Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just yet another final nail in the "Clovis first" coffin. It's crazy how many final nails we need until people finally accept what's been pretty obvious for years now.
Just yet another final nail in the "Clovis first" coffin. It's crazy how many final nails we need until people finally accept what's been pretty obvious for years now.
Most likely, the first migrants followed the Pacific coast (a coast that is now submerged under 120 feet of water), thousands of years before the melting of the glaciers opened up the famous inland route.
That's a strange way to characterize that link. What's your point?The Very First Americans May Have Had European Roots
Some early Americans came not from Asia, it seems, but by way of Europewww.smithsonianmag.com
Yeah, but those people were not always East Asian.
That we often make assumptions about things based on our modern view of how the world works as opposed to what really happened.That's a strange way to characterize that link. What's your point?
I'm not sure you quite understood your own link. All it does is report a finding that might answer why the NA genome includes so many haplotypes common in Europe and west Asia. Namely that a population migrated from west to east shortly before the migration to the Americas, and this population might have supplied some of the genes of the people who eventually made the journey, i.e., by breeding with the east Asian populations already in Siberia.That we often make assumptions about things based on our modern view of how the world works as opposed to what really happened.
Right now the idea is that a land bridge got the early "Americans" here. That would mean that people would have had to migrate from Europe, across Asia, to get to the Americas. Or...maybe there is even more we don't know and people from Asia and Europe were both finding a way to get here and then intermingling?
Absolutely possible/probable. And before we had good DNA testing, conventional wisdom would have said that there should not be European markers in the Native American populations. But we found them and now conventional wisdom is that they must have moved east to west and probably intermingled before they crossed the land bridge and got here. Just looking at things from our current understanding, that makes the most sense now. However, I believe we keep finding out new things that challenge conventional wisdom.I'm not sure you quite understood your own link. All it does is report a finding that might answer why the NA genome includes so many haplotypes common in Europe and west Asia. Namely that a population migrated from west to east shortly before the migration to the Americas, and this population might have supplied some of the genes of the people who eventually made the journey, i.e., by breeding with the east Asian populations already in Siberia.