ADVERTISEMENT

Dane Fife not returning

\

Fife walked on water until yesterday. People loved him until yesterday and many thought he would be the next coach. Right now it is very hip to hate Fife but there is not going to be any IU guy coming in after this fiasco and why would they when they see how quick the fan base will turn on you. I think it was handled terribly but i am in a very small minority most are just fine with this.
The fan base didn't hire him, nor fire him. I don't see people hating on him, but there obviously was a problem. It's been suspected on here for weeks/months and I pretty much ignored it, but now there's no question: he and CMW didn't see eye to eye. If CMW came to that realization, then he did the difficult, but correct thing. Tell me, what positive contribution can you cite that Dane Fife made this year? I don't believe he was credited with getting any of our recruits or commitments and that was noticeable to me.
 
Well it's certainly not going to win Woody any points among the fanbase, especially from his doubters. Fife was just fine at Michigan State over the past decade when they were winning the conference and going to final 4s.

If Woody is going to fire a popular alum a year after the decade of success he had at Michigan State, then he better win going forward and quickly.
Did you not get the memo FIfe is the enemy now!! Good luck ever getting any younger IU alumni to coach at IU again after this is all I can say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fpeaugh2
I think the bare minimum was making the tourney this year, we just squeaked that out. If he had not made the tourney it would have been a bad off season. Instead, we won a few when it mattered and got our names in the bracket again, thank god. If he continues momentum and is in the top 25 next year we are good. If not, people will be salty. 9-11 and in the play in will not fly next year.
Imagine this off-season had we not come back from 17 down versus MI. It would have been ugly.
 
I believe we have failed to finish above a .500 .conference record in 8 of the last 9 seasons. Most of those years we had a losing conference record. This year we made the tourney, and supposedly we would have 2 years ago if it wasn’t cancelled. Still, we had losing conference records in each of those years. In fact, is there a more consistent program in the conference?

Pencil IU in for 7-9 conference wins.

you are worried that people might “bitch”? Fans always do that. Even fans of championship programs.

We don’t have to better next year. IU fans are entirely comfortable finishing below .500 in conference play. If we finish 8th or 12th what’s the difference? Unless you are concerned about what is posted here.
I wish people who were fine with a .500 record would just enjoy the team, and let those who care about higher standards "bitch" all they want to. Either way, the fans in the first group are going to be content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snarlcakes
I think the bare minimum was making the tourney this year, we just squeaked that out. If he had not made the tourney it would have been a bad off season. Instead, we won a few when it mattered and got our names in the bracket again, thank god. If he continues momentum and is in the top 25 next year we are good. If not, people will be salty. 9-11 and in the play in will not fly next year.
I agree with what you are saying, and while it doesn't look promising to accomplish if TJD is truly gone, they're going to have to dig in, work the portal hard and put a team that performs at least a little better next year on the floor. On the one hand that seems difficult right now, but on the other, I thought we underperformed record-wise and were a better team than it showed record-wise. So, next year we need to come together and play better as a team. We're certainly due; it's been many, many years since an IU team surprised me and performed better as a team than I thought we were.
 
I believe we have failed to finish above a .500 .conference record in 8 of the last 9 seasons. Most of those years we had a losing conference record. This year we made the tourney, and supposedly we would have 2 years ago if it wasn’t cancelled. Still, we had losing conference records in each of those years. In fact, is there a more consistent program in the conference?

Pencil IU in for 7-9 conference wins.

you are worried that people might “bitch”? Fans always do that. Even fans of championship programs.

We don’t have to better next year. IU fans are entirely comfortable finishing below .500 in conference play. If we finish 8th or 12th what’s the difference? Unless you are concerned about what is posted here.
I think IU being invited to post season play made it a successful season, based upon our past performances, the ones a majority or our fans now are able to still remember. Next season, we can have a worse regular season record, but if we still make the tournament and can win our first (real) game in it, it will be another successful season by our "new normal" standards of futility. "Baby steps" will be heard along with occasional cries, coos and giggles.

Let all of Hoosier Nation be reminded, the unwavering love we once had for our Hall of Fame coach turned on him when it was decided he wasn't making a deep enough run in post season play. This was a major factor in the perceived notion he had lost his ability to relate to the changing mindset of the youth of the day.

"...and they just laughed and laughed!" (but not as hard as what is heard up at West Laugh-he-yet)
 
I agree with what you are saying, and while it doesn't look promising to accomplish if TJD is truly gone, they're going to have to dig in, work the portal hard and put a team that performs at least a little better next year on the floor. On the one hand that seems difficult right now, but on the other, I thought we underperformed record-wise and were a better team than it showed record-wise. So, next year we need to come together and play better as a team. We're certainly due; it's been many, many years since an IU team surprised me and performed better as a team than I thought we were.
Guard play….it has to be better
 
