ADVERTISEMENT

Fetal personhood statutes

TMFT

All-Big Ten
Nov 4, 2019
3,984
8,868
113
This might be the swim up bar talking. But for states with fetal personhood statutes:

Is there anything that would stop any person from basically anywhere in the world from filling out an affidavit that their child was conceived in a fetal personhood state (when the statute was active) and applying for citizenship?
 
This might be the swim up bar talking. But for states with fetal personhood statutes:

Is there anything that would stop any person from basically anywhere in the world from filling out an affidavit that their child was conceived in a fetal personhood state (when the statute was active) and applying for citizenship?
Where's the bar you are using?
 
This might be the swim up bar talking. But for states with fetal personhood statutes:

Is there anything that would stop any person from basically anywhere in the world from filling out an affidavit that their child was conceived in a fetal personhood state (when the statute was active) and applying for citizenship?
Don't make a conservative pick between abortion and anti-immigration: that is how heads explode.
 
This might be the swim up bar talking. But for states with fetal personhood statutes:

Is there anything that would stop any person from basically anywhere in the world from filling out an affidavit that their child was conceived in a fetal personhood state (when the statute was active) and applying for citizenship?
Show me your visa/passport indicating when you entered the country. Let's start there.
 
This might be the swim up bar talking. But for states with fetal personhood statutes:

Is there anything that would stop any person from basically anywhere in the world from filling out an affidavit that their child was conceived in a fetal personhood state (when the statute was active) and applying for citizenship?
Citizenship is solely defined by federal law, and the 14th Amendment requires someone to be BORN in this country for citizenship to attach. State “fetal personhood” statutes cannot redefine the meaning of “born” for purposes of citizenship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMFT
Citizenship is solely defined by federal law, and the 14th Amendment requires someone to be BORN in this country for citizenship to attach. State “fetal personhood” statutes cannot redefine the meaning of “born” for purposes of citizenship.
Do you think it can apply to state citizenship and not federal?
 
I should also mention that I’m jealous - I’ve never been to a place that had a swim up bar. Unless you count a raft in a lake that had a cooler of beer on it. 😃
 
I should also mention that I’m jealous - I’ve never been to a place that had a swim up bar. Unless you count a raft in a lake that had a cooler of beer on it. 😃
Iberostar Selection Paraiso Lindo in Riviera Maya.

Super great for families.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Noodle
I should also mention that I’m jealous - I’ve never been to a place that had a swim up bar. Unless you count a raft in a lake that had a cooler of beer on it. 😃

surely-you-cant-be-serious-are-you-kidding.gif
 
Thus the affidavits in the original hypothetical.
That would not be enough. You would be changing the laws for fetal personhood, the immigration laws and citizenship could be adjusted with it.

Swearing "I was there" with no proof would be a quick throw out to me. I wouldn't even consider a case where the only evidence was basically a written pinky swear.
 
Citizenship is solely defined by federal law, and the 14th Amendment requires someone to be BORN in this country for citizenship to attach. State “fetal personhood” statutes cannot redefine the meaning of “born” for purposes of citizenship.
The 14th Amendment does not require someone to be born for citizenship to attach. It requires citizenship to attach to anyone who was born in this country. As such, it sets a floor, not a limit, to citizenship. Federal law has extended citizenship further than the 14th Amendment requires, such as to the Indian tribes, and to children of Americans born abroad.

I'm not sure of any specific provision that restricts this power only to the federal government (although it certainly makes sense to do so).

Edit: Upon further reflection I think the Citizenship Clause in Article I can be fairly read to reserve all regulation of citizenship to the federal government.
 
Last edited:
Iberostar Selection Paraiso Lindo in Riviera Maya.

Super great for families.

I stayed at the adults only resort there, think it was the Grand Paraiso or something like that. Great swim-up bar there, nice place, fabulous service, pretty good golf course on site too
 
Last edited:
The 14th Amendment does not require someone to be born for citizenship to attach. It requires citizenship to attach to anyone who was born in this country. As such, it sets a floor, not a limit, to citizenship. Federal law has extended citizenship further than the 14th Amendment requires, such as to the Indian tribes, and to children of Americans born abroad.

I'm not sure of any specific provision that restricts this power only to the federal government (although it certainly makes sense to do so).

Edit: Upon further reflection I think the Citizenship Clause in Article I can be fairly read to reserve all regulation of citizenship to the federal government.
Correct, but I was referring to the suggestion that a state law declaring personhood at conception would somehow lead to citizenship at conception. A federal law could, I suppose, make conception in the US enough for citizenship. Of course that ain’t happening
 
Correct, but I was referring to the suggestion that a state law declaring personhood at conception would somehow lead to citizenship at conception. A federal law could, I suppose, make conception in the US enough for citizenship. Of course that ain’t happening
Yes, I think you are right on all counts.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT