I do get paid in big bucks, but no one will accept them. They seem to demand "real" dollars.
I do get paid in big bucks, but no one will accept them. They seem to demand "real" dollars.
McM will trade you for some of his doge coin.I do get paid in big bucks, but no one will accept them. They seem to demand "real" dollars.
It's that damn fiat money scam.I do get paid in big bucks, but no one will accept them. They seem to demand "real" dollars.
I didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday, it was Monday.McM will trade you for some of his doge coin.
Too late. Traded it all for Dave and Busters ticketsMcM will trade you for some of his doge coin.
I have a much better example. The fiat ponzi scam is having a senile 79 year old man sign a piece of paper that transfers 300-500 billion dollars to other citizens, stealing their wealth and time. Guess what didn't change today? Bitcoin. Not you, me, Joe Biden, Jerome Powell, or Christine Lagarde get to decide how much Bitcoin there is. There are still only 21 million of them.
Too late. Traded it all for Dave and Busters tickets
It's insane. In less than 2 years Biden and the Democrats have added over 4 trillion in spending/debt. That's on top of the trillions Trump added the prior two years. The federal government is a sh#t show.Elections have consequences. He is doing what he said he would do. This authoritarianism is allowed, that kind is not. I stand to benefit (I think, depending on details) and this is totally ridiculous as pointed out by several posters already, but if you voted for anyone other than Trump in the last election, this was the choice. The watered down green new deal was the choice. Joe did not run as a moderate.
This also kind of gets to my point in the abortion thread. The GOP better start to stand for something. From what I heard, the NAACP wasn't really cool with this handout for the reasons already mentioned (it is a payoff to those who already have opportunity) and now would be a good time to come and make that conservative case to that community. They take the money from you and use it to buy votes. Don't you think that you should be able to hold onto what you make? With a good job?
I'm going to go with she isn't a nutjob and understands the situation. She's just a grifter and gets paid well to back her team.This nutjob was a professor at OSU. That tells you all need to know about higher education and the problems it has.
Well thank God it's not being paid for by us taxpayers. I was really worried for a minute. I guess the mods can now lock the thread.I'm going to go with she isn't a nutjob and understands the situation. She's just a grifter and gets paid well to back her team.
You call him a nut job but follow the Comet Ping Pong basement conspiracy guy.This nutjob was a professor at OSU. That tells you all need to know about higher education and the problems it has.
lol...I take it back. She's dumb.Well thank God it's not being paid for by us taxpayers. I was really worried for a minute. I guess the mods can now lock the thread.
Eliminate the federal student loan programThere's a lot of shitty stuff out there - even with good schools. Wash U Law by way of example was cooking their placement books. They would send recent grads to local firms and literally pay their internship/salary and count them as placed. 10k isn't shit to that world, but still....
Anyway I'm with you in theory. I'd rather see interest/penalties dumped; loans dischargeable in bankruptcy, etc.
Schools are culpable too.. I think we're going to see some revisions in education in the coming years. Personally I'd rather have 300k in cash than the lost income and a bachelor's degree in whatever.
Eliminate the federal student loan program
It will not end with 10 or 20K. Maybe they should consider remedying the root causes of this vs a dump on the back-end.This nutjob was a professor at OSU. That tells you all need to know about higher education and the problems it has.
But someone has to pay it. Us. Just not the individual who contracted to pay it
They take taxes out on me every paycheck!Well, not all of us. In 2021, 57% of households paid no federal taxes. So those of us who do pay taxes are footing the bill.
I know of no one who considers $74k income as rich.You're wrong.
Who owes the most in student loans: New data from the Fed
Recently released data from the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances confirm that upper-income households account for a disproportionate share of student loan debt—and an even larger share of monthly out-of-pocket student debt payments.www.brookings.edu
"The highest-income 40 percent of households (those with incomes above $74,000) owe almost 60 percent of the outstanding education debt and make almost three-quarters of the payments. The lowest-income 40 percent of households hold just under 20 percent of the outstanding debt and make only 10 percent of the payments. It should be no surprise that higher-income households owe more student debt than others. Students from higher-income households are more likely to go to college in the first place. And workers with a college or graduate degree earn substantially more in the labor market than those who never went to college.
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2017, 2020), Survey of Consumer Finances 2016 and 2019, https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm, calculations by the authors. Sample includes households age 25 or older who are not current students.
Likewise, education debt is concentrated in households with high levels of educational attainment. In 2019, the new Fed data show, households with graduate degrees owed 56 percent of the outstanding education debt—an increase from 49 percent in 2016. For context, only 14 percent of adults age 25 or older hold graduate degrees. The 3 percent of adults with professional and doctorate degrees hold 20 percent of the education debt. These households have median earnings more than twice as high as the overall median ($106,000 vs. $47,000 in 2019).
I'm going to take issue with this from a purely political 2022 basis. A couple of points about the 2020 election, and the role of Gen Z...This move is a political mistake. Gen Z doesn’t vote. Old people do and they won’t like this action.
You have numerous Dems in this thread saying they are against itI'm going to take issue with this from a purely political 2022 basis. A couple of points about the 2020 election, and the role of Gen Z...
Exit polling showed that 65% of the 18-24 vote went for Biden, the highest differential among any age group. And between 53-55% of all registered voters in that age group voted, the highest it's ever been. So it's a significant constituency that he's been lagging with, because people who were invested in that issue didn't feel he was fulfilling his campaign promise...
The 2020 election shows Gen Z's voting power for years to come
65% of young voters voted for President-elect Joe Biden.www.cnbc.com
It may be that I just watch too much left wing programming, but I think this issue energizes people and is an overall plus heading into the midterms. I find it difficult to believe that people who were backing Dems and generally approve of their Legislative agenda are suddenly going to switch from voting for the Dem candidate they had decided to vote for in Nov over this issue.
I think largely most of the opposition to the move is going to come from people who already had decided to vote for a GOP candidate in whatever race. I just don't think on it's own it resonates negatively with people who were going to vote Dem.
Does it increase turnout on the other side? Possibly, but that seems a stretch to say that folks who hate Biden for a variety of reasons but had no plan to vote are going to come out in droves from anger over this singular issue. It seems like those hate Biden numbers are pretty baked in at this point.
On the other hand people who approve of legislation like the IRA and infrastructure etc... may feel invested in voting to show their support and also their desire to make sure the plan is implemented as laid out. Most of the Dem Legislative agenda that the GOP hates is actually popular with Dem voters, so cumulatively the odds are greater that popular legislation and issues like guns, choice and loan forgiveness which resonate with Dem voters are more likely to increase Dem turnout than they are to inspire opposition voters to vote.
I’m in. McM, give me the name of your guy.I have a much better example. The fiat ponzi scam is having a senile 79 year old man sign a piece of paper that transfers 300-500 billion dollars to other citizens, stealing their wealth and time. Guess what didn't change today? Bitcoin. Not you, me, Joe Biden, Jerome Powell, or Christine Lagarde get to decide how much Bitcoin there is. There are still only 21 million of them.
It can be bothI'm going to go with she isn't a nutjob and understands the situation. She's just a grifter and gets paid well to back her team.
Disagree 100%. I’ve never voted Republican once in my life, and I’m now convinced the pendulum needs to swing the other way.I'm going to take issue with this from a purely political 2022 basis. A couple of points about the 2020 election, and the role of Gen Z...
Exit polling showed that 65% of the 18-24 vote went for Biden, the highest differential among any age group. And between 53-55% of all registered voters in that age group voted, the highest it's ever been. So it's a significant constituency that he's been lagging with, because people who were invested in that issue didn't feel he was fulfilling his campaign promise...
The 2020 election shows Gen Z's voting power for years to come
65% of young voters voted for President-elect Joe Biden.www.cnbc.com
It may be that I just watch too much left wing programming, but I think this issue energizes people and is an overall plus heading into the midterms. I find it difficult to believe that people who were backing Dems and generally approve of their Legislative agenda are suddenly going to switch from voting for the Dem candidate they had decided to vote for in Nov over this issue.
I think largely most of the opposition to the move is going to come from people who already had decided to vote for a GOP candidate in whatever race. I just don't think on it's own it resonates negatively with people who were going to vote Dem.
Does it increase turnout on the other side? Possibly, but that seems a stretch to say that folks who hate Biden for a variety of reasons but had no plan to vote are going to come out in droves from anger over this singular issue. It seems like those hate Biden numbers are pretty baked in at this point.
On the other hand people who approve of legislation like the IRA and infrastructure etc... may feel invested in voting to show their support and also their desire to make sure the plan is implemented as laid out. Most of the Dem Legislative agenda that the GOP hates is actually popular with Dem voters, so cumulatively the odds are greater that popular legislation and issues like guns, choice and loan forgiveness which resonate with Dem voters are more likely to increase Dem turnout than they are to inspire opposition voters to vote.
It's the vendor driver guy on here. He's my financial guy. It's going greatI’m in. McM, give me the name of your guy.
I'm not a fan of the policy, but it doesn't vex me the way it does you. If I saw a thoughtful policy proposal on this topic from a conservative pol, it might motivate me differently, but I've yet to see the subject mattering to conservative politicians. Rather than attacking "university elites" in the classroom, conservatives should be attacking university admins pricing deserving kids out of higher education.Disagree 100%. I’ve never voted Republican once in my life, and I’m now convinced the pendulum needs to swing the other way.
Trump is nuts and I could never vote for him, but someone else maybe. The optics of this will grate the F out of people who have already paid, and even more so the people who don’t give two shits about the modern day care centers known as the American University.
Plus, anyone familiar with the student loan game, accrued interest, etc. 10K is a giant whoopty f’n doo. The plan is so poorly thought out and just pathetic actually.
With all the nonsense going on, it’s obvious to me the Democratic wing of our political system is a pandering group of idiots that could drive our country into the ground by being fiscally irresponsible.
The claims of America going soft are starting be factual, it’s not just a bunch of “hillbillies” parroting right wing narratives. Trump will never be the answer, but these idiots are not any better when it comes to policy.
Biden cancels $10,000 in federal student loan debt for most borrowers
President Joe Biden announced he will forgive $10,000 in federal student debt for most borrowers.www.cnbc.com
1. How does he have the power to do this? Under what law or Constitutional provision?
2. Isn't he just buying the votes of rich suburbanites (with taxpayer money) to the detriment of the working class?
I'm going to take issue with this from a purely political 2022 basis.
In law school they do. I’m sure med school too.Rich people don’t take out student loans.
But it won't change how we vote.You have numerous Dems in this thread saying they are against it
He Has a point. If you forgive $1 why not all of the dollars? I want the loan on my vaca home forgiven.. NOW GD'it!!!This nutjob was a professor at OSU. That tells you all need to know about higher education and the problems it has.
Were they rich when they took them out?In law school they do. I’m sure med school too.
I don't know. It's piling on. Read Vid's post. This is one clueless group of politicians. Guess it depends on who the parties put outBut it won't change how we vote.
Perhaps we should have similar recourse for other scenarios as well. Over pay for a house? Let the taxpayers cover the difference. Spend too much on a car? Forget the repo man, let the rest of us take care of it. No one forced any of these people to go to an overpriced university or take on stupid loan terms. I suspect waaayyy too many of these folks “drowning” in college debt are choosing to focus on that debt & are ignoring all of the other crap they spend their money on that’s keeping them from paying for school. It’s not up to conservatives to attack universities, there are few situations in which kids don’t have multiple roads to a college degree other than taking on a mountain of debt.I'm not a fan of the policy, but it doesn't vex me the way it does you. If I saw a thoughtful policy proposal on this topic from a conservative pol, it might motivate me differently, but I've yet to see the subject mattering to conservative politicians. Rather than attacking "university elites" in the classroom, conservatives should be attacking university admins pricing deserving kids out of higher education.
Yes. Some law schools have plans where they help pay them back like PSLF. And I’m sure some parents or relatives pay them off once they done (they sometimes do).Were they rich when they took them out?
This won't even be remembered this fall except by those who got some relief.I don't know. It's piling on. Read Vid's post. This is one clueless group of politicians. Guess it depends on who the parties put out
Many of their parents were, yes.Were they rich when they took them out?