleflop in another thread?
Didn't Chucky force the removal of that being prevented?The bill does not bar companies that do business in China from receiving subsidies.
Right, sell them our inferior chips instead of Taiwan. Win-win.The bill does not bar companies that do business in China from receiving subsidies.
I’m not sure about that. It’s a lot of money for one industry that is highly profitable.Didn't Chucky force the removal of that being prevented?
I think we are both opposed to helping China build its industry/infrastructure. If a semiconductor manufacturer takes a subsidy to build a plant in Ohio or any other state, what keeps them from using that money to bolster their manufacturing operations in China?Right, sell them our inferior chips instead of Taiwan. Win-win.
$39 of the $52 is for building or modernizing domestic plants. $13 to the National Science Foundation for research. How do they build a domestic plant in China?I think we are both opposed to helping China build its industry/infrastructure. If a semiconductor manufacturer takes a subsidy to build a plant in Ohio or any other state, what keeps them from using that money to bolster their manufacturing operations in China?
The legislation needs fixed
One of the great life lessons: money is fungible.I think we are both opposed to helping China build its industry/infrastructure. If a semiconductor manufacturer takes a subsidy to build a plant in Ohio or any other state, what keeps them from using that money to bolster their manufacturing operations in China?
The legislation needs fixed