But the EC doesn't really mean that the candidates spend time in small states. Rather, it means that they spend time in competitive states, some of which are small, but many of which are large. Do candidates really spend time in Vermont? No, not really. But they do spend time in Florida and Ohio.I'd say yes - emphatically. If the Electoral College didn't exist, our Presidential candidates wouldn't give a flying fack about the smaller states in this country. They'd spend all their time campaigning on issues important to the largest cities and states in this country. Smaller states only get a small boost in their importance because of the EC, but it's enough of one that Presidential candidates (and ultimately the elected President) has to actually care about the issues in the mid to smaller states too. I've thought the EC was genius since I learned about it as a kid and only thought more of it as I learned more about it through my college years (started out as a Political Science major) and beyond. Long live the EC!
Besides, that's more a function of the winner-take-all nature of the EC, which is not actually enshrined in the Constitution. If all fifty states moved to the model used by Nebraska and Maine, I bet you'd see candidates focusing on a much wider variety of locales, since a lot of non-competitive states would contain individual districts that would be highly competitive.