Good point. It's his job to protect the Constitution.I'm sure General Milley is on the case though....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good point. It's his job to protect the Constitution.I'm sure General Milley is on the case though....
Is that because (1) other countries have in fact already given their formal approval to the same vaccines, and (2) drug companies are required to conduct and demonstrate scientific studies before they are even permitted to submit their applications for approval?Yes I am and in this instance I believe that to be true.
What effect do you think the 2017 Tax Cuts And Jobs Act had on inflation and the national debt.I don’t know how you can support what we’re seeing! Endless spending! Horrible inflation! Govt interference in our lives! Crime rampant from these defund the police fools. Are there any Dems out there strong enough to stand up to the progressives that control your party or do they have to kiss their ring and act like we need trillions more?!!!
WE JUST FLIPPED THE SCRIPT!!!!
I do! I do!What effect do you think the 2017 Tax Cuts And Jobs Act had on inflation and the national debt.
Does anyone really think today that it is paying for itself?
Fiscal Year | Revenue |
---|---|
FY 2021 | $3.86 (estimated) |
FY 2020 | $3.71 trillion (estimated) |
FY 2019 | $3.46 trillion (actual) |
FY 2018 | $3.33 trillion |
FY 2017 | $3.32 trillion |
FY 2016 | $3.27 trillion |
FY 2015 | $3.25 trillion |
FY 2014 | $3.02 trillion |
FY 2013 | $2.77 trillion |
FY 2012 | $2.45 trillion |
FY 2011 | $2.30 trillion |
FY 2010 | $2.16 trillion |
FY 2009 | $2.10 trillion |
FY 2008 | $2.52 trillion |
FY 2007 | $2.57 trillion |
FY 2006 | $2.41 trillion |
FY 2005 | $2.15 trillion |
FY 2004 | $1.88 trillion |
FY 2003 | $1.78 trillion |
FY 2002 | $1.85 trillion |
FY 2001 | $1.99 trillion |
FY 2000 | $2.03 trillion |
FY 1999 | $1.82 trillion |
FY 1998 | $1.72 trillion |
FY 1997 | $1.58 trillion |
FY 1996 | $1.45 trillion |
FY 1995 | $1.35 trillion |
FY 1994 | $1.26 trillion |
FY 1993 | $1.15 trillion |
FY 1992 | $1.09 trillion |
FY 1991 | $1.05 trillion |
FY 1990 | $1.03 trillion |
FY 1989 | $991 billion |
FY1988 | $909 billion |
FY 1987 | $854 billion |
FY 1986 | $769 billion |
FY 1985 | $734 billion |
FY 1984 | $666 billion |
FY 1983 | $601 billion |
FY 1982 | $618 billion |
FY 1981 | $599 billion |
FY 1980 | $517 billion |
FY 1979 | $463 billion |
FY 1978 | $399 billion |
FY 1977 | $356 billion |
FY 1976 | $298 billion |
FY 1975 | $279 billion |
FY 1974 | $263 billion |
FY 1973 | $231 billion |
FY 1972 | $207 billion |
FY 1971 | $187 billion |
FY 1970 | $193 billion |
FY 1969 | $187 billion |
FY 1968 | $153 billion |
FY 1967 | $149 billion |
FY 1966 | $131 billion |
FY 1965 | $117 billion |
FY 1964 | $113 billion |
FY 1963 | $107 billion |
FY 1962 | $100 billion |
FY 1961 | $94 billion |
FY 1960 | $93 billion |
FY 1789–1959 | $1.1 trillion |
Do you think vaccines are safe and effective?Is that because (1) other countries have in fact already given their formal approval to the same vaccines, and (2) drug companies are required to conduct and demonstrate scientific studies before they are even permitted to submit their applications for approval?
Ten thousand Stuffshots? You mean I'm winning? All right!All joking aside I view the FB issue very seriously. We have two super shitty parties. This is the worst we fear from the Dems. Endless entitlements capturing citizens. Overreaching bs like FB. They want to add thousands of irs agents. Igw is right. You think the billionaires will be hassled. No way. Their shit is too complicated. They’ll send ten thousand stuffshots to hassle small businesses. Throw in the defund the police and woke bs and we may end up with trump round two. God help us all
Yes, to the extent that new cases and recent deaths appear to be overwhelingly among the unvaccinated.Do you think vaccines are safe and effective?
Not with regards to the FDA and whether folks should be waiting for their approval to get vaccinated, which was what my original statement was concerningYes, to the extent that new cases and recent deaths appear to be overwhelingly among the unvaccinated.
Any other response to my question?
I don't remember whether the drug companies' submissions to the FDA (with their evidence) are public so we could review them. But, if their science appeared sound, I would agree that the FDA's later, formal approval would be secondary to my concerns.Not with regards to the FDA and whether folks should be waiting for their approval to get vaccinated, which was what my original statement was concerning
no. that's political. the irs weasels (you would be a great one) will be tantamount to the ncaa attacking cleveland state and ignoring duke. small businesses will pay bc theyre easier targets. less complex. amirite @stollcpaTen thousand Stuffshots? You mean I'm winning? All right!
Actually, there is good reason to believe the feds are indeed enforcing tax laws and related statutes on billionaires (or at least on people who claim to be billionaires).
Trump Org. and top aide charged with 15-year scheme to defraud U.S. of taxes
Prosecutors described a conspiracy to compensate executives "off the books" to avoid paying taxes. The company pleaded not guilty.www.nbcnews.com
Well, there's nothing else to say after you dismiss a relevant example by reciting that the case actually filed is "political." The case began under Trump, you know.no. that's political. the irs weasels (you would be a great one) will be tantamount to the ncaa attacking cleveland state and ignoring duke. small businesses will pay bc theyre easier targets. less complex. amirite @stollcpa
And good day to you sirWell, there's nothing else to say after you dismiss a relevant example by reciting that the case actually filed is "political." The case began under Trump, you know.
Have a good day.
Doesn’t matter it started under Trump.Well, there's nothing else to say after you dismiss a relevant example by reciting that the case actually filed is "political." The case began under Trump, you know.
Have a good day.
Is this a rhetorical question? lolAre you really this completely, slack-jawed, Kentucky sister-f*cking DUMB?
What happened with the police brutality movement was a lot like what happened with MeToo. It started with a good effort to expose some people doing very bad things, but then it was in a constant search for more villains to the point where the targets went way beyond that.i hear ya on the gun control but i was more referring to biden's telling cities to use their extra covid dough to hire more cops. that's a symbolic slap in the face to the nonsense of the progressives, coupled with a cop poised to be mayor of our largest city. i sense the admin recognizes the backlash is coming against CRT/Defund police/far left rhetoric/policies pushed by academics and the media and that if they hope to have a decent midterm they better get back to the middle.
as for repealing gun industry immunity i too believe that would help - but it doesn't do much for hte estimated 400 million guns already in circulation.
LOL Big difference - you know what paragraphs are for.What happened with the police brutality movement was a lot like what happened with MeToo. It started with a good effort to expose some people doing very bad things, but then it was in a constant search for more villains to the point where the targets went way beyond that.
Police officers aren't quitting across the country because of the Chauvin verdict. They are quitting because they saw the narrative go from "we must hold bad police officers accountable" to "all police officers are bad".
They saw efforts throughout the country to unjustifiably cut already tight budgets making their jobs more difficult and they saw regular protests rise up and cops being targeted even after legitimate and justified uses of force.
Just as an example: They saw the top NBA player in the world put a target on a police officer's back after he saved a young African American girl from being stabbed. Now they are almost forced to hesitate in life and death situations.
In Portland, we had almost a year's worth of nightly riots and even police stations set on fire, but political leaders wouldn't let them take action or protect them. Instead, they saw public officials consistently demonize them.
So after all that, we didn't get rid of the bad cops that use excessive force. We had a lot of good cops say that the job probably isn't worth it. They can go work somewhere else for similar pay without the risks and demonization.
I can't blame them, but the consequences are that the neighborhoods that need them most are left with surging crime and no one to properly address it.
In fact, the rotten apples were more likely to stay because they like having that power to abuse. And I say all that as someone who thinks police brutality and abuse are real issues that are being insufficiently addressed, who thinks police unions tend to protect the worst officers, that body cameras are a necessity, and that we need more accountability.
Apologies to Cosmic and IGW for this writing style
What does starting under Trump prove? You think government agencies were non partisan under Trump?Well, there's nothing else to say after you dismiss a relevant example by reciting that the case actually filed is "political." The case began under Trump, you know.
Have a good day.
Wow. Another huge loss for The Squad. Almost every socialist and left-wing anti-Semite was working overtime to back Turner. Sanders, AOC, Cori Bush etc. all campaigned with her recently and raised a ton of money for her. Didn't matter.
James Clyburn now 2-0 in Democrat primaries against the AOC-Sanders wing. The latter group has the activist press support, but Clyburn still represents a bigger portion of Democrat voters.
Meanwhile, the Trumpiest Pub won the primary in the other Ohio contest.Yep, the CBC and Clyburb 1) doesn't want the squad- type quacks going after their members in primaries and 2) understands that black voters aren't nearly as liberal as the loons wish for.
Trump put people like you in their place! That’s what Iiked about him!Well, there's nothing else to say after you dismiss a relevant example by reciting that the case actually filed is "political." The case began under Trump, you know.
Have a good day.
Remember when Ohio was a swing state? The extreme moves right by states like Ohio, Indiana, and Missouri are something to watch.Meanwhile, the Trumpiest Pub won the primary in the other Ohio contest.
She's toxic with a capital T and her sesession speech was embarrassing.
Nina Turner and her Squad allies raised nearly double her opponent. She lost.
The "evil money" she is referring to here is Jewish Democrats vocally backing her opponents and her statement only validates why they were right to do so.
Revolutions are fun to talk about but they rarely happen without conforming and appealing to the middle.
Self-awareness is lackingShe's toxic with a capital T and her sesession speech was embarrassing.
It's always someone else's fault with both extremes.
One of these days Bernie's movement is going to realize that their beliefs are shared by a small amount of people and if they want to grow, they need to turn the vitriol down several notches, stop being so conspiracy laden and start to making arguments that appeal to the majority of the country.
Revolutions are fun to talk about but they rarely happen without conforming and appealing to the middle.