ADVERTISEMENT

Congrats Democrats

Is there any way to categorically know who the BEST person is? I've been involved in hiring, it usually has come down to hair-splitting. I can't say that I've ever been in a hire where one person came in and was clearly "the best".

Mostly I have hired programmers. As an example, we have had 1 person who seemed to have more experience in the language we needed, someone with more overall programming experience, and someone with good experience but excellent at communication (since they often worked directly with clients communication was important). I don't know that I ever sat through a hiring cycle and had one person who was the best in the language we most needed, best in all the other languages we used, was the best communicator and at writing documentation, and would work for what we paid.

I think we tend to justify our decisions after the fact with "they were the best" when in reality we were splitting hairs we couldn't really see.
Right, but if it's that hard for you to delineate and you are working with all those factors, why intentionally limit yourself based on a criteria that isn't useful to perform the job well?

Rivals laying off basketball staff. Football only coverage going forward per TOS.

I notice this site has the same stories and frontline pics for days on end. Most sites have new ones up daily. Even the free forum used to be more informative and idea provoking than it is today. Had some great people with input back then when Peegs was going good.
That's BS, there 7 new stories up right now going back 1 day and 7 more going back 2 days. Refresh your browser.

Good news

You are correct, but my point is that if you are not incorporating weight training while on the drug, you will lose muscle tone along with the fat. The people I know to be using Ozempic look sickly and skeletal. I had not seen one guy in months and my first thought was cancer. That’s not a “healthy” look.
Yep. The most concerning thing was jsig's report it left him feeling crappy and without energy and not wanting to work out. That's not a good thing. You need both to be healthy.

But if you're obese, I think it's still better health-wise for you to lose the weight. Then, maybe with a smaller stomach and habit of eating less, you go off the drug and try working out and eating well.

I’m going to kill Fox.

I think Rocky would be at the top of everyone's list. I also liked The Natural, but it hasn't aged well, imo. I just watch it for the line: "Pick me out a winner, Bobby". Damn, that gets to me every time.
Was planning on checking out some of The Natural film locations last year when we were up in Buffalo for a game...most have sadly been torn down. Sucks.

Kelly on Trump

Many pundits and pols saw her debate as her success. She certainly landed a lot of punches. If that is how you measure success, fine. But she squandered the lead with numerous episodes of incoherence and word salads. She can’t get beyond “Trump is a bad dude” message. She can’t explain “opportunity economy” in a way that makes any sense. Her anti-Israel messaging comes through loud and clear. She is full of vapid platitudes. She can’t relate to McDonalds employees or customers as Trump did. Her biggest advantage is she owns the umpires. That could be enough.
Nonsense. You, Murt, and many others have assured me for years that our elections are very secure and fraud is impossible.

Hoosier Hysteria Clips...

Has nothing to do with the conversation in this thread. So your "correction" was out of context, and unnecessary. Unless you have some sort of urge to prop Purdue, out of context?

In other threads, I've given Painter tons of credit for winning with different types of teams.

I'll say it again...and I guess include some specific names this time to help you out with context...

Smith and Loyer, historically, haven't been all that good when Edey is on the bench, or when the opposing team chooses to guard them all straight up. So Blimpy's point about them being 40% plus or whatever he listed...doesn't mean much of anything until they show it without Edey on the roster.
My fault, I thought you were saying PU hasn’t been good without Edey. I agree it will be interesting to see if Loyer and Smith are better this year.

Washington/Indiana Prediction Thread

I do not see us making 40+ points, let alone 50+.
I would love to be wrong but the most important position is QB and we are using a back up QB.
Jackson has experience (started 5 games last year) which is great and we are at home. His scramble/run ability will help (I hope). I think we need three things:
1. Home crowd to give Tayven extra confidence.
2. More than just establish the run, but have the running game carry us. Keep Wash defense on the field. Force them to stack the box.
3. Great D performance. Next man up includes the D to rise to the occasion.

Kelly on Trump

The only person you ever embarrass publicly is yourself. That's why you are on user name three thousand.

P.S. You're just passing off the same point crazed has been making in this thread as your own. So scummy. ;)
People will often make the same or a similar point. Especially when it is the correct one. People don't usually use the same four sentences verbatim. That's only brain dead. Jon Stewarts premise isn't even true. Trump is the most scrutinized President in history.

Kelly on Trump

No Harry. WTF is wrong with you? That you allow yourself to be manipulated so easily? See post #58 for an explanation on how you are being manipulated. The Harris campaign is splicing together comments from several different conversations and drawing bad faith inferences. You need to do better.
Oh my, you are one sick little cult member if you think that was conjured up by the Harris campaign. I think our tit for tat is over with I can see your a bit of a nut. Bye.
  • Like
Reactions: BCCHoosier

Hoosier Hysteria Clips...

I was just correcting your comment that they haven’t historically been good without Edey. Not emotional at all, just give them credit, they have been the better program in Indiana for last 15-20 years.
Has nothing to do with the conversation in this thread. So your "correction" was out of context, and unnecessary. Unless you have some sort of urge to prop Purdue, out of context?

In other threads, I've given Painter tons of credit for winning with different types of teams.

I'll say it again...and I guess include some specific names this time to help you out with context...

Smith and Loyer, historically, haven't been all that good when Edey is on the bench, or when the opposing team chooses to guard them all straight up. So Blimpy's point about them being 40% plus or whatever he listed...doesn't mean much of anything until they show it without Edey on the roster.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT