This year made zero sense. Consistent would be the last word to describe IU this year. The MSU wins are a glimpse of what this team could be if they can fix the weaknesses.
You know what...you may be onto something...This year made zero sense. Consistent would be the last word to describe IU this year.
Adding TJD and a Brunk to the front court helps. If IU can get Beverly or Quinones and another shooter, that would be huge. Rob is going to be great to have for 4 years. The lightbulb is starting to come on for Devonte. Al is limited, but he is solid.Two freshmen and two Sophomores (with one playing out of position at the 4). A 2 freshmen one Sophomore backcourt. Of course they were inconsistent. Green continuing to improve his decision making would play massive dividends. Rob was solid for a freshman and should keep growing fast as a player. Al was the most consistent player we has in the backcourt and has obviously worked hard on his game. The NCAA is very backcourt driven and upperclassmen there really make differences. Things are looking up to me...
I think Jake showed some potential. He certainly looked like a goofball freshman at times and kind of skinny. But, he looked to be every bit of 6'9, played hard, and looked pretty mobile. Agreed about De'Ron: he needs to get healthy. Hunter is a wildcard and could be big if healthy.Phinisee could be very close to a Winston by his senior year...Those three gaurds if they work on their game ..Give us a fighter's chance next year.
But yhe middle may be a bigger question.
Davis has to get in good shape and stay on the floor TJD.has to go grow up fast ..And realize how physical the Big Ten is ..Hopefully Race or another grad transfer helps..Idk maybe Jake can help a few positive minutes..
The advantage Davis has over last year is that he's not trying to rehab all summer so he can actually work on his game, strength, and conditioning. I how that really pays off next year.Phinisee could be very close to a Winston by his senior year...Those three gaurds if they work on their game ..Give us a fighter's chance next year.
But the middle may be a bigger question.
Davis has to get in good shape and stay on the floor TJD.has to go grow up fast ..And realize how physical the Big Ten is ..Hopefully Race or another grad transfer helps..Idk maybe Jake can help a few positive minutes..
If you seriously believe that this year they had a top 10 team in terms of talent or that there are 340 coaches that are better then you really are delusional. It might be time for grandpa fpeaugh to go into a nursing home where you can get 24/7 care.Top 10 team, bottom 10 coach. It really is that simple.
Top 10 team, bottom 10 coach. It really is that simple.
Every living soul who knows anything at all about college basketball would agree that you are an idiot.Top 10 team, bottom 10 coach. It really is that simple.
He probably should’ve changed those numbers from 10 to 40 or so...Every living soul who knows anything at all about college basketball would agree that you are an idiot.
Top 10 team, bottom 10 coach. It really is that simple.
Wish everyone on the forum was as knowledgeable as you. Amazing.Top 10 team, bottom 10 coach. It really is that simple.
Top 10 team, bottom 10 coach. It really is that simple.
Top 10 team, bottom 10 coach. It really is that simple.
But, but . . . KENTUCKY MADE THE TOURNAMENT!!Did you copy and paste this from Rupp's Rafters today? There are a lot of posts saying the same on there.
We need more one and dones.
Did you copy and paste this from Rupp's Rafters today? There are a lot of posts saying the same on there.
We need more one and dones.
They actually made the Elite 8 for the 7th time in 10 years. Something we haven’t done in 17 years. The last time we were there George W was in his 2nd year as president, 9/11 had just happened, the iPhone was 6 years away from even existing, and most people didn’t even carry a cell phone.But, but . . . KENTUCKY MADE THE TOURNAMENT!!
What is the goal? Just getting to Elite 8's / Sweet 16's? If that was the case we might as well have stuck with Tom Crean.Yet you guys are criticizing UK for being there 7/10 years. As if they have a bad strategy but we don’t. Absolutely clueless stuff from a far away fantasy land.
They actually made the Elite 8 for the 7th time in 10 years. Something we haven’t done in 17 years. The last time we were there George W was in his 2nd year as president, 9/11 had just happened, the iPhone was 6 years away from even existing, and most people didn’t even carry a cell phone.
Yet you guys are criticizing UK for being there 7/10 years. As if they have a bad strategy but we don’t. Absolutely clueless stuff from a far away fantasy land.
Rebuild with Archie's recruits year 1.
What is the goal? Just getting to Elite 8's / Sweet 16's? If that was the case we might as well have stuck with Tom Crean.
Turning the roster over every year via a OAD approach leaves you perpetually young. And the deeper you get into tournament play that inexperience too often comes back to bite you. It did both Duke and Kentucky this year - and Duke might have had the best collection of talent (from a raw talent standpoint, anyways) of any team since the OAD rule was put into place in 2006. At least Duke is getting the best of the best to sign up to try to counter the effects of inexperience - like Kentucky used to do.
You say so often having the best players gives you the best chance to win - which I agree with. Where we differ is how we define "best players".
You tend to think just getting raw talent gets it done - and, again, if just getting close to the Final Four every year is the goal, that'll work. You might break thru every once in a while and win a title, but with a roster turnover every year you'll be hard pressed to do it (hasn't happened in the OAD era since 2006). Only UK (2012) and Duke (2015) have won titles with several prominent freshman, but each a significant veteran (Darius Miller, Quinn Cook) that played a BIG part of each team.
@Paterfamilias could probably give us an expanded graphic from what he provided the other day, but all of the teams deep in the tournament have veteran players making significant contributions. Since Kentucky stopped getting the top OAD players, they've lost in the 2nd round (2016 IU), Elite 8 (2017 UNC), Sweet 16 (2018 Kansas St) and Elite 8 (2019 Auburn). In the last two years these great UK teams had the bracket open up to them both times - last year with upsets to where they only had to beat a #9 seed (Kansas State - who had not been ranked at all the entire year) and a #11 seed (Loyola-Chicago) and this year with Auburn (who lost their best player to an ACL injury from Friday night. They failed miserably both times.
Have tried to explain this to you on several occasions, but you keep rooting for the Wildcats. The rest of us want to see a program be built to where veteran guys give you a better chance at consistent success.
EDIT: Nice tweet from ESPN Stats & Info. I know, there’s been no change in the last 4 years for Calipari, right @fpeaugh?
Naw, the only thing that's simple is you baboso.. ..Top 10 team, bottom 10 coach. It really is that simple.
And there our people who say Archie don't have talent. Talent was there coaching and control of the team not there. Chris Beard lost 5 players he is in the final four Izzo lost 2 Lottery picks..