Or Bill Clinton and anybody in his and the Democrat's cesspool either right?
Cuomo.
- Thread starter dbmhoosier
- Start date
Cuomo needs to resign or face impeachment.
But..... But..... Kavanaugh.... But... But.....Trump!
More lies. Produce the link that Trump 'handcuffed' the FBI, liar.
Yeah, last time I looked, grabbing boobs and butts are sexual assaults.
But the rules are probably different for Democrats.
The FBI is now a political organization
And the House and Senate do nothing but investigate the prior and minority parties.
Meanwhile, a 99.9 Covid.2 survival rate is politically touted as success over a 99.83 Covid.1 rate.
We’ve never needed less government worse than now.
#voteemallout!
#noincumbents!
Bill Clinton: Impeached and has essentially been barred from any public office since.
Al Franken: Resigned and has essentially disappeared from public eye.
Cuomo: Appears to be going down in flames....pending. Possible jail time.
Kavanaugh: Approved to the supreme court. Lifetime appointment.
Donald Trump: Has more sexual harassment claims than all of the others listed here combined. Possible 2024 Republican presidential candidate.
Yeah, it's a whatabout, but there does seem to be a bit of a double standard here.
That damn Kavanaugh once drank Coke from a dirty glass! How appalling!
Everyone here is pretty much on the same page, for once - - that Cuomo is a POS - - yet you still find something to bitch about. Is your life that shitty that you need to come here to pick fights? I'm glad I'm not you. Loser.
Trump - Claims do not equal legal charges. What AG has charged him with anything?
Clinton could not be re-elected.
Franken - and now says he shouldn't have resigned.
Kavanaugh - not an ounce of evidence he did what she claimed 40 years ago. A clear attempt to take him out of the Supreme Court.
Don't get your panties in a bunch because you claimed it was 'only' harrassment' and not assault before you even knew what the hell was going on.
You are either hopelessly stupid, willfully ignorant, or out of your mind. I'm leaning toward #3.
I never defended his conduct, even if it was "only" harassment. I said he needs to go.
The report is 165 pages. As I said, i haven't yet read it but, since you have, I'd appreciate it if you could direct us to the portion that speaks to evidence of sexual assault.
Well, technically of everyone listed, I believe that Clinton is the only one where a "claim" was proven in court (Clinton's being a civil court finding, I believe, not criminal). And his job approval rating at the end of 2001 was above 60%. He was popular enough that he could have run for some other minor office and won.
Even what is listed in the report against Cuomo is still at the "claims" level.
Franken: yeah, he can bitch and moan, and yet he is still out of a job and wont get reelected anytime soon.
Kavanaugh: Supposedly she passed a lie detector test. I admit that I have not seen the full documentation of that test and the details are sketchy, and even though lie detector tests are not applicable in criminal trials, if I personally have to choose between two sides in an argument and one side has a lie detector test and the other side says "I have no recollection of that event", I will side with the one getting the test. The investigation was also, to put it lightly, rushed.
Trump is currently doing everything in his (and his lawyers) power to stall those claims against him. Out of curiosity, if Jean Carrol is able to finally get a DNA sample from Trump and it matches the stain on her dress, will your opinion of Trump change?
Regardless, at the end of the day, we are seeing the Democrats suffer consequences (even if they are not to the fullest extent of the law that a layman may suffer). The Republicans have yet to suffer much as far as I can tell.
I listened to the AG herself. You don't get it, as usual. You spoke up without knowing all the charges. And now you're backtracking.
So typical.
"Supposedly she passed a lie detector test."
Oh, sorry. I thought I was responding to someone who was actually serious.
Stupid false equivalencies...Kavanaugh was interviewing for a lifetime job, and character flaws obviously are a concern in hiring him to that lifetime job. Nobody was trying to arrest the guy.
Cuomo might go out in handcuffs, and may well deserve it.
Cuomo might go out in handcuffs, and may well deserve it.
That is completely false. She spoke only of sexual harassment.
Once again, please direct us to the portion of the report where he is accused of sexual assault. I want to know more about these charges of which you speak.
Idiot. She spoke of Cuomo grabbing the breasts and butt of women.
Even if I produce the evidence, you and Goat never will admit you're wrong, so F-you.
Which part are you doubting? Here is the link to the report:
Here's the polygraph test Christine Blasey Ford took on her allegations against Kavanaugh
An examination taken by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford was released Wednesday, showing she passed a polygraph test over the sexual assault allegations.
www.usatoday.com
As said, it is inadmissible in court. And it is so long ago that I doubt any true evidence can be gathered.
But at the end of the day, when you are talking about a he-said-she-said argument and no evidence exists to either prove or deny one person's side, I will take the side of the person who submits to a lie detector test and passes versus the person who refuses to get one.
There's a reason they're not admissable in court.Which part are you doubting? Here is the link to the report:
So yes, she did take one, and it found her to be truthful.Here's the polygraph test Christine Blasey Ford took on her allegations against Kavanaugh
An examination taken by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford was released Wednesday, showing she passed a polygraph test over the sexual assault allegations.www.usatoday.com
As said, it is inadmissible in court. And it is so long ago that I doubt any true evidence can be gathered.
But at the end of the day, when you are talking about a he-said-she-said argument and no evidence exists to either prove or deny one person's side, I will take the side of the person who submits to a lie detector test and passes versus the person who refuses to get one.
Sorry - I don't really care what you choose to believe.
That sound you hear is DANC moving the goalpost.
Has anyone ever seen DANC and Ordfan in the same room?
Yes, there is a reason. They are not perfect. They can be beaten.
And do you know how to beat them? With training. EXTENSIVE training.
It requires months of working with the machine and coaching from somebody who knows how to do it.
Regardless of what you have seen in movies, you can't just stick a tack in your shoe or think of sexual thoughts as the baseline. If you have no formal training, your odds of beating a lie detector test are about 1 in 100.
But it CAN be done. That is why it can not be submitted as evidence.
You can choose to not believe it. That's fine. There's a chance that you are right and I am wrong.
But those odds are 100 to 1 against you.
The odds of DANC ever being right are about the same as pu winning that first basketball NC this year.
Hmm. They do display strikingly similar levels of assholery.That sound you hear is DANC moving the goalpost.
Has anyone ever seen DANC and Ordfan in the same room?
Actually, I did some checking and I do need to correct something: The odds of defeating a lie detector test depend upon the examiner. It can range from 99% to 85%.
I'll still take those odds though.
I'll still take those odds though.
It depends upon multiple factors. How good the examiner is and what questions that person asks. Studies have shown that there are more false positives (the machine says an innocent person lying) than false negatives (a guilty person being able to pass).You mean 1% to 15%. otherwise that is really high odds there
Again, it can be done. But it is not something you can do without practice.
Yes, remember Gloria Steinem saying that one free grope was ok for Slick Willy with regards to Kathleen Willey.
Dems would do well then, they have a lot of practice
Cray, what's happened to you? You used to be able to give as well as you got...but lately, you are little more than a " I know you are, but what am I" bot. Most of your posts anymore are nothing but copying someone else, then saying some equivalent of "Yeah, sounds just like you/the dems".
Is everything okay?
Nonpartisan CNN
www.businessinsider.com
NY AG investigation confirms that CNN's Chris Cuomo helped his brother respond to sexual assault allegations
Chris Cuomo advised his brother to justify sexual assault allegations in a drafted press release with "sometimes I am playful and make jokes."
www.businessinsider.com
Fredo counseling Michael........Nonpartisan CNN
NY AG investigation confirms that CNN's Chris Cuomo helped his brother respond to sexual assault allegations
Chris Cuomo advised his brother to justify sexual assault allegations in a drafted press release with "sometimes I am playful and make jokes."
I'm smart....I really am.
Classic.
Similar threads
