Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Brooks is 19How about all Indiana
Langford
Brooks
Phinisee
My bad, got ahead of myselfBrooks is 19
Give me Garland and Dort
If Langford is unlikely to be added, it has absolutely nothing to do with the commitments today. We would take him in a heartbeat.Dort and Phinesee. Langford is a 2-3, mostly a 3. Considering the commits in the past 24hr it would seem unlikely that Langford is going to be added.
A ball handler and and a pure shooter would be the likely targets. Dort seems like a Wilmont kind of guard. Rod really became an important player in his 5 seasons. But from the videos, Dort doesn't look like a pure shooter and is more of a power guard. That's fine, but then let's get a lock down downtowner if that is the case. And clearly a pass first pg would add balance to the class.
He's too short to be a 3. He's only 6'4" not your typical size for a 3.Dort and Phinesee. Langford is a 2-3, mostly a 3. Considering the commits in the past 24hr it would seem unlikely that Langford is going to be added.
A ball handler and and a pure shooter would be the likely targets. Dort seems like a Wilmont kind of guard. Rod really became an important player in his 5 seasons. But from the videos, Dort doesn't look like a pure shooter and is more of a power guard. That's fine, but then let's get a lock down downtowner if that is the case. And clearly a pass first pg would add balance to the class.
Please tell me what the appropriate heights are for each position. I believe another 6'-4" forward that came to IU, got drafted #2, and currently is listed as a guard on the Pacers.He's too short to be a 3. He's only 6'4" not your typical size for a 3.
yes and wasn't that the problem against Syracuse and their length. You can get away with a 6'4" at the 3 in high school ball but tends to hurt in D1 basketball.Please tell me what the appropriate heights are for each position. I believe another 6'-4" forward that came to IU, got drafted #2, and currently is listed as a guard on the Pacers.
If Langford is unlikely to be added, it has absolutely nothing to do with the commitments today. We would take him in a heartbeat.
Is that your 18 and 19 wish list? Watford and Brooks are 19Romeo, Phinesee, Trendon Watford, Brooks, Garland
Length on the wing wasn't the issue against Syracuse. Langford is a basketball player. If you can play with a 3 guard lineup in college, you can have a 6'-4 wing with the skills Romeo has.. If it makes you feel better, let's call him a guard and he will be the perfect height.yes and wasn't that the problem against Syracuse and their length. You can get away with a 6'4" at the 3 in high school ball but tends to hurt in D1 basketball.
Is HE RECRUITING ANY BIGS TO REPLACE bRYANT?How about all Indiana
Langford
Brooks
Phinisee
yes and wasn't that the problem against Syracuse and their length. You can get away with a 6'4" at the 3 in high school ball but tends to hurt in D1 basketball.
No HE ISN't.Is HE RECRUITING ANY BIGS TO REPLACE bRYANT?
They made it sound like IU has backed off Phinisee some after an rough spring/summer.At this point, Archie is recruiting Phinisee and Langford the hardest as well as 2019. Garland seems to be a long shot - but if schools decide to back off because his ankle injury, that could be good news for us. Langford also seems to be a lean towards Louisville, however Archie is on him hard. I believe we will land Phinisee and the class will be a wrap. Phinisee said Archie wants to get at least one person on the staff to Phinisee's games in July. After Phinisee announces his decision in July, hopefully to IU, are focus will go towards Langford and 2019.
Where'd you get your information?They made it sound like IU has backed off Phinisee some after an rough spring/summer.
Front page article and not to mention we just offered another pg.Where'd you get your information?
Hmm...not sure I buy into that. I don't have premium for rivals, however I follow another site religiously full of IU insiders who also follow the recruits. So far, there has not been a mention us backing off of Phinisee. However, when we stopped recruiting Musa it was quickly pointed out. I could be wrong.Front page article and not to mention we just offered another pg.
It was said he had a bad aau year. personally I'm not that high on him. If he wasn't from Indiana many in here wouldn't want him.Hmm...not sure I buy into that. I don't have premium for rivals, however I follow another site religiously full of IU insiders who also follow the recruits. So far, there has not been a mention us backing off of Phinisee. However, when we stopped recruiting Musa it was quickly pointed out. I could be wrong.
Agreed. I live in Lafayette. See him all the time and have always wondered if he can be a B1G player at our level. Shot is getting better but..... really good HS player. I've always felt he would be stud at ISU or Ball St Would t mind getting him just cause Purdue is so close but won't be upset if he chooses elsewhereIt was said he had a bad aau year. personally I'm not that high on him. If he wasn't from Indiana many in here wouldn't want him.
We offered Devoe yesterday and then another Pg today. So I think we are moving on from phinnisseeAgreed. I live in Lafayette. See him all the time and have always wondered if he can be a B1G player at our level. Shot is getting better but..... really good HS player. I've always felt he would be stud at ISU or Ball St Would t mind getting him just cause Purdue is so close but won't be upset if he chooses elsewhere
Yep. Just saw he one for today.We offered Devoe yesterday and then another Pg today. So I think we are moving on from phinnissee
I'll admit the length Syracuse had in the back court did cause some issues for Hulls and Yogi, but as I remember it we didn't create passing lanes or get the defense moving to create openings. If there was a time to move the ball quickly, that was the time. Instead, we held the ball too long and then tried to force the ball into places that weren't open because we weren't moving and the ball wasn't moving.The problem against Syracuse, as I remember it, has been dismissed. If ever a loss was on a coach, with the group he had, it was that game. ZERO adjustments.
I'll admit the length Syracuse had in the back court did cause some issues for Hulls and Yogi, but as I remember it we didn't create passing lanes or get the defense moving to create openings. If there was a time to move the ball quickly, that was the time. Instead, we held the ball too long and then tried to force the ball into places that weren't open because we weren't moving and the ball wasn't moving.
Syracuse played their zone well and had players that fit their style of play. We didn't do enough to break them down. It is another case of the players not following the game plan, or not having the right game plan and not being able to adjust to what Syracuse was doing.
Doubt it. We need a true pass first PG, and Phinisee is just that. Devoe is not a PG, and more of a combo guard. Archie is not moving on from PhiniseeWe offered Devoe yesterday and then another Pg today. So I think we are moving on from phinnissee
What makes you so sure? Also I don't think Phinisee is very good. Also pass first pg? Why do we need that? It's not 1970Doubt it. We need a true pass first PG, and Phinisee is just that. Devoe is not a PG, and more of a combo guard. Archie is not moving on from Phinisee
What hurt us the most.....by far.......was having a coach who had NO CLUE how to beat a zone.Dipo was never listed as a SF for IU, he was a SG and Crean played with 3 guards in the starting lineup. There is no doubt that it hurt us having 4 players (also including Watford) that were undersized.
Hmm...not sure I buy into that. I don't have premium for rivals, however I follow another site religiously full of IU insiders who also follow the recruits. So far, there has not been a mention us backing off of Phinisee. However, when we stopped recruiting Musa it was quickly pointed out. I could be wrong.
What is wrong with 1970, that was the year I was bornWhat makes you so sure? Also I don't think Phinisee is very good. Also pass first pg? Why do we need that? It's not 1970
Nothing just the pg position today isn't like it used to be. Much rather have a Kylie, steph curry or Isaiah Thomas than a guy that is pass firstWhat is wrong with 1970, that was the year I was born
Just joking but I like to have a pg that will get others involved as well as being a scorer.Nothing just the pg position today isn't like it used to be. Much rather have a Kylie, steph curry or Isaiah Thomas than a guy that is pass first
You can do that without being pass first though.Just joking but I like to have a pg that will get others involved as well as being a scorer.
Peegs is wrong 99% of the time.
They said Wilkes was a lock when there was zero chance he was coming to IU.