something to ponder--not to be critical of Nate, but he was, considering the running attack and protection, imo, just a slightly above average quarterback. He missed many wide open receivers and posed little threat as a runner, yet was very valuable due to the lack of a proven back-up. This isn't meant to denigrate Nate, just to throw out the idea that IU has a good offensive system, good running backs, and offensive line; it would help to have a star at quarterback, but it may well be that we have a very capable quarterback that will be just as productive as Nate.
for those that are worried about the QB position---
- Thread starter sequoia1
- Start date
Latest posts
-
-
lose to Oregon and win the rest does anyone have any idea- Latest: daddyhoosier
-
-
-