It sucks, all the way around, but he wasn't hired on a whim, and I doubt was fired on one. But sometimes hires that seem to make all the sense in the world, don't work out, and I can tell you from my experience, once you recognize that, the sooner you address it, the better for all.
Zoom out a little bit. The Woodson/Fife hire was sold on IU brotherhood and establishing some continuity in the program. Instead we have further division (didn't know that was possible) and a 65 year old head coach who just barely snuck in the tourney. The silver lining is Woodson just burnt all his bridges and will be unemployed after year 3 if he doesn't win.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dbmhoosier
I think the bare minimum was making the tourney this year, we just squeaked that out. If he had not made the tourney it would have been a bad off season. Instead, we won a few when it mattered and got our names in the bracket again, thank god. If he continues momentum and is in the top 25 next year we are good. If not, people will be salty. 9-11 and in the play in will not fly next year.
Yes we squeaked in with the win over Illinois and this team certainly had the talent to make the NCAA so it is good they did. Next year if he misses the NCAA alot of us will be upset but many wont. I know the routine after 20 years of this though Mike Davis never got to use these excuses he was trashed from day one and treated like crap. it is always the same excused . He needs four years, he has to get a full recruiting class, we are so young, wait til the shooters come, we had too many injuries, woodson cant shoot for them, you cannot judge a coach after two years, etc. It is always the same excuses for each coach and trust me they will be used again if we have a crappy year
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chris A.
I think it was handled terribly but i am in a very small minority most are just fine with this.
We have no idea how it was handled. For all we know, it may have been a very gracious, gentlemanly departure. Assuming Fife's subsequent statement on the matter was sincere, all is well for both parties and we all know how much IU likes to party!
 
Zoom out a little bit. The Woodson/Fife hire was sold on IU brotherhood and establishing some continuity in the program. Instead we have further division (didn't know that was possible) and a 65 year old head coach who just barely snuck in the tourney. The silver lining is Woodson just burnt all his bridges and will be unemployed after year 3, if he doesn't win.
That is 100% correct despite what coach geez says. It was mending the old wounds and uniting the old players and the fan base. That is how dolson sold it because people were not super excitd about the Wooson hire. I dont care what any current Fife haters say that is how it was sold. Does not matter what happened it has done nothing but divide us again. So to Joe Hillman how is the you gotta hire IU guys thing working out for you!
 
We have no idea how it was handled. For all we know, it may have been a very gracious, gentlemanly departure. Assuming Fife's subsequent statement on the matter was sincere, all is well for both parties and we all know how much IU likes to party!
If it was FIfe would have resigned. Instead he made them fire him. To me nothing of that seems like it was a gentlemanly departure and I am sure one day Fife will get to speak and tell his side. I hope he gets that chance.
 
I know some might not want to hear this but I like the fact that we are listening to the NBA coaches and not former MSU assistants. MSU, Wisc, and OSU have styles of play that need to die. Look at the freedom of movement in the SEC, ACC, Pac 12, Big East, then look where the McD's AA are going then look at the Big 10 success in the tourn. We need higher scoring games where the defense is like IU's this year (steals, blocks, proper positioning) as opposed to claw, grab, hold every play. This is how elite players want to play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: travlinhoosier
When you guys question why your program has trouble returning to prominence or hiring an A list head coach, look no further than this.

Every future candidate will ask himself/herself: if they will treat an alum who stayed loyal to the university at a turning point in the program and led them to a Final Four like this, what will they do to me?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chris A.
That is 100% correct despite what coach geez says. It was mending the old wounds and uniting the old players and the fan base. That is how dolson sold it because people were not super excitd about the Wooson hire. I dont care what any current Fife haters say that is how it was sold. Does not matter what happened it has done nothing but divide us again. So to Joe Hillman how is the you gotta hire IU guys thing working out for you!
What are you talking about dumba$$?

I was calling you out for your BS take that this somehow burns a potential bridge in Woodson hiring another IU guy on staff.

Do less.
 
While I don’t consider this to be good news, why does everyone think Dane Fife walks on water? Like yeah he was an assistant coach under Izzo but so was Tom Crean. That doesn’t really mean anything. The sky isn’t falling because Fife is gone. I liked the hire as I think most of us did, but move on. It’s not like he isn’t replaceable especially if what is coming out about his time at IU is true.
Probably for the same reason everyone thinks Woodson walks in water.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fpeaugh2
If it was FIfe would have resigned. Instead he made them fire him. To me nothing of that seems like it was a gentlemanly departure and I am sure one day Fife will get to speak and tell his side. I hope he gets that chance.
I see your point, but an argument could probably be made that anytime an employee is given the opportunity to resign in the eyes of his family and public before being "Your're fired!", offers a certain degree of gentlemanly departure steeped in graciousness of the giver, in this case "Woody".
 
IU gave him the choice to resign. Then they fired him SEVEN DAYS after the season ended.

Fife is an alum; he was a loyal starter on a Final Four team; he has no allegations of misdeeds against him. LET THE SMEAR CAMPAIGN BEGIN!
He has plenty of allegations. If half of what was said is true, he’s lucky he wasn’t fired mid season.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: EarlTubbs
This is the first time I've started to have my doubts on Woody, this is not a good look at all.

Dane was very popular at Michigan State and they won, a lot. Firing him after one season is a joke, simply shouldn't have happened.

