I doubt "all" ... but I don't doubt that the ones who normally and consistently sign pro prospects are dirty. Even if only a 1/4 of players at that level are pay for play, that's probably still 30 to 40 schools and coaches who have the odds against them.
They stated it's "systematic" which I assumed meant wide spread and common practice. And remember the quote "anyone who had an nba pick in the last three years should worry". or something close.
So basically the top level players are being bought and sold by agents, runners, and coaches?
Plus, so far, it's only one agency, and, only one shoe company. If it stays that way most will slide. It would be a shame if only Adidas was implicated and Nike schools not.
What would be really sad is if UK comes through unscathed. I mean, is it even mathematically possible they funneled almost thirty pro players through their program in Cal's time and didn't pay one?