What it looks like to me is that he gave input on some things and Woody didn't like his input. That said, I'm sure more will come out at some point.
So you haven’t seen the info from Rabjohns? Plenty has come out.
 
It's all over the internet not hard to find. Saw it several times today. That being said good for him if he felt he should not have to resign. He is enemy number one now but I like people who dont cave to pressure.

Based on the ways Fife sabotaged himself, I think Fife is his own worst enemy.
 
\

Fife walked on water until yesterday. People loved him until yesterday and many thought he would be the next coach. Right now it is very hip to hate Fife but there is not going to be any IU guy coming in after this fiasco and why would they when they see how quick the fan base will turn on you. I think it was handled terribly but i am in a very small minority most are just fine with this.
That’s not true. There have been rumors of problems since January.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: EarlTubbs
What info?
I’ll try to find link. He says Fife was negligent in recruiting duties, hated NIL and talked it down to players and families, and constantly talked politics and conspiracy theories to players even when asked to stop. Also that he leaked inside info to reporters, etc. Probably Dakich for one.
 
Did you not get the memo FIfe is the enemy now!! Good luck ever getting any younger IU alumni to coach at IU again after this is all I can say.
He is not the enemy but at the same time he never walked on water with me.

Why would anyone in their right mind want Fife to be the next head coach without first proving himself somewhere/anywhere? If he hadn't played for IU he wouldn't be on our radar.

It was a tough gig, but he did not exactly light it up as a head coach the first time. But agree the man is not Satan all of a sudden. Sometimes things don't work out. Time to move on.
 
The fan base didn't hire him, nor fire him. I don't see people hating on him, but there obviously was a problem. It's been suspected on here for weeks/months and I pretty much ignored it, but now there's no question: he and CMW didn't see eye to eye. If CMW came to that realization, then he did the difficult, but correct thing. Tell me, what positive contribution can you cite that Dane Fife made this year? I don't believe he was credited with getting any of our recruits or commitments and that was noticeable to me.
Exactly. Fife wasn’t just deadweight, he was actively *undermining* the program according to everything that’s coming out now. GTFO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lucy01
Zoom out a little bit. The Woodson/Fife hire was sold on IU brotherhood and establishing some continuity in the program. Instead we have further division (didn't know that was possible) and a 65 year old head coach who just barely snuck in the tourney. The silver lining is Woodson just burnt all his bridges and will be unemployed after year 3 if he doesn't win.
Woodson didn’t burn any bridges. Dolson was unhappy with Fife also.
 
I’ll try to find link. He says Fife was negligent in recruiting duties, hated NIL and talked it down to players and families, and constantly talked politics and conspiracy theories to players even when asked to stop. Also that he leaked inside info to reporters, etc. Probably Dakich for one.
What's amazing to me is somehow Michigan State was able to put up with all of this for 10 years while not missing a beat.

Our program is a joke.
 
Woodson didn’t burn any bridges. Dolson was unhappy with Fife also.
FIfe was Dolsons guy he hired him so this is 100% on him. So I hope he learned his lesson on the you gotta have an IU guy crap. The only people that care about that are the Ted Kitchels and Joe Hillmans who played at IU decades ago. No 18 year old kid gives a crap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbmhoosier
What's amazing to me is somehow Michigan State was able to put up with all of this for 10 years while not missing a beat.

Our program is a joke.
Coaches come and go. I'll be more worried if Yasir leaves as he was actually getting results in the recruiting trail. Or were you wanting Dane to be the next head coach?
 
What's amazing to me is somehow Michigan State was able to put up with all of this for 10 years while not missing a beat.

Our program is a joke.
It is seems amazing after 10 years as an assistant at a top program suddenly there are all these issues. It just all seems really odd to me. I find it very hard to believe Izzo would have put up with this alleged stuff becasue right now that is all it is. Two sides to every story despite what Fatjohns is saying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SIhoosier26
Exactly. Fife wasn’t just deadweight, he was actively *undermining* the program according to everything that’s coming out now. GTFO.
According to who fatjohns? You believe every single rumor that comes? Could there possibly be a coordinated effort to destory Fife and only give one narrative? Just saying lots of time more info come out later that is not part of the original rumors.
 
FIfe was Dolsons guy he hired him so this is 100% on him. So I hope he learned his lesson on the you gotta have an IU guy crap. The only people that care about that are the Ted Kitchels and Joe Hillmans who played at IU decades ago. No 18 year old kid gives a crap.
Who cares if Fife is an IU guy or not? If what is being reported about Fife is true, he should have been fired long before yesterday, regardless of his alumni status. Being an alum doesn't give you the right to be insubordinate. That's Business 101. It would have been a worse look on Woodson to retain Fife simply because he was an alum over putting up with the crap Fife was reportedly doing.
 
According to who fatjohns? You believe every single rumor that comes? Could there possibly be a coordinated effort to destory Fife and only give one narrative? Just saying lots of time more info come out later that is not part of the original rumors.
According to check the other thread about Fife and the list of crimes against the program I’m accumulating, chumway. It’s quite an indictment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EarlTubbs
